DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Role and Function of the Information Public Law

  • Received : 2016.07.27
  • Accepted : 2017.01.31
  • Published : 2017.01.31

Abstract

As a 'network of networks,' the Internet globally connects a huge number of regional and individual networks and provides us with new hopes and possibilities. However, a nation-state as well as the legal order of the 'state'(constitution) has limitations that are all too clear in order to regulate this new world formed by the Internet. It will soon be impossible for a single state to control these global information networks, and they will not be consistently and vertically operated and managed by anyone. As a result, ideologies or jurisdictions that support the legal order of a nation-state are no longer sufficient to control information delivery beyond borders. Furthermore, the development of the Internet and emergence of cyber space in the information society has led to the idea of 'extinction' of nation-states. Nevertheless, the conclusion that the state will be extinct due to the development of the information society is still nothing more than a hasty assumption. In other words, the information society does not indicate the end of the state. Rather, we must now clearly perceive that the object of our research and discussions must be the role and function of the nation-state in the newly emerged information society in the global aspect and international aspect, as well as in relationships with individuals or organizations that now have unimaginably strong information power. It is clear at this point that nation-states will lose the function and authority they have enjoyed or exercised to a certain degree, but this certainly does not indicate that nation-states are, and will be, unnecessary or useless. Rather, it is necessary to focus on the list of tasks that must be accepted by nation-states in the changed information society, as well as responsibilities and means to perform those tasks.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim Min-ho and Kim Jeong-joon, "A research on the new paradigm of administrative law in the knowledge-information society," Public Law Journal, Vol.8 No.3, p.444.
  2. Michael Kloepfer, Informationsrecht, C. H. Beck, p.23, 2002.
  3. Kim Il-hwan, "Die Untersuchung über das Neue Paradigm für die verfassungsrechtliche Informationsordnung," Constitutional Law, Vol. 7. No. 1, p. 207, 2001.
  4. Kim Il-Hwan, "A Study on the contents and the direction of the Constitutional Amendment in the Knowledge-Information Society," World Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 15 No. 2, p. 267, 2009.
  5. Kim Il-Hwan, "Die Untersuchung über die Rolle und Funktion des Verfassungsrechts in der hoch entwickelten technologischen Gesellschaft," Public Land Law Review, Vol. 37 No. 2, p. 290, 2007.
  6. Castell/Translated by Park Haeng-woong, The Internet Galaxy, Hanul Academy, 2004.
  7. Vogelsang, Compaine/Translated by Hyeon Kyeong-bo, Lee Seung-seon, Cho Young-shin, The Internet Upheaval, Hanul Academy, 2003.
  8. Jack Goldsmith, Tim Wu/Translated by Song Yeon-seok, Who Controls the Internet? NEWRUN, 2006.
  9. Kim Il-hwan, "Die Untersuchung über das Neue Paradigm für die verfassungsrechtliche Informationsordnung," Constitutional Law, Vol. 7. No. 1, p. 227, 2001.
  10. Robert B. Reich/Translated by Nam Kyeong-woo et al., The Work of Nations, Kachi, p.265, 1994.
  11. Jorg Ennuschat, "Aufgabe und Funktion des Verfassungsrechts in der hoch entwickelten Technologiegesellschaft," SUNGKYUNKWAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LAW, Vol. 1, p. 3, Spring 2007.
  12. Hong Seok-han, "A Study on the Regulated Self-Regulation responding to the Changing Roles of a State," Sungkyunkwan University Doctoral Dissertation, p.73, 2008.
  13. Claudio Franzius, "Der Gewahrleistungsstaat -Ein neues Leitbild fur den sich wandelnden Staat?," Der Staat, Duncker & Humblot, p. 504, 2003.
  14. Christof Gramm, Privatisierung und notwendige Staatsaufgaben, Duncker & Humblot, p. 29, 2001.
  15. Bushman, B. J. & Anderson, C. A., "Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation," American Psychologist, vol.56, p.477-489, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.6-7.477
  16. Anderson, C. A. & Dill, K. E., "Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.78, p.772-790, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.772
  17. Claudio Franzius, "Der Gewahrleistungsstaat -Ein neues Leitbild fur den sich wandelnden Staat?," Der Staat Bd. 42 Heft. 4, p.515, 2003.
