한국습지학회지 (Journal of Wetlands Research)

  • 제19권1호
  • /
  • Pages.16-29
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-6031(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0056(eISSN)
한국습지학회 (Korean Wetlands Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지표수문해석모형을 이용한 남북한 수문순환 비교 평가

Comparative Evaluation of Hydrological Cycle in South and North Korea using a Land Surface Model

  • 송성욱 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 이진욱 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 조은샘 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 유철상 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과)
  • Song, Sung-uk (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jinwook (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Cho, Eunsaem (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Yoo, Chulsang (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2017.01.09
  • 심사 : 2017.02.02
  • 발행 : 2017.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

북한에서는 1990년대 이후 경제실패로 인해 대규모의 산림파괴가 이루어 진 것으로 알려져 있으며, 이는 결과적으로 수문순환의 특성을 크게 변화시켰을 것으로 예측되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이를 확인하기 위해 지표수문해석모형인 VIC 모형을 이용하여 한반도 전역을 대상으로 1981년부터 2013년까지 약 30여년의 기간에 대해 수문순환모의를 수행하였다. 모의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 먼저, 유출률의 경우, 남한에서는 55%~70%, 북한에서는 38%~56% 정도인 것으로 나타났다. 특히 유출률 자체가 작음에도 불구하고 그 변동폭은 남한의 15% 보다 큰 28% 정도임에 주목할 필요가 있다. 증발산률은 북한이 남한보다 크게 나타났다. 즉, 남한에서는 증발산률이 20~35%, 북한에서는 25%~46%로 나타났다. 그러나 그 변동폭은 북한의 경우가 21%로 남한의 15%에 비해 다소 크게 나타났다. 셋째, 토양수분량의 경우 남한의 평균이 34%, 북한의 평균은 27%로 남한이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 유출률과 증발산률의 모의 결과와는 달리 토양수분은 전 기간에 걸쳐 남한과 북한이 변동성 차이가 8% 내외로 유사한 것으로 나타났다. 이상과 같은 결과를 통해 특히 북한의 산림파괴가 본격적으로 이루어진 1990년대 이후 남한과 북한의 수문순환 특성의 차이가 확대되었음을 확인할 수 있었다. 남한의 경우에는 유역별 수문순환 특성의 차이가 미미한데 비해, 북한의 경우에는 확연히 다른 차이를 보여주고 있는데, 이 역시 산림파괴의 영향 차이가 반영된 결과로 추측된다.

