DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Content Validity and Case Studies of Responses to Scientific Questions on Qualification Examination for High School Graduation

고졸검정고시 과학 문항 타당도와 문항 반응 사례 분석

  • Received : 2016.09.07
  • Accepted : 2016.10.28
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

This study was to evaluate the suitability of scientific questions as qualification examination for high school graduation by content validity and item response with three examinees and two preliminary examinees. As a result, scientific questions were concentrated on two units of six units of total, and application appeared to be lacking problem area by 8% compared to understanding and application. Examinees and preliminary examinees chose correct answers most by hap or guess, sometimes by experience or common sense, and the least by scientific concept. In addition, they could chose correct answers by hap or guess because there were words that implied the correct answer in questions and answers, or because they could compared and/or analyzed questions and answers. With these results, two proposals were suggested as follows; (1) scientific questions of qualification examination for high school graduation should measure basic scientific literacy. (2) specific criteria for science literacy in qualification examination for high school graduation should be set.

Keywords

References

  1. Hatch, J. A.(2008). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. [진영은 역]. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  2. KICE(Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation). (2015). Seminar for Improvement measures of directions and criteria of qualification examination equivalent to high school graduation. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. Seminar ORM 2015-94.
  3. KICE(Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation). (2016). Questions of science subject on qualification examination for a high school diploma on April in 2016. Retrieved from http//www.kice.re.kr/.
  4. Kim, D..Kim, K..Ga, E..Kim, Y..Kim, J.. Kim, C..Yu, C..Yoon, J. & Lee, H.(2015a). Restructuring plans for a range of presenting questions of qualification examination equivalent to high school graduation according to 2009 revised curriculum. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. Issue Paper, ORM 2015-50-28.
  5. Kim, D..Kim, K..Kim, C. & Lee, H.(2015b). Age-specific characteristics and implications in the criteria and directions of qualification examination equivalent to school graduation. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. Issue Paper, ORM 2015-50-17.
  6. Kim, D..Kim, K..Kim, C..Lee, H..Park, C. & Kim, S.(2015c). Improvement measures of directions and criteria of school qualification examination questions for a diploma. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. Research Report RRO 2015-1.
  7. Kim, Ji young & Kim, Kyong hee(2009). An analysis of trends in high school students' scientific literacy achievement. Journal of Rearch in Curriculum Instruction, 13(3), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2009.13.3.457
  8. Kim, Sunah(2012). Individual, social factors, and experience after school dropout: differences between delinquent and non-delinquent dropout youth. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 12(10), 216-226. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.10.216
  9. Kim, Younghee(2015). The adjustment experiences of high school dropout youths who chose to take qualification examinations. Journal of Youth Welfare, 17(2), 131-157.
  10. Lee, Eun-Hwa(2012). Development of teaching and learning model for the key competencies education in the university. Jour. Fish. Mar. Sci. Edu., 24(6), 763-780. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2012.24.6.763
  11. Lee, Jong Seung(2009). Modern Education Evaluation. Pajoo: Kyoyookgwahaksa.
  12. Lee, Ju-Won.Lee, Jung-Mi & Na, Won-Bae(2011). Descriptive statistical analysis on grade characteristics and employment rates of ocean-related college students. Jour. Fish. Mar. Sci. Edu., 23(4), 615-625.
  13. Lee, Yang-Rak(2001). Analysis of test items of earth science and the applicants' responses on the items in the college scholastic ability test. Jour. Korean Earth Science Society, 22(6), 469-479.
  14. MEST(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology).(2011). 2009 Revised Curriculum for High School. MEST Notification No. 2011-361 [Supplement 4].
  15. Ministry of Education(2013). Improvement of school qualification examination. Ministry of Education Press release. on Aug. 1st.
  16. Moon, Sungchae(2016). The effects of discussion on college students' communication capability, problem-solving capability and leadership in a general education course. Jour. Fish. Mar. Sci. Edu., 28(1), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2016.28.1.300
  17. Park, Ji-hyun(2016). Investigation on improvement of music item through analyzing qualification examination for elementary, middle, and high school graduation. Journal of Music Education Science, 26, 1-19.
  18. Seo, Hyun-Sook.Hwang, Jin-Seok & Kwack, Dae-Oh(2010). An anlysis of scientific literacy covered in testing items on the biology section of the scholastic achievement test. Journal of Rearch in Curriculum Instruction, 14(3), 601-620. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2010.14.3.601
  19. Seong, Tae Jae(2014). Educational evaluation. 2nd Eds. Seoul: Hakjisa Publication Co.
  20. Yoon, Sungwon(2011). Analysis of content validity of music subject in 2007-2009 entrance qualification examination for high school. Journal of Music Education Science, 12, 109-130.
  21. Yu, Byung Ha(2009). Analysis on the operation status of the Korean graduation equivalency examination and the proper solution to the problem of existing system. Korea National University of Education. Master's thesis.
  22. Yune, So-Jung(2013). The development and effects of a preventative learning consultation program for university underachievers. Jour. Fish. Mar. Sci. Edu., 25(3), 643-660. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2013.25.3.643