Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (수산해양교육연구)

The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (한국수산해양교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Qualitative Evaluation of Educational Programs

교육 프로그램의 질적 평가 방안 탐색

  • Received : 2017.01.18
  • Accepted : 2017.02.17
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of qualitative evaluation and applicable models in the evaluation area of educational program. To this end, the concept and characteristics of qualitative evaluation are examined, and grounded theory is selected as a suitable methodology for evaluation, and its characteristics and procedures are described. Because qualitative evaluation focuses on the spontaneous practice elements of the site, it can supplement the quantitative evaluation of the variables set in advance. The researcher presented the theory of qualification as a methodology for qualitative evaluation, aiming to extract the theory explaining the phenomenon among the qualitative methodologies.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Ho-Soon(2008). Educational Program Evaluation Theory. Seoul: Wonmisa.
  2. Charmaz, K.(2010). Grounded Theory: Objective and Constructivist Methods. In W. Luttrell (Ed.) Qualitative Educational Research: Reading in reflective methodology and transformative practice. (183-207). London: Routledge
  3. Department for International Development(2008). (Draft) Policy statements on Impact evaluation: September version. Department for International Development.
  4. Garbarino, Sabine & Jeremy Holland(2009). Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Impact Evaluation and Measuring Results. Issues Paper, Governance and Social Development Resource Centre.
  5. Go, Mi-Young(2009). Qualitative case studies. Seoul: Chungmoksa.
  6. Gwak, Young-Soon(2009). Qualitative studies: Philosophy, Art and Education. Pazoo: Education Science.
  7. Hong, Young-Ki(2011). Grounded Theoric Approach in Curriculum Design and Reconstruction. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 5(2), 1-18.
  8. Kim, Young-Chun(2013). Qualitative research methodology(II): Methods. Pazoo: Academy Press.
  9. Lee, Eun-hwa(2006). A Study on Developing a Conceptual Model of Course Evaluation in University, Journal of Fishries and Marice Sciences Education, 18(3), 314-328.
  10. Lee, Suk-Min(2012). A study on evaluation theory and model based on philosophical paradigm. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 22(1), 59-89.
  11. Lee, Won-Suk(2013). Qualitative inquiry and program evaluation. Journal of Educational Development, 29(1), 79-92.
  12. Mathison, S.(1988). Why triangulate? Educational research. 17(2), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017002013
  13. Patton, M. Q.(2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
  14. Rho, Hwa-Joon(2004). Policy Evaluation. Seoul: Bubmoon.
  15. Seidman, I.(2006). Interviewing as qualitative research. NY: Teachers College Press.
  16. Shaw, Ian (1998). Qualitative Evaluation. London: Sage Publications.
  17. Stainback, W., and S. Stainback.(1984). A Rationale for the Merger of Special and Regular Education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102-111.
  18. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  19. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.(1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  20. Zukoski, Ann & Luluquisen, Mia.(2002). Participatory Evaluation: What is it? Why Do it? What are the Challenges? Policy & Practice, 5: 1-6.