한국산림과학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science)

  • 제106권4호
  • /
  • Pages.441-449
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2586-6613(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-6621(eISSN)
한국산림과학회 (Korean Society of Forest Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

선도산림경영단지의 산주참여 확대 방안

Measures for Activating Participation of Private Forest Owners in Leading Forest Management Zone

  • 김영환 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과) ;
  • 배재수 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과) ;
  • 조민우 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과)
  • Kim, Young-Hwan (Division of Forest Industry Research, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Bae, Jae-Soo (Division of Forest Industry Research, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Cho, Min-Woo (Division of Forest Industry Research, National Institute of Forest Science)
  • 투고 : 2017.07.31
  • 심사 : 2017.09.22
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

사유림 경영 활성화를 위해서는 산주들의 참여가 매우 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 선도산림경영단지 내 산주들의 참여를 확대할 수 있는 방안을 찾고자 하였다. 이를 위해 선도산림경영단지 내 산주들을 대상으로 심층 인터뷰를 실시하여 참여수준을 파악하고 Arnstein의 주민참여 8단계 이론을 적용하여 산주들의 참여수준을 분석하였다. 연구결과 선도산림경영단지 산주들의 참여수준은 형식적인 단계에 머물러 있으며 의사결정 과정에 미치는 영향력이 매우 제한적인 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 제도적으로 산주들이 단지 운영을 위한 의사결정과정에 참여할 수 있도록 산주협의체를 제도화하고 선도산림경영단지 산림경영 담당자와의 파트너십 체결을 제안하였다. 다만 본 연구에서는 단지 운영에 적극적인 일부 소재 산주를 대상으로 심층인터뷰를 실시함으로써 전체 선도산림경영단지 참여 산주들의 의견을 대표하는 데에는 다소 한계가 있다.

Participation of forest owners is essential for effective management of private forests. This study aimed to find a measure to activate participation of private forest owners in the Leading Forest Management Zone (LFMZ). In-depth interview was conducted to check the participation level of forest owners within the LFMZ and the participation level was evaluated based on the Arnstein's eight-rungs theory in this study. The results showed that the participation of private forest owners in the LFMZ is perfunctory and their influence in the decision-making process is quite limited. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a system in which forest owners can involve in the decision-making process in an official manner. In this study, we suggested to make a partnership between local forest manager and private forest owners to discuss management activities and budgets in the LFMZ. However, since only a few active private forest owners were surveyed in this study, it is hard to consider their opinions as those of whole forest owners in the LFMZ.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. An, H.C. 1983. A Study on the Private Forest Owners' Attitude toward Forest Practices in the Agricultural and Mountain Villages. Journal of Jinju National Agriculture and Forest Technology College 21: 141-153.
  2. An, K.W. and Shin, S.H. 2004. A Study on the Consciousness of Proxy Management in Private Forest. Korean Journal of Forest Economics 12(2): 14-24.
  3. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 5(4): 216-224.
  4. Boseong County. 2014. Basic Plan of Boseong Leading Forest Management Zone. Boseong County, Republic of Korea.
  5. Bruna-Garcia, X. and Marey-Perez, M.F. 2014. Public Participation: A Need of Forest Planning. iForest 7: 216-226. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0979-007
  6. Geochang County. 2015. Basic Plan of HOUMSAN Leading Forest Management Zone. Geochang County, Republic of Korea.
  7. Han, W.T. 1992. Urban and Local Administration. Bobmusa Press, Seoul.
  8. Hongcheon County. 2014. Basic Plan of Hongcheon Leading Forest Management Zone. Hongcheon County, Republic of Korea.
  9. Hongseong County. 2015. Basic Plan of Hongseong Leading Forest Management Zone. Hongseong County, Republic of Korea.
  10. Japan Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2016. The 90th Statistical Yearbook of Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Japan Statistics Department.
  11. Jinan County. 2014. Basic Plan of Jinan Leading Forest Management Zone. Jinan County, Republic of Korea.
  12. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2015a. 2015 Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  13. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2015b. Guideline for compilation of the budget and establishment of Leading Forest Management Zone. Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  14. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2015c. Report on Private Forest Owners' Perception. Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  15. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2016. Program for Revitalizing Private Forest Management, Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  16. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2017. Status of Forest Roads in Major Foreign Countries. http://www.forest.go.kr.
  17. Kim, H.S., Kim, S.I. and Lee, S.H. 2015. An Attitude of Forest Owners and Importance-Performance Analysis for Management-Scale Improvement on Private Forests. Journal of Agriculture and Life Science 49(6): 57-63.
  18. Republic of Korea. 2015. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution. http://unfccc.int.
  19. Samcheok City. 2015. Basic Plan of HAJANG Leading Forest Management Zone. Samcheok City, Republic of Korea.
  20. Seo, Y.W. and Choi, J.C. 2000. Study on Relating a Government Support to the Private Forest Management. Journal of Forest Science of Kangwon National University 16: 103-116.
  21. Seo, Y.W. and Choi, J.C. 2001. Comparison of the Determinants Affecting Forest Investment by the Type of Private Forest Land Owners. Journal of Korean Forest Society 90(5): 643-649.
  22. Suncheon City. 2015. Basic Plan of Suncheon Leading Forest Management Zone. Suncheon City, Republic of Korea.
  23. Ulju County. 2015. Basic Plan of Ulju Leading Forest Management Zone. Ulju County, Republic of Korea.
  24. Verba, S. 1967. Democratic Participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 373(1): 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271626737300103
  25. Yoo, S.Y. 2005. A Study on Residents Participation in Process of Land Development Conducted by the Public Sector. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements 47: 125-144.
  26. Zimmerman, J.F. 1986. Participatory Democracy: Populism Revived. Praeger, New York, USA.