DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Empirical Study on the Performance-oriented remuneration system in the public companies of thermal power generation effects on Organization Commitment and Organizational Performance

발전공기업의 성과지향보수제도가 조직몰입 및 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증 연구

  • 인재만 (호서대학교 벤처대학원 벤처경영학과) ;
  • 하규수 (호서대학교 벤처대학원 벤처경영학과)
  • Received : 2016.10.13
  • Accepted : 2017.02.03
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to empirically analyze whether performance-oriented remuneration systems in public thermal power generation companies substantially induces organizational commitment of employees, and contributes to organizational performance. According to the study, adequacy of salary and individual work evaluation have significant effects on organizational commitment, whereas external and internal evaluations for pay-for-performance remuneration systems do not have a significant effect. Annual salary for performance and pay-for-performance systems have a significant influence on organizational performance. In addition, because annual salary and individual work evaluation of the performance-oriented remuneration system have significant effects on both the indirect effect, through organizational commitment, as well as the direct effect on organizational performance, there exists a partially mediated effect on organizational commitment. Conversely, because external and internal evaluations do not significantly affect organizational commitment, there is no means of verifying the mediating effect. Studies suggest that a fair annual salary system for performance employed in conjunction with a pay-for-performance system will provide positive impacts on organizational performance and employee loyalty.

본 연구는 발전공기업의 성과지향보수제도가 실질적으로 직원들의 조직몰입도를 유도하여 조직의 효율성 및 조직성과 제고에 기여하는 지의 여부를 실증적으로 분석하여 공기업의 성과지향보수제도가 나아가야 할 방향을 제시해보려고 했다. 연구결과에 의하면 성과연봉제의 개인별 성과보상 적정성과 성과연봉 확정을 위한 개인별 근무평정은 조직몰입에 유의한 영향을 미치는 반면, 성과배분제의 외부평가(정부경영평가) 및 내부평가는 조직몰입에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않았다. 성과연봉제와 성과배분제 모두는 조직성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 성과지향보수제도 중 성과연봉제의 보상적정성 및 개인별 근무평정은 조직성과에 직접적으로 영향을 미치며, 조직몰입을 경유하여 간접적으로도 조직성과에 영향을 주어 조직몰입도의 부분적 매개효과가 있음이 검증되었으나, 외부평가와 내부평가는 조직몰입과의 영향관계가 유의하지 못하여 매개효과 검증의 의미가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 연구결과가 시사하고 있는 점은 공정하고 수용성 있는 평가지표 개발 및 성과지향 보수체계에 대한 제도운영 정책을 회사, 노조 및 직원 모두의 지혜를 모아 수립하여 시행한다면 성과지향보수제도가 회사에 대한 직원들의 애사심 고취 및 조직성과를 향상시켜 국민과 정부에게 신뢰받는 진정한 공기업으로서의 역할을 할 수 있게 된다는 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Shin Hyeonho, The Effect of Organizational Effectiveness about Distributive and Procedural Justice in the Permeance-based Payment of Public Corporations, Labour Studies, vol. 19, pp. 127-169, 2010.
  2. Gyu-Chang Yu, Woo-Sung Park, Determinants and Organizational Effectiveness of Performance-based Human Resource Management, Korean Journal of Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 187-224, 2007.
  3. Kim Jun-Seok, Kim Min-Sun, Testing the Casual Relationship Between Employee Commitment and Work Performance: The Case of Fire Rescuer's at Local Fire Departments in Gyeonggi-Do, GRI, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5-22, 2009.
  4. Dong Won Kim, The Effect of Justice Perception with regard to Pay-for-Performance on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment, Korean Governance Review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 199-222, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2013.20.3.008
  5. Ministry of Labour, Seoul, Survey on Annual Salary for Performance & Pay-for-Performance, 2003.
  6. Kendrick, J. W., Group financial incentive: An evaluation. In H. R. Nalbantian(Ed.), Incentive, cooperation, and risking risk sharing: pp. 120-136, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1987.
  7. Yu, Hoon, Control System Transformation of Government Investment Agency, Korean Journal of Public Administration, vol. 35, no. 2, SNU Graduate School of Public Administration, 1997.
  8. Yeon Cheon, Oh, Review of Evaluation System for Public Enterprise Performance and the System's Future, Korean Journal of Public Administration, vol. 34, no. 1, SNU Graduate School of Public Administration, 1996.
  9. Lee, Suk-Hwan, Cho, Joo-Yoen, the Study on Receptiveness to Performance Appraisal System based on BSC among Public Employees at the Local Level Governments, Korean Society and Public Administration, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 269-291, 2010.
  10. Kantor, R. M., Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian Communities, American Sociological Review, vol. 33, pp. 499-517, 1968. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092438
  11. Buchanan, B. II., Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Manager in Work Organization, Adminastrative Science Quarterly : pp. 530-536, 1974.
  12. Mowday, R., Porter, L., & Steers, R., The Measurement of Organizational Commitment, Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 14, pp. 224-247, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
  13. Lee, Yong-Woon, An Empirical Study on the Development of Organizational Commitment Measurement, Korean Journal of Management, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 165-192, 1997.
  14. Lee, Hee-Tae, The Effect of Public Officials' Pay-For-Performance Satisfaction Upon Wage Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment, The Korean Governance Review, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 139-166, 2010. https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2010.17.2.007
  15. Dyer, L., & Reeves, T., Human resource strategies and firm performance: What do we know and where do we need to go? Paper presented at the 10th World Congress of the International Industrial Relations Association, Washington, DC.
  16. Rogers, W. M., & Wright, P. M., Measuring organizational performance in strategic human resource management: Problem, prospects, and performance information markets. Human Resource Management Review, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 311-336, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(98)90007-9
  17. Dong-Bae Kim, In-jae Lee, Ji-ye Jang, Profit-Sharing and Firm Performance: The Effect of Organizational Context and Plan Characteristics, Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 111-140, 2006.
  18. Heneman R. L., Merit pay: Linking pay increases to performance ratings. Boston MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1992.
  19. Pearce, J. L., Why merit pay doesn't work: Implications from organizational theory. In D. B. Balkin & L. R. Gomez-Mejia(Eds.). New perspectives on compensation: pp. 169-178, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1987.
  20. Long, R. J., Employee Profit Sharing: Consequences and Moderators. Industrial Relations. vol. 55, no. 3, pp. pp. 477-504, 2000. https://doi.org/10.7202/051329ar
  21. Kruse, D. L., Profit Sharing and Productivity: Microeconomic Evidence from the United States. Economic Journal 102(setp.), pp. 24-36, 1992. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234849
  22. Bhargava, S., Profit Sharing and the Financial Performance of Companies: Evidence from U.K. Panel Data. Economic Journal 104(sept.), pp. pp. 1044-1056, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235063
  23. Porter, L. W. Bigley, G. A. & Steers, R. M., Motiviation and Work Behavior, 7th ed. NY: McGraw-Hill, pp. 15-17, 2003.
  24. Lee, Suk-Hwan, The Theoretical study on the introduction of Five-day workweek and the organization commitment : Public and Private Sector in a Relatively Perspective, A paper in the Summer Conference of co-hosted Korean Public Administration Review & The Korean Association for Policy Studies, pp. 573-584, 2003.
  25. Lee, S-H & D. Oshfski., Employee Commitment and Firefighters: It's may job, Public Administration Review, vol. 62(Special Issue), pp. 108-114, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.62.s1.19
  26. Press release, Annual-Pay-for-Performance of Public Enterprise, significantly expanding the General Staff, Ministry of Strategy and Finance, 2016.
  27. Yeo-Jin, Kang, Kwi-Hee, Bae, A study of the effectiveness of Pay-for-performance in public enterprise: Focusing on Stakeholder's perception Related to pay-for-performance, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 226-228, 2012.
  28. Kim, Jae-Hoon, Choi, Heung-Suk, Chung, Jae-Jin, Survey on the Management of Public Bodies & the Development Plan, Korean Public Administration Review, pp. 297-309, Ministry of Planning and Budgeting, 2007.
  29. Lee, Chang-Dai, Kim, Soon-Kee, An Empirical Investigation on the Use of Measures in Performance Measurement and Reward Systems, Journal of DEAHAN Association of Business Administration, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 267-296, 2005.