Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회지)

Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on Cost Structure and Management Performance of Poultry Farming in AgroForestry

산지양계복합경영의 비용구조와 경영성과 분석

  • Won, Hyun Kyu (Division of Forest industry Research, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Kim, Hae Soo (Division of Forest industry Research, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Jeon, Hyun Sun (Division of Forest industry Research, National Institute of Forest Science)
  • 원현규 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과) ;
  • 김혜수 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과) ;
  • 전현선 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과)
  • Received : 2017.09.25
  • Accepted : 2017.11.29
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to analyze differences in gross income between only forestry and agroforestry. In addition, cost structure and management performance on poultry farming was surveyed. The study sites were three forestry households located in Chungju, Kyungsan and Hwacheon. The method of its management performance were conducted by interview. And, survey items of the performance were operating expenses items and gross income items in 2015. As a result of study, gross income of Chungju business model was 25,608,000 won. The operating cost was 20,217,571 won so that the net income was 5,390,429 won. In case of Gyeongsan, gross income was 33,950,000 won and the operating cost was 18,655,714 won. Thus, the net income was 15,494,286 won. Hwacheon business model showed that gross income was 31,850,000 won, the operating cost was 13,143,000 won. Thus, the net income was 18,707,000 won. And, break-even point of sale volume, which meets cost, was 617 chicken in Chungju, 125 chicken in Gyeongsan, and 63 chicken in Hwacheon. In terms of selling cost-per-production ratio, Chungju business model was 79%, Kyungsan was 55% and Hwacheon was 41%. The results of this study indicates that margin ratio per chicken was 21% in Chungju, 45% in Kyungsan and 59% in Hwacheon. On Agroforestry, increasing rate for gross income was evaluated by 16% in Chungju, 18% in Gyeongsan and 11% Hwacheon.

본 연구는 유실수, 특용수, 산채 및 고로쇠 등을 주업으로 임업만 생산했을 경우와 자연순환농법으로 닭을 방사하여 키우는 산지양계와 결합한 복합경영일 경우의 조수입이 어느 정도 향상되었는지를 분석하였다. 연구대상지는 충청북도 충주시, 경상북도 경산시, 강원도 화천군에 위치하고 있는 3곳의 산지양계 복합경영 현장실연 임가이다. 그리고 현장 면담조사를 통해 2015년도 기준의 경영비와 조수입을 조사하여 산지양계의 비용구조와 경영성과를 비교 분석하였다. 연구결과, 충주는 조수입이 25,608,000원, 경영비가 20,217,571원으로 소득은 5,390,429원으로 분석되었고, 경산은 조수입이 33,950,000원, 경영비가 18,655,714원으로 소득은 15,494,286원인 것으로 나타났다. 화천은 조수입이 31,850,000원, 경영비가 13,143,000원으로 소득은 18,707,000원이었다. 그리고 판매량과 비용이 일치하는 손익분기 판매량은 충주는 617마리, 경산은 125마리, 화천은 63마리로 나타났다. 1마리당 가격에서 차지하는 원가율은 충주는 79%를 차지하였고, 경산은 55%, 화천은 41%를 차지하였고 이에 따른 마진율은 충주는 21%, 경산은 45%, 화천은 59%로 나타났다. 또한 산지양계복합경영의 소득효과는 조수입 기준으로 평가한 결과, 임업만 주업으로 할 때 보다 충주가 16%, 경산이 18% 그리고 화천이 11%로 증가한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jang, Y.K. 1996. Modern Business Analysis. MooYuck management Company. pp700.
  2. Garrett, H.E., et al. 2000. North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin.
  3. Jang, C.S. and Kim, Y.R. 2001. New land-use management: Agroforestry. Journal of Rural Economics 24(1): 125-140.
  4. Jang, C.S. and Lee, J.W. 2002. A Case Study on The Multi-management of Farms Cultivating Medicinal Plants in Forest. Journal of Rural Economics 8(2): 21-32.
  5. Jung, B.H., Kim, J.S., Kim, H.G. and Kim, E.G, 2011. A Study on the Importance-Performance Analysis for National Forest Complex Management. Journal of Agriculture and Life Science 45(6): 33-40.
  6. Kang, M.S. and Shim, H.S. 2014. Analysis on Newspaper Cost and Break-even Point for Purpose of Determining Newspaper Ad Rate. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations 8(3): 64-90.
  7. Kim, J,H., Park, K.T., Kim, B.Y., Kang, S.G. Lee, J.K. and Sung, K.I. 2004. The Development of Model and Application Technology for Agroforestry. pp. 799.
  8. Lee, Y.H. 2013. Economic Potential and Policy Implications of Agroforestry form US Agroforestry Cases. Korean Journal of Forest Economics 20(1): 47-58.
  9. Min, K.T. and Kim, M.E. 2014. Current Status and Policy Implication of Agroforestry in South Korea. Korean Journal of Forest Economics 103(1): 122-128. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2014.103.1.122
  10. National Institute of Forest Science. 2017. Study on Technology of Environment-Friendly Livestock industry using Woody Resources. pp. 70.
  11. National Institute of Forest Science. 2016. Manuals of Environment-Friendly Poultry Farming in Mountain Area. pp. 21.
  12. Park, Y.B., Kim, J.S. and Kim, K.D. 2011. Investment Beneficial Analysis of Culture of Mountain Medicinal Plant Resources: Open field Culture of Schizandra. Journal of Korean Forest Society 99(6): 808-815.
  13. Park, S.B., Kim, M.J., Park, Y.M., Hwang, S.I. and Kim, E.G. 2012. Profitability Analysis for Ligularia fischeri Forest Farming. Journal of Korean Forest Society 101(3): 426-433.
  14. Park, S.B., Kim, M.J. and Kim, E.G. 2014. Comparison of Profitability for Allium victorialis Farming System between On-field and Under-forest. Journal of Korean Forest Society 101(3): 426-433.
  15. Son, C.H. and Seok, H.D. 2006. Current Status and Policy performance of Agroforestry. Journal of Rural Economics. 29(1): 135-150.
  16. Sung, K.C. and Seo, J.W. 2004. Income Enhancement Measures of Mountain Area by using Agroforestry. Korean Journal of Forest Economics 12(1): 32-45.
  17. Yoo, B.I., Sung, K.C., Seo, J.W. and Jeon, J.H. 2004. A status and analysis of agroforestry in Korea. KFRI Journal of Forest Science 67: 125-138.