Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Models of Architectural Design Pedagogy and Design Studio

건축설계 교수법 및 스튜디오 모델에 관한 연구

  • Ku, Bon-Deok (School of Architecture, Yeungnam University)
  • Received : 2017.01.15
  • Accepted : 2017.02.21
  • Published : 2017.02.28
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to extract and classify the models of architectural design pedagogy by their characteristics. The scope and procedures of the study are as follows; (1) To identify the changing approach of teaching architectural design and the problems of traditional and existing architectural design pedagogy through the literature research. (2) To suggest the basic framework for categorizing the various design pedagogy models from the viewpoint of their characteristics. Finally, (3) To extract 12 design pedagogy models; $\bullet$synectics model $\bullet$typology model $\bullet$pattern-form model $\bullet$space-composition model $\bullet$conjecture-test model $\bullet$analysis-synthesis model $\bullet$behavioral model $\bullet$socio-context model $\bullet$constructivist model $\bullet$sustainable design model $\bullet$tectonic model $\bullet$digital fabric model. At this time, many of these models represent their pedagogic features well, but some models represent design studio features rather than pedagogy itself. These models could be complemented through the succeeding questionary research. And the results of the study could be used as a basic data for improving the architectural education.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Axelrod J.(1964). The University Teacher as an Artist, SanFrancisco Jossey-Bass, 1-10
  2. Bairstow A., Roaf S.(2008). The Oxford Conference (A Re-Evaluation of Education in Architecture), WIT Press,
  3. Bilello J.(2005). Change vs Enduring Challenges of Practice & Education, ACSA Annual Meeting Report, March 2. 2005
  4. Bothwell S.(2004). Windsor Forum on Design Education, New Urban Press, 57-93
  5. Buchanan P.(1989). What is wrong with Architectural Education? Architectural Review, July 1989, 24-26
  6. Burgess P.(1981). Political Knowledge and the Architecture Studio. JAE, 34(3), 27
  7. Crysler C.(1995). Critical Pedagogy and Architectural Education, JAE 48(4) 208-215
  8. Koh J.(1982). Ecological Design. Landscape Journal, 1(2), 76-84 https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.1.2.76
  9. Ku, B.(1989). A Study on the Form-Generating Process and relevant Techniques from the viewpoint of Architectural Design Methodology, Doctoral Thesis, Hanyang Univ, 20-79
  10. Ku, B.(2013). A Case Study of Architectural Design Education based on Discovery Learning, JAIK, Planning & Design Section, 29(2), 105-114
  11. Ku, B.(2016). A Study on Characteristics of Architectural Design Education from the viewpoint of Pedagogy, JAIK, JAIK, Planning & Design Section, 32(3), 33-42
  12. Mallgrave H. F.(2006). Architectural Theory(vol. 1), Blackwell Publishing, 6
  13. Lee, S.(2005). Theories and History of Pedagogy of Architectural Design Studio, Research Report, Korea Research Institute, 49
  14. Lee, Sun(2012). Sustainable Architecture Studio, Architectural Education Seminar Report, AIK, 28-55
  15. Park, et al(2011). History & Philosophy of Education, Dong-mun sa, 454-457
  16. Plowright P. D.(2014). Revealing Architectural Design, Routledge, 33-47
  17. Quayle M.(1985). Ideabook for Teaching Design, PDA Publisher 9
  18. Salama A.(1995). New Trends in Architectural Education : Designing the Studio, Tailored Text Publishing 40
  19. Simon M.(2012). Design Pedagogy: Changing Approach to Teaching Design, Architecture School, MIT Press, 282-283