It is known that large-scale deforestation has occurred in North Korea due to economic failures since the 1990s, and this is expected to greatly change the characteristics of the hydrological cycle. In this study, hydrological cycle simulation was carried out for the period of about 30 years from 1981 to 2013 for the entire Korean peninsula using the VIC model, a land surface hydrology model. The simulation results are summarized as follow. First, the runoff ratio is 55%~70% in South Korea and 38~56% in North Korea. In particular, it is worth noting that despite the small runoff ratio, the variation is about 28% larger than the South Korea's 15%. The rate of evapotranspiration was larger than that of South Korea. That is, the rate of evapotranspiration in South Korea is 20~35% and in North Korea it is 25~46%. However, the rate of change was 21% in the case of North Korea and slightly larger than 15% in South Korea. Third, South Korea has an average of 34% in soil moisture and 27% in North Korea. However, unlike the simulated results of the runoff ratio and the evapotranspiration rate, the difference in the variation of soil moisture in South Korea and North Korea over the entire period was similar with 8%. As a result, we can confirm that the difference of hydrological cycle characteristics between South Korea and North Korea has been increased since the 1990s, when the forest destruction of North Korea became serious. In the case of South Korea, there is little difference in the hydrological cycle characteristics. In North Korea, however, there is a distinct difference, which is also a result reflecting the difference in the effects of forest destruction.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, JH and Yoon, YN(2010). North Korea's Water Resources Status and Water Supply and Demand Forecast (1) - Hydrological Characteristics and Water Usage in North Korea's River Basin. J. of Korea Water Resources Association Special Issue: Water and Future, 43(4), pp. 17-26.
  2. Ahn, JH and Yoon, YN(2010). North Korea's Water Resources Status and Water Supply and Demand Forecast (2) - Prospects for Supply and Distribution of Water in North Korea. J. of Korea Water Resources Association Special Issue: Water and Future, 43(5), pp. 56-64.
  3. Ahn, JS, Jung, KS, and Lee, GM(2011). Problems of Water Use and Estimation of Water Right in North Han River Shared by North and South Korea (I) -Analysis of Diversion Impacts on Downstream Area by Imnam Dam. J. of Korea Water Resources Association, 44(4), pp. 305-314. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2011.44.4.305
  4. Al‐Shrafany, D, Rico‐R, Han, D, and Bray, M(2014). Comparative assessment of soil moisture estimation from land surface model and satellite remote sensing based on catchment water balance. Meteorological Applications, 21(3), pp. 521-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1357
  5. Blondin, C(1991). Parameterization of land-surface processes in numerical weather prediction. In Land Surface Evaporation, Springer New York. pp. 31-54.
  6. Bonan, GB(1998). The Land Surface Climatology of the NCAR Land Surface Model Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. J. of Climate, 11(6), pp. 1307-1326. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1307:TLSCOT>2.0.CO;2
  7. Brooks, RH, and Corey, AT(1964). Hydraulic properties of porous media and their relation to drainage design. Transactions of the ASAE, 7(1), pp. 26-28. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.40684
  8. Ducoudre, NI, Laval, K, and Perrier, A(1993). SECHIBA, a new set of parameterizations of the hydrologic exchanges at the land-atmosphere interface within the LMD atmospheric general circulation model. J. of Climate, 6(2), pp. 248-273. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<0248:SANSOP>2.0.CO;2
  9. Fan, Y, and van den Dool, H(2004). Climate Prediction Center global monthly soil moisture data set at 0.5 resolution for 1948 to present. J. of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D10).
  10. Franchini, M, and Pacciani, M(1991). Comparative analysis of several conceptual rainfall-runoff models. J. of Hydrology, 122(1-4), pp. 161-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(91)90178-K
  11. Kwak, CJ, Choi, WJ, and Cho, JW(2015). An Assessment of Flooding Risk Using Flash Flood Index in North Korea; Focus on Imjin Basin. J. of Korea Water Resources Association, 48(12), pp. 1037-1049. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2015.48.12.1037
  12. K-Water(1995). Imjin River Watershed Investigation Report. K-Water
  13. K-Water(2005). Investigation Report on Water Supply Status in North Korea. K-Water
  14. Lee, GM(2012). Water Resources in North Korea and Suggestions for Mutual Cooperation. J. of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 60(3), pp. 17-24.
  15. Lee, KS, Jung, MR, and Yoon, JS(1999). Content and Characteristics of Forest Cover Changes in North Korea. J. of Korean Forestry Society, 99(3), pp. 352-363.
  16. Lee, SH(2004). Situation of Degraded Forest Land in DPRK and Strategies for Forestry Cooperation between South and North Korea. J. of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 38(3), pp. 101-113.
  17. Lee, YJ(2007). North and South Korea Climate Change Cooperation Policy. Gyeonggi Research Institute, 9(4), pp. 73-93.
  18. Lee, YW and Lee, JW(1998). Water and Environment Management Initiative in North Korea. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 195, pp. 15-23.
  19. Li, H, Wigmosta, MS, Wu, H, Huang, M, Ke, Y, Coleman, AM and Leung, LR(2013). A physically based runoff routing model for land surface and earth system models. J. of Hydrometeorology, 14(3), pp. 808-828. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-015.1
  20. Liang, X, Lettenmaier, Dennis P, Wood, Eric F, and Burges, SJ(1994). A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J. of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 99(D7), pp. 14415-14428. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD00483
  21. Michell, AR(1998). The Current North Korean Economy. Economic Integration of the Korean Peninsula. Washington: Institute for International Economics.
  22. Myeong, SJ, Hong, HJ, Choi, HI, and Jung, JC(2008). Estimation of North Korea's vulnerability to natural disasters and research on inter-Korean cooperation. Korea Environment Institute, pp. 1-203.
  23. Oki, T, and Kanae, S(2006). Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources. Science, 313(5790), pp. 1068-1072. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128845
  24. Park, KS, Lee, SY, and Park, SY(2009). A Study on the North Korea's Change of Forest Policy since the Economic Crisis in 1990's. The Korean J. of Unification Affairs, 21(1), pp. 459-492.
  25. Qian, T, Dai, A, Trenberth, KE, and Oleson, KW(2006). Simulation of Global Land Surface Conditions from 1948 to 2004. Part I: Forcing Data and Evaluations. J. of Hydrometeorology, 7(5), pp. 953-975. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM540.1
  26. Sheffield, J and Wood, EF(2008). Global Trends and Variability in Soil Moisture and Drought Characteristics, 1950-2000, from Observation-Driven Simulations of the Terrestrial Hydrologic Cycle. J. of Climate, 21(3), pp. 432-458. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1822.1
  27. Shukla, S., and Wood, A. W. (2008). Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought. Geophysical research letters, 35(2).
  28. Son, KH, Lee, MH, and Bae, DH(2012). Runoff Analysis and Assessment Using Land Surface Model on East Asia. J. of Korea Water Resources Association, 45(2), pp. 165-178. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2012.45.2.165
  29. UN(2016), DPR Korea Needs and Priorities, United Nations and Partners.
  30. UN(2016), WMO Provisional Statement on the Status of the Global Climate in 2016.
  31. Wang, GQ, Zhang, JY, Jin, JL, Pagano, TC, Calow, R, Bao, ZX, and Yan, XL(2012). Assessing water resources in China using PRECIS projections and a VIC model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(1), pp. 231-240. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-231-2012
  32. Xie, Z., Yuan, F., Duan, Q., Zheng, J., Liang, M., and Chen, F. (2007). Regional parameter estimation of the VIC land surface model: Methodology and application to river basins in China. J. of Hydrometeorology, 8(3), pp. 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM568.1
  33. Yoo, CS, Kim, KW, Park, