DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reconstruction of Medial Orbital Wall Fractures without Subperiosteal Dissection: The "Push-Out" Technique

  • Kim, Yong-Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jin Ho (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Youngsoo (Gami Plastic Surgery Clinic) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Eun (Jenith Plastic Surgery) ;
  • Chung, Kyu-Jin (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Ho (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae Gon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.11
  • 심사 : 2017.10.31
  • 발행 : 2017.11.18

초록

Background Various surgical methods for repairing medial orbital wall fractures have been introduced. The conventional technique requires total separation of the displaced orbital bones from the orbital soft tissues. However, subperiosteal dissection around the fracture can cause additional damage. The aim of the present study is to introduce a method of reconstructing medial orbital wall fractures without subperiosteal dissection named the "push-out" technique. Methods Six patients with post-traumatic enophthalmos resulting from an old medial orbital wall fracture and 10 patients with an acute medial orbital wall fracture were included. All were treated with the push-out technique. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) was performed to assess the correct positioning of the implants. The Hertel scale and a comparison between preoperative and postoperative orbital volume were used to assess the surgical results. Results Restoration of the normal orbital cavity shape was confirmed by examining the postoperative CT scans. In the old fracture group, the median orbital volume of the fractured side was $29.22cm^3$ preoperatively, and significantly improved postoperatively to a value of $25.13cm^3$. In the acute fracture group, the median orbital volume of the fractured side was $28.73cm^3$ preoperatively, and significantly improved postoperatively to a value of $24.90cm^3$. Differences on the Hertel scale also improved, from 2.13 mm preoperatively to 0.25 mm postoperatively in the old fracture group and from 1.67 mm preoperatively to 0.33 mm postoperatively in the acute fracture group. Conclusions The push-out technique can be considered a good alternative choice for old medial orbital wall fractures with posttraumatic enophthalmos, acute medial orbital wall fractures including large fractured bone segments, and single-hinged greenstick fractures.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi M, Flores RL. Medial orbital wall fractures and the transcaruncular approach. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:696-701. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dba84
  2. Kim YH, Kim TG, Lee JH, et al. Inlay implanting technique for the correction of medial orbital wall fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:321-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95cfd
  3. Lee MJ, Kang YS, Yang JY, et al. Endoscopic transnasal approach for the treatment of medial orbital blow-out fracture: a technique for controlling the fractured wall with a balloon catheter and Merocel. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:417-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200208000-00006
  4. Lim NK, Kang DH, Oh SA, et al. Orbital wall restoring surgery in pure blowout fractures. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41: 686-92. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.6.686
  5. Lee KM, Park JU, Kwon ST, et al. Three-dimensional pre-bent titanium implant for concomitant orbital floor and medial wall fractures in an East asian population. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:480-5. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.480
  6. Thiagarajah C, Kersten RC. Medial wall fracture: an update. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2009;2:135-9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1224775
  7. Sung YS, Chung CM, Hong IP. The correlation between the degree of enophthalmos and the extent of fracture in medial orbital wall fracture left untreated for over six months: a retrospective analysis of 81 cases at a single institution. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40:335-40. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.4.335
  8. Kim YH, Park Y, Chung KJ. Considerations for the management of medial orbital wall blowout fracture. Arch Plast Surg 2016;43:229-36. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.3.229
  9. Choi SH, Kang DH, Gu JH. The Correlation between the Orbital Volume Ratio and Enophthalmos in Unoperated Blowout Fractures. Arch Plast Surg 2016;43:518-22. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.518
  10. Choi KE, Lee J, Lee H, et al. The Paradoxical Predominance of Medial Wall Injuries in Blowout Fracture. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:e752-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002208
  11. Hur SW, Kim SE, Chung KJ, et al. Combined orbital fractures: surgical strategy of sequential repair. Arch Plast Surg 2015;42:424-30. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.424

피인용 문헌

  1. Delayed reconstruction of posttraumatic facial deformities vol.61, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2018.61.12.740
  2. The Incidence of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy Associated With Subtypes of Orbital Wall Fracture vol.33, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000008007