DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Associated with a Prolonged Length of Hospital Stay in Patients with Diabetic Foot: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

  • Choi, Sang Kyu (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Cheol Keun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital) ;
  • Jo, Dong In (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Myung Chul (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Seoul Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jee Nam (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Seoul Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Hyun Gon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Seoul Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Dong Hyeok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Seoul Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Soon Heum (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital)
  • Received : 2017.07.18
  • Accepted : 2017.10.31
  • Published : 2017.11.18

Abstract

Background We conducted this study to identify factors that may prolong the length of the hospital stay (LHS) in patients with diabetic foot (DF) in a single-institution setting. Methods In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated a total of 164 patients with DF, and conducted an intergroup comparison of their baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including sex, age, duration of diabetes, smoking status, body mass index, underlying comorbidities (e.g., hypertension or diabetic nephropathy), wound characteristics, type of surgery, the total medical cost, white blood cell (WBC) count, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and albumin, protein, glycated hemoglobin, and 7-day mean blood glucose (BG) levels. Results Pearson correlation analysis showed that an LHS of >5 weeks had a significant positive correlation with the severity of the wound (r=0.647), WBC count (r=0.571), CRP levels (r=0.390), DN (r=0.020), and 7-day mean BG levels (r=0.120) (P<0.05). In multiple regression analysis, an LHS of >5 weeks had a significant positive correlation with the severity of the wound (odds ratio [OR]=3.297; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.324-10.483; P=0.020), WBC count (OR=1.423; 95% CI, 0.046.0-356; P=0.000), CRP levels (OR=1.079; 95% CI, 1.015-1.147; P=0.014), albumin levels (OR=0.263; 95% CI, 0.113.3-673; P=0.007), and 7-day mean BG levels (OR=1.018; 95% CI, 1.001-1.035; P=0.020). Conclusions Surgeons should consider the factors associated with a prolonged LHS in the early management of patients with DF. Moreover, this should also be accompanied by a multidisciplinary approach to reducing the LHS.

Keywords

References

  1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1047-53. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047
  2. Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG. Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet 2003;361:1545-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13169-8
  3. Brem H, Sheehan P, Rosenberg HJ, et al. Evidence-based protocol for diabetic foot ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117(7 Suppl):193S-209S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000225459.93750.29
  4. Pemayun TGD, Naibaho RM. Clinical profile and outcome of diabetic foot ulcer, a view from tertiary care hospital in Semarang, Indonesia. Diabet Foot Ankle 2017;8:1312974. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000625X.2017.1312974
  5. Ragnarson Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. Health-economic consequences of diabetic foot lesions. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39 Suppl 2:S132-9. https://doi.org/10.1086/383275
  6. Mehta SS, Suzuki S, Glick HA, et al. Determining an episode of care using claims data. Diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1110-5. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.7.1110
  7. Wukich DK, Hobizal KB, Brooks MM. Severity of diabetic foot infection and rate of limb salvage. Foot Ankle Int 2013; 34:351-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100712467980
  8. Steed DL, Donohoe D, Webster MW, et al. Effect of extensive debridement and treatment on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers: Diabetic Ulcer Study Group. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:61-4.
  9. Grigoropoulou P, Eleftheriadou I, Jude EB, et al. Diabetic Foot Infections: an Update in Diagnosis and Management. Curr Diab Rep 2017;17:3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-017-0831-1
  10. Malhotra R, Chan CS, Nather A. Osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. Diabet Foot Ankle 2014;5.
  11. Sun JH, Tsai JS, Huang CH, et al. Risk factors for lower extremity amputation in diabetic foot disease categorized by Wagner classification. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;95:358-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.034
  12. Lee KM, Kim WH, Lee JH, et al. Risk factors of treatment failure in diabetic foot ulcer patients. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40:123-8. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.2.123
  13. Cheng H, Harris RC. Renal endothelial dysfunction in diabetic nephropathy. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets 2014;14:22-33. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871529X14666140401110841
  14. Lewis S, Raj D, Guzman NJ. Renal failure: implications of chronic kidney disease in the management of the diabetic foot. Semin Vasc Surg 2012;25:82-8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2012.04.007
  15. Margolis DJ, Hofstad O, Feldman HI. Association between renal failure and foot ulcer or lower-extremity amputation in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1331-6. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2244
  16. Marin-Penalver JJ, Martin-Timon I, Sevillano-Collantes C, et al. Update on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 2016;7:354-95. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v7.i17.354
  17. Puig J, Supervia A, Marquez MA, et al. Diabetes team consultation: impact on length of stay of diabetic patients admitted to a short-stay unit. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007;78: 211-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2007.03.010
  18. Winfield RD, Delano MJ, Dixon DJ, et al. Differences in outcome between obese and nonobese patients following severe blunt trauma are not consistent with an early inflammatory genomic response. Crit Care Med 2010;38:51-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b08089
  19. McDaniel JC, Browning KK. Smoking, chronic wound healing, and implications for evidence-based practice. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2014;41:415-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000057
  20. Steenvoorde P, Jacobi CE, Van Doorn L, et al. Maggot debridement therapy of infected ulcers: patient and wound factors influencing outcome-a study on 101 patients with 117 wounds. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:596-602. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588407X205404
  21. Tuttolomondo A, Maida C, Pinto A. Diabetic foot syndrome: immune-inflammatory features as possible cardiovascular markers in diabetes. World J Orthop 2015;6:62-76. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.62
  22. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2011. Diabetes Care 2011;34 Suppl 1:S11-61. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-S011
  23. Bhattacharya S, Mishra RK. Pressure ulcers: current understanding and newer modalities of treatment. Indian J Plast Surg 2015;48:4-16. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.155260
  24. Batista F, Augusto Magalhaes A, Gamba M, et al. Ten years of a multidisciplinary diabetic foot team approach in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Diabet Foot Ankle 2010;1:5203. https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v1i0.5203

Cited by

  1. Determinants of wound healing in patients hospitalized for diabetic foot ulcer: results from the MEDFUN study vol.54, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2478/enr-2020-0023