Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Influence of Paternalistic Leadership on Organizational Commitment -The Mediating Effect of Organizational Identification-

가장적 리더십이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향 - 조직 동일시의 매개효과를 중심으로 -

  • 왕환환 (부산대학교 경영학과 인사조직전공) ;
  • 김종관 (부산대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2016.12.27
  • Accepted : 2017.02.20
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper aims to regard paternalistic leadership as research object, introduces organizational identification as intermediary variable to find out the impact on organizational commitment, using a sample of 406 employees from enterprises. Results showed that first, authoritarianism had no impact on organizational commitment, while benevolence and morality related positively to organizational commitment. Second, paternalistic leadership had positive effect on organizational identification. Third, organizational identification mediated the relationship between morality and organizational commitment, but did not mediate the relationship between benevolence and organizational commitment. Limitations of the study, and implications of the findings are discussed.

본 연구에서는 부산지역 MBA 과정을 다니는 직장인 및 그들의 동료들 총 406명을 연구 대상으로 조직몰입이 가장적 리더십 및 조직 동일시에 의하여 결정된다는 것을 분석함으로써 한국 기업에서의 가장적 리더십의 중요성을 제시하고 있다. 이를 위하여 본 연구는 가장적 리더십이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향과 가장적 리더십과 조직몰입관계에서 조직 동일시의 매개효과를 검증하였다. 실증분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가장적 리더십의 요인 중에 권위주의는 조직몰입과 유의하지 않으며 자비심은 가치적 몰입에 정(+)의 영향, 도덕성은 조직몰입에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 가장적 리더십은 조직 동일시에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 가장적 리더십과 조직몰입의 관계에서 조직 동일시는 도덕성과 조직몰입 간의 관계를 매개하였으나 자비심과 근속적 몰입 간의 관계에서 매개효과가 나타나지 않았다. 연구결과를 바탕으로 시사점과 연구의 한계점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. K. I. Kim, J. Y. Park, "Cultural differences impact on the ERP system implementation", Journal of Convergence Society for SMB, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-9, 2016.
  2. B. S. Cheng, L. F. Chou, J. L. Farh, "A triad model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement", Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, Vol. 14, pp. 3-64, 2000.
  3. J. L. Farh, B. S. Cheng, "A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations", Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, Vol. 4, pp. 84-127.
  4. E. K. Pellegrini, T. A. Scandura, "Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research", Journal of Management, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 566-593, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316063
  5. B. S. Cheng, L. F. Chou, M. P. Huang, J. L. Farh, S. Q. Peng, "The ternary model of paternalistic leadership: Evidence from mainland China. Idigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies", Vol. 20, pp. 209-250, 2003.
  6. B. S. Cheng, L. F. Chou, T. Y. Wu, M. P. Huang, J. L. Farh, "Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations." Asia Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 7, pp. 89-117, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2004.00137.x
  7. M. Li, P. Wang, L. Wang, "The relationship among burnout and conscientiousness, autonomy and psychological work maturity", Advances in Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 61-67, 2013. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2013.32010
  8. B. M. Bass, B. J. Avolio, L. Alwater, "The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women", An International Review, Vol. 45, No. l, pp. 5-34, 1996.
  9. B. J. Avolio, W. L. Gardner, F. O. Walumbwa, F. Luthans, D. R. May, "Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors", The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 801-823, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
  10. R. F. Russell, "The role of values in servant leadership", Leadership Organization Development Journal, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 76-84. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730110382631
  11. J. A. Arnold, S. Arad, J. A. Rhoades, F. Drasgow, "The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors", Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21, pp.249-269, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO;2-#
  12. D. M. Mayer, K. Aquino, R. L. Greenbaum, M. Kuenzi, "Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification", Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13, pp. 103-123, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
  13. Z. Aycan, "Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization", In Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context", Eds. U. Kim, K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, London: Cambridge Univ, Ch.20. pp. 445-466. 2006.
  14. Y. Xu, "Authoritarianism: Theory, development and dilemma", Political Science Research, Vol. 12, pp. 83-91. 2013.
  15. Z. Aycan, R. N. Kanungo, JB. P. Sinha, "Organizational culture and human resource management practices the model of culture fit", Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 501-526, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022199030004006
  16. X. P. Chen, M. B. Eberly, T. J. Chiang, J. L. Farh, B. S. Cheng, "Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance", Journal of Management, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 796-819. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410604
  17. M. J. Gelfand, M. Eres, Z. Aycan, "Cross-cultural organizational behavior", Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 58, pp. 479-514. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085559
  18. S. G. Redding, "The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyer & Co", 1990.
  19. R. H. Silin, "Leadership and values: The organization of largescale Taiwanese enterprises", Harvard Univ Asia Center. 1976.
  20. S. A. Wasti, "Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Test of an integrated model in the Turkish context", International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 26, pp. 525-550. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(02)00032-9
  21. D. van Knippenberg, E. Sleebos, "Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes", Journal of Organization Behavior, Vol. 27, No.5, pp. 571-584, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.359
  22. G. Cheney, P. K. Tompkins, "Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment", Central States Speech Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 1-15, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978709368225
  23. M. Y. Cheng, L. Wang, "The mediating effect of ethical climate on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and team identification: A team-level analysis in the Chinese context", Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 129, No. 3, pp. 639-654, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2189-5
  24. SC. H. Chan, X. Huang, Ed. Snape, C. K. Lam, "The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinate's organization-based self-esteem, and performance." Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 108-128, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1797
  25. J. L. Farh, B. S. Cheng, L. F. Chou, X. P. Chu, "Authority and benevolence: Employee's responses to paternalistic leadership in China", In China's domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance, Eds. A. S. Tsui, Y. Bian, L. Cheng, New York: Sharpe, pp. 230-260. 2006.
  26. G. S. Erben, A. B. Guneser, "The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics", Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 955-968. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9605-z
  27. B. S. Cheng, C. K. Jen, "The contingent model of paternalistic leadership: Subordinate dependence and leader competence", Annual Meeting of Academy of Management, 2005.
  28. M. Rehman, B. Afsar, "The impact of paternalistic leadership on organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior", Journal of Business Management and Applied Economics. Issue 5. 2012.
  29. J. E. Dutton, J. M. Dukerich, C. V. Harquail, "Organizational images and member identification", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39, pp. 239-263, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
  30. H. Tajfel, J. Turner, "An integrative theory of intergroup conflict", The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp. 33-47. 1979.
  31. B. E. Ashforth, F. Meal, "Social identify theory and the organization", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 20-39, 1989. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
  32. M. S. Shim, M,. S. Lee, N. R. Oh, K. H. Kang, "A study on duty awareness of public health-center workers", Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.83-91, 2010.
  33. W. H. Kim, "Cross-validity model of organizational identification: Leading variables, organizational citizenship behavior, organizational commitment, and job involvement." Korean Academy of Organization and Management. Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 11-31, 2003.
  34. F. Mael, B. E. Ashforth, "Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification." Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.13, pp. 103-123. 1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
  35. M. J. Kim, G. Y. Kang, "The convergence study on the relationship between the job stress and mental health of nurses", Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp.39-47, 2015. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.5.039