  18. Kim Il-Hwan, "A Study on the contents and the direction of the Constitutional Amendment in the Knowledge-Information Society," World Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 15 No. 2, p. 272, 2009.
  19. Baek Soo Won, "A Study on the Constitutional Principle of Transparency," Sungkyunkwan University Doctoral Dissertation, p.62, 2011.
  20. Kim Il-Hwan, "A Study on the contents and the direction of the Constitutional Amendment in the Knowledge-Information Society," World Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 15 No. 2, p. 269, 2009.
  21. Kim Il-Hwan, "Die Untersuchung uber die Rolle und Funktion des Verfassungsrechts in der hoch entwickelten technologischen Gesellschaft," Public Land Law Review, Vol. 37 No. 2, p. 298, 2007.
  22. Kim Il-hwan, "A constitutional analysis for legal protection and use of personal information," Constitutional Law, Vol. 17. No. 2, p. 363, 2011.
  23. Spiros Simitis, op. cit., p.145.
  24. Jang Yeo-gyoung, "Information Communications Technology and Cyber Rights, Korea Human Rights Foundation," Repression of Daily Life and Human Rights of Minority, Saram Saenggak, p.625, 2000.
  25. Hong, Seok Han, "A Study on the PFI for Social Infrastructure and Fundamental Rights," Study on The American Constitution Institution of American Constitution, Vol.23 No.2, p. 272, 2012.
  26. Park Sangdon, "A Study on Constitutional State Responsibility for Infomation and Telecommunications Infrastructure," Sungkyunkwan University Doctoral Dissertation, p. 24, , 2011.
  27. Hong, Seok Han, "A Study on the PFI for Social Infrastructure and Fundamental Rights," Study on The American Constitution Institution of American Constitution, Vol.23 No.2, p. 280, 2012.
  28. Kim Il-hwan, Study on Constitutional Grounds and Protection of Informational Self-determination Public Law, Vol.29 No.3, p.87, 2001.
  29. Kim Il-hwan, "Research on Improvement of Protecting Personal Informations in National Education Information System(NEIS)," Sungkyunkwan University legal Institute, vol. 17, from p.25, 2005.
  30. Kim Il-hwan, "Das Verhaltnis zwischen dem automatisierte Abrufverfahren und dem Recht auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung," Public Law, p.113, 2004.
  31. Kim Il-hwan, "Die Untersuchung uber das Form und den Typus des automatisierten Abrufverfahrens im E-Government," Sungkyunkwan University legal Institut,e vol 19, 2007.
  32. Evangelia Mitrou, "Die Entwicklung der institutionellen Kontrolle des Datenschutzes," Nomos, p.20, 1993.
  33. Fritz Ossenbuhl, Vorrang und Vorbehalt des Gesetzes, Isensee / Kirchhof (Hrsg.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts Bd. III, C. F. Muller, p.320, 1988.
  34. Carl-Eugen Eberle, Gesetzesvorbehalt und Parlamentsvorbehalt, DOV, p.490, 1984.
  35. Michael Kloepfer, Der Vorbehalt des Gesetzes im Wandel, JZ, p.696, 1984.
  36. Hong Seok-han, op. cit., p.40.
  37. Albrecht Langhart, "Rahmengesetz und Selbstregulierung, Schulthess Polygraphischer," Verlag Zurich, p.93, 1993.
  38. Georg Muller, "Rechtssetzung im Gewahrleistungsstaat," Max-Emanuel Geis.Dieter Lorenz (Hrsg.), Staat.Kirche.Verwaltung : Festschrift fur Hartmut Maurer zum 70. Geburtstag, C.H. Beck, pp.236-237, 2001.
  39. Kim Il-Hwan,, "Die Untersuchung uber die Rolle und Funktion des Verfassungsrechts in der hoch entwickelten technologischen Gesellschaft," Public Land Law Review, Vol. 37 No. 2, p. 302, 2007.
  40. Risk society was first used when discussing the characteristics of modern society in comparison with previous societies from the paper titled Risikogesellschaft - Auf dem Weg in einer andere Moderne, Suhrkamp (1986.9) by Ulrich Beck
  41. Lee Duk-in, "Information Risk Society and Functional Change of Criminal Laws", Criminal Policy, Vol. 14, No. 2, The Korean Association of Criminology, pp.212-216, December, 2002.
  42. Lee Gyeong-ryeol, "Coping with Invasion of Personal Information in Criminal Law," Korean Journal of Comparative Criminal Law, Vol. 12, No.2, Korean Association of Comparative Criminal Law, p 583-588
  43. December 2010 and as for the benefit and protection of the law, refer to "Critical Consideration of Changes in Roles of Criminal Law in Knowledge Information Society" by Park Gang-woo, Criminal Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1, The Korean Association of Criminology, pp. 89-94, June, 2004.
  44. Ha Tae-hun and Kang Dong-beom, "Duties of Criminal Laws and Measures in Information Society", the study of general law for information society (I) Information and Communication Institute, p. 271, June, 1997.
  45. Park Gang-woo, aforementioned paper, p. 94.