DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A randomized controlled clinical study of periodontal tissue regeneration using an extracellular matrix-based resorbable membrane in combination with a collagenated bovine bone graft in intrabony defects

  • Kim, Sulhee (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Chang, Hyeyoon (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Hwang, Jin wook (ESTeam Paris Sud, INSERM UMR-S 935, Paris-Sud University, Paris-Saclay University) ;
  • Kim, Sungtae (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Koo, Ki-Tae (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Il (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Seol, Yang-Jo (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Moo (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Ku, Young (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Rhyu, In-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2017.11.01
  • Accepted : 2017.12.19
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of regenerative therapy with a collagenated bone graft and resorbable membrane in intrabony defects, and to evaluate the effects of the novel extracellular matrix (ECM)-based membrane clinically and radiologically. Methods: Periodontal tissue regeneration procedure was performed using an ECM-based resorbable membrane in combination with a collagenated bovine bone graft in intrabony defects around the teeth and implants. A novel extracellular matrix membrane (NEM) and a widely-used membrane (WEM) were randomly applied to the test group and the control group, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography images were obtained on the day of surgery and 6 months after the procedure. Alginate impressions were taken and plaster models were made 1 week and 6 months postoperatively. Results: The quantity of bone tissue, the dimensional changes of the surgically treated intrabony defects, and the changes in width and height below the grafted bone substitutes showed no significant difference between the test and control groups at the 6-month examination. Conclusions: The use of NEM for periodontal regeneration with a collagenated bovine bone graft showed similar clinical and radiologic results to those obtained using WEM.

Keywords

References

  1. Paolantonio M. Combined periodontal regenerative technique in human intrabony defects by collagen membranes and anorganic bovine bone. A controlled clinical study. J Periodontol 2002;73:158-66. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.2.158
  2. Kiany F, Moloudi F. Amnion membrane as a novel barrier in the treatment of intrabony defects: a controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:639-47. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3590
  3. Becker J, Al-Nawas B, Klein MO, Schliephake H, Terheyden H, Schwarz F. Use of a new cross-linked collagen membrane for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects at titanium implants: a prospective, randomized-controlled double-blinded clinical multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:742-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01689.x
  4. Ortolani E, Quadrini F, Bellisario D, Santo L, Polimeni A, Santarsiero A. Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2015;51:229-35.
  5. Park JI, Yang C, Kim YT, Kim MS, Lee JS, Choi SH, et al. Space maintenance using crosslinked collagenated porcine bone grafted without a barrier membrane in one-wall intrabony defects. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014;102:1454-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33124
  6. Wikesjo UM, Lim WH, Thomson RC, Hardwick WR. Periodontal repair in dogs: gingival tissue occlusion, a critical requirement for GTR? J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:655-64. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00362.x
  7. Reynolds MA, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Branch-Mays GL, Gunsolley JC. The efficacy of bone replacement grafts in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:227-65. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.227
  8. Needleman I, Tucker R, Giedrys-Leeper E, Worthington H. A systematic review of guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infrabony defects. J Periodontal Res 2002;37:380-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0765.2002.01369.x
  9. Nevins ML, Camelo M, Lynch SE, Schenk RK, Nevins M. Evaluation of periodontal regeneration following grafting intrabony defects with bio-oss collagen: a human histologic report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:9-17.
  10. Nevins ML, Camelo M, Rebaudi A, Lynch SE, Nevins M. Three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic evaluation of periodontal regeneration: a human report of intrabony defects treated with Bio-Oss collagen. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:365-73.
  11. Slotte C, Lindfors N, Nannmark U. Surgical reconstruction of peri-implant bone defects with prehydrated and collagenated porcine bone and collagen barriers: case presentations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:714-23.
  12. Sheikh Z, Hamdan N, Ikeda Y, Grynpas M, Ganss B, Glogauer M. Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications: a review. Biomater Res 2017;21:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-017-0095-5
  13. Hwang JW, Kim S, Kim SW, Lee JH. Effect of extracellular matrix membrane on bone formation in a rabbit tibial defect model. BioMed Res Int 2016;2016:6715295.
  14. Jimenez Garcia J, Berghezan S, Carames JM, Dard MM, Marques DN. Effect of cross-linked vs non-cross-linked collagen membranes on bone: a systematic review. J Periodontal Res 2017;52:955-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12470
  15. Needleman IG, Worthington HV, Giedrys-Leeper E, Tucker RJ. Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD001724.
  16. Grimard BA, Hoidal MJ, Mills MP, Mellonig JT, Nummikoski PV, Mealey BL. Comparison of clinical, periapical radiograph, and cone-beam volume tomography measurement techniques for assessing bone level changes following regenerative periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 2009;80:48-55. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080289
  17. Schwarz F, Sahm N, Mihatovic I, Golubovic V, Becker J. Surgical therapy of advanced ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects: cone-beam computed tomographic and histological analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:939-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01739.x
  18. Sculean A, Stavropoulos A, Windisch P, Keglevich T, Karring T, Gera I. Healing of human intrabony defects following regenerative periodontal therapy with a bovine-derived xenograft and guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Investig 2004;8:70-4.
  19. Tonetti MS, Fourmousis I, Suvan J, Cortellini P, Bragger U, Lang NP, et al.. Healing, post-operative morbidity and patient perception of outcomes following regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:1092-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00615.x
  20. Chang H, Kim S, Hwang JW, Kim S, Koo KT, Kim TI, et al. Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017;47:165-73. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.3.165

Cited by

  1. Surgical Treatment of Periodontal Diseases-a Review of Current Clinical Research vol.6, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-019-00226-5