Acknowledgement
Supported by : 한국연구재단
References
- AISC.(2010). Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications (AISC-358). American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.
- AISC.(2010). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (AISC-341). American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.
- Atashzaban, A., Hajirasouliha, I., Jazany, R,A., & Izadinia, M.(2005). Optimum drilled flange moment resisting connections for seismic regions. Journal of Constructional Steel Research.
- AWS.(2009). Structural Welding Code-Seismic Supplement., AWS D1.8/D1.8M.
- Chi, W.M., Deierlein, G.G., & Ingraffea, A.R. (1997). Finite element Fracture Mecanics Investigation of Welded Beam-Column Connection. SAC Joint Venture, Report No. SACIBD-97-05, Sacramento, CA.
- ABAQUS Analysis User's Manual. (2010). Providence RI. Dassault System
- El-Tawil, S., Mikesell, T., Vidarsson, E., & Kunnath, S, K. (1998). Strength And Ductility Of FR Welded-Bolted Connections. SAC Joint Venture
- FEMA. (2000). Recommended Seismic Design Criteria For New Steel Moment Frame Buildings. SAC Joint Venture.
- Han, S.H., Moon, K.H., & Jung, J. (2014). Cyclic Performance of Welded Unreinforced Flange-Welded Web moment Connections. Earthq. Spectra, 30(4), 1663-1681 https://doi.org/10.1193/080212EQS250M
- Hancock, J, W., & Mackenzie, A, C. (1976). On the mechanisms of ductile failure in high-strength steels subjected to multi-axial stress-states. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 24 (2).
- Kaufmann, E, J., Metrovich, B., & Pense, A, W. (2001). Characterization of Cyclic Inelastic Strain Behavior on Properties of A572 Gr. 50 and A913 Gr. 50 Rolled Sections. Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems.
- Krawinkler, H., Gupta, A., Medina, R., & Luco, N. (2000). Loading histories for seismic performance testing of SMRF components and assemblies. SAC Joint Venture, Rep. No. SAC/BD-00/10, Sacramento, CA.
- Lee, D., Cotton, S, C., Hajjar, J, F., Dexter, R, J., Ye, Y., & Ojard, S, D. (2005). Cyclic behavior of steel moment-resisting connections reinforced by alternative column stiffener details I. Connection performance and continuity plate detailing. Engineering Journal.
- Lu, L.W., Ricles, J.M., & Fisher, J.W. (2000). Critical issues in achieving ductile behavior of welded moment connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. Jul;55,325-341 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00092-9
- Mao, C., Ricles, J., Lu, L, W., & Fisher, J. (2001). Effect of local details on ductility of welded moment connections. Journal of Structural engineering, 127(9).
- Malley J. (1998). SAC steel project: Summary of phase 1 testing investigation results. Engineering Structures. Apr-Jun; 20(4-6):300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00033-3
- Ricles, J, M., Mao, C., Lu, L, W., & Fisher, J, W. (2002). Inelastic cyclic testing of welded unreinforced moment connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4).
- Stojadinovic, B., Goel, S., Lee, K., Margarian, A., & Choi, J. (2000). Parametric Tests on Unreinforced Steel Moment Connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126:1(40). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(40)
Cited by
- Progressive Collapse-Resistant Rotational Capacity Evaluation of WUF-W Connection by Fracture Index Analysis vol.22, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2018.22.6.353