DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Co-occurrence Patterns of Bird Species in the World

  • Kim, Young Min (Department of Integrated Biological Science, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hong, Sungwon (Department of Integrated Biological Science, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Yu Seong (Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Hannam University) ;
  • Oh, Ki Cheol (Nakdong River Basin Environmental Office) ;
  • Kim, Gu Yeon (Department of Science Education, College of Natural Sciences, Kyungnam University) ;
  • Joo, Gea-Jae (Department of Integrated Biological Science, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2017.12.11
  • Accepted : 2017.12.22
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

In order to identify key nations and bird species of conservation concern we described multinational collaborations as defined using network analysis linked by birds that are found in all nations in the network. We used network analysis to assess the patterns in bird occurrence for 10,422 bird inventories from 244 countries and territories. Nations that are important in multinational collaborations for bird conservation were assessed using the centrality measures, closeness and betweenness centrality. Countries important for the multinational collaboration of bird conservation were examined based on their centrality measures, which included closeness and betweenness centralities. Comparatively, the co-occurrence network was divided into four groups that reveal different biogeographical structures. A group with higher closeness centrality included countries in southern Africa and had the potential to affect species in many other countries. Birds in countries in Asia, Australia and the South Pacific that are important to the cohesiveness of the global network had a higher score of betweenness centrality. Countries that had higher numbers of bird species and more extensively distributed bird species had higher centrality scores; in these countries, birds may act as excellent indicators of trends in the co-occurrence bird network. For effective bird conservation in the world, much stronger coordination among countries is required. Bird co-occurrence patterns can provide a suitable and powerful framework for understanding the complexity of co-occurrence patterns and consequences for multinational collaborations on bird conservation.

Keywords

References

  1. Bird species distribution maps of the world. BirdLife International, Cambridge. UK and NatureServe 2015 [cited 2 February 2015]. Available from http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/country.
  2. Bohning-Gaese, K. and R. Oberrath. 1999. Phylogenetic effects on morphological, life-history, behavioural and ecological traits of birds. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1: 347-364.
  3. Butchart, S.H., M. Walpole, B. Collen, A. Van Strien, J.P. Scharlemann, R.E. Almond, J.E. Baillie, B. Bomhard, C. Brown and J. Bruno. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164-1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512
  4. Cassey, P., T.M. Blackburn, D. Sol, R.P. Duncan and J.L. Lockwood. 2004. Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 271(Suppl 6): S405-S408. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0199
  5. Donald, P.F., F.J. Sanderson, I.J. Burfield, S.M. Bierman, R.D. Gregory and Z. Waliczky. 2007. International conservation policy delivers benefits for birds in Europe. Science 317: 810-813. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146002
  6. Favell, A. 2008. The new face of East-West migration in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34: 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830802105947
  7. Newman, M. 2010. Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press, UK.
  8. Olson, D.M. and E. Dinerstein. 1998. The Global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conservation Biology 12: 502-515. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x
  9. Olson, D.M., E. Dinerstein, E.D. Wikramanayake, N.D. Burgess, G.V. Powell, E.C. Underwood, J.A. D’amico, I. Itoua, H.E. Strand and J.C. Morrison. 2001. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience 51: 933-938. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2
  10. Proulx, S.R., D.E. Promislow and P.C. Phillips. 2005. Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.004
  11. Runge, C.A., J.E. Watson, S.H. Butchart, J.O. Hanson, H.P. Possingham and R.A. Fuller. 2015. Protected areas and global conservation of migratory birds. Science 350: 1255-1258. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9180
  12. Scott, J. 2012. Social network analysis. Sage, UK.
  13. Sodhi, N.S., R. Butler, W.F. Laurance and L. Gibson. 2011. Conservation successes at micro-, meso-and macroscales. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26: 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.002
  14. Webb, C.O., D.D. Ackerly, M.A. McPeek and M.J. Donoghue. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 475-505. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448
  15. Williams, D.R., R.G. Pople, D.A. Showler, L.V. Dicks, M.F. Child, E.K. Zu Ermgassen and W.J. Sutherland. 2013. Bird Conservation: Global evidence for the effects of interventions, Vol 2. Pelagic Publishing, UK.