DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Elements(MORT-TAC) of Situation Assessment at Disaster Sites

재난현장 상황평가 고려요소(MORT-TAC)에 관한 연구

  • 김성근 (동국대학교 대학원 경영정보학과) ;
  • 이영재 (동국대학교 경영대학 경영정보학과)
  • Received : 2016.10.26
  • Accepted : 2017.01.20
  • Published : 2017.01.28

Abstract

Even well trained personnel may fall victim to panic, and a wrong assessment of the situation can turn a small accident into a huge disaster. At the disaster site, the event is commonly broadcasted in real time and is unfiltered. Thus, the commander of the site must be able to accurately assess the scene while not missing out on key considerations. Despite the necessity of good situational assessment, there is barely any research on this topic. This study utilizes METT-TC(Mission, Enemy, Troops, Terrain and weather, Time available, and Civil considerations) which is used by militaries to assess combat situations, and proposes MORT-TAC(Mission, Object, Resources available, Terrain and weather, Time available, Ability, and Civil considerations) as factors to consider in effectively controlling the disaster site. The standard model is used for assessing disaster scenes by applying the Delphi analytical method on each sub-factor of MORT-TAC.

평소에 잘 훈련된 요원도 재난현장에 도착하면 일순간 공황에 빠져서 상황평가를 잘못하여 단순한 사고가 대형재난으로 발전하기도 한다. 특히 오늘날 재난발생 시 현장지휘관은 국민의 알권리와 언론의 집중적인 관심으로 인하여 재난현장이 실시간대에 미디어를 통하여 생중계되는 관계로 비전문적인 재난현장 관계관들은 설 땅이 없게 되었다. 따라서 재난현장 관계관들이 전문성있고 필수 고려사항을 누락함 없이 재난현장 상황평가를 실시할 수 있는 역량은 그 어느 때보다 요구된다. 그러나 재난현장 상황평가 고려요소는 그 필요성에도 불구하고, 관련 연구가 미흡한 실정이다. 이런 점을 감안하여 본 논문은 군사 분야에서 전투현장 상황평가 시 활용하고 있는 METT-TC(Mission, Enemy, Troops, Terrain and weather, Time available, and Civilian considerations)를 준용하여, 일반 재난현장에서 효과적인 상황평가 고려요소로 MORT-TAC(Mission, Object, Resources available, Terrain and weather, Time available, Ability, and Civilian considerations)를 제안하기 위함이다. 또한 MORT-TAC 각 요소별 세부 하위요소를 델파이 조사기법을 활용하여 재난현장 상황평가 표준모델을 제시하였는데 재난관계관들의 많은 활용을 기대해 본다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Defense, "Haman Disaster, White Paper on the National Defense Disaster Response", 2012.
  2. Geo-Rae Jang, Chang-Sup Chun, Moonsup Lim, Sanghwan Seo,, "Research on Developing Decision Making Model of Disaster Field Commander", 26th National Safety 119 Fire-Fighting Policy Conference, Sejong Fire Company Headquarter , 2014.
  3. Sung-Geun Kim, Gyeong-Tae Hwang, "Research on Effective On-Spot Control of Disaster Scene: Lessons of Sinking of Sewol", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 11, No. 12, 2014.
  4. Quarantelli, E. L., "What is disaster: the need for clalification in definition and Conceptualization in Research Artical #177, University of Delaware, DRC, 1985. pp. 43-52.
  5. Department of Public Safety, R&D on Korean Response and Control System of Disaster Scene, Dong-Guk University Academia-Industry Cooperative Group, 2015.
  6. Division of national sicurity, "Disaster and sicurity management na organic law", R.O.K. the law No. 12943, 2014.
  7. Keum-Young Min, "Research on the Impact of Big Data Attributes to Dicision-Making in Disaster Response", a docter's thesis of Dongguk University, 2013.
  8. http://www.unisdr.org/eng/library/lib"terminology"eng.htm.
  9. Young-Jai Lee, Sung-Geun Kim, Hong-Kue Son, Research on Development of Koreanstyle Disaster Site about Responseness. Recovery Standard System, a report of the Ministry of Public Safety and Security, 2015.
  10. Ja-Won Goo, "Concept of Situational Management and Peacetime Application to Field Units", Military Critique 429th Issue, 2014.
  11. Endsley, M. R., "Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems", Human Factors, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1995.
  12. Gi-Wok Lee, "Effective Command System on Disaster Scene", Busan University Administrative Grad School Master's Thesis, 1999.
  13. Joon-Suk Ahn, "Research on Establishing Korean Disaster Response System", Kangwon University Master's Thesis, 2004.
  14. Gi-Geun Yang, "Possible Revisions on Disaster Scene Command System for Better Response: In Comparative Perspective of Korea and US", Sociology Research 34th Edition 3rd Issue, 2008.
  15. M. C. Libicki & S. E. Johnson(Eds), Dominant Battlespace Knowledge, CCRP Publications, Washington, D.C., publications@dodccrp.org, 1996.
  16. ROK Army Headquarter, Commander and Staff Task, Field Manual 0-6, 2012.
  17. ROK Army Training & Doctrine Command, Real-Time Command of Combat Operations, Training Supplementary Manual 08-3-20, 2009.
  18. ROK Army, Tactics, Field Manual 0-1, 2013.
  19. ROK Army Training & Doctrine Command, Troops Commanding Procedures, Training Manual 07-6-8, 2007.
  20. Seong-Yong No, "Delphi Technique: Predicting the Future with Professional Insight", Korean Research Institute for Human Settlements, 2006.
  21. Jong-Seong Lee, Research Method 21: Delphi Technique, Seoul: Educations and Research Department, 2001.
  22. Disaster Preparedness Training Programme, "Disaster Energency Needs Assessnent", International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, 2000.
  23. Maya ARII, "Rapid Assessment in Disaster", JMAJ, Janeary/February 2013-Vol.56. No1, 2013.
  24. R. S. Stephenson, "Disaster Assessnent", Disaster Management Training Programme, 1994.
  25. Sung-Jo. Han, "Analysis of Relative Combat Power with Expert System", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 143-150, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.6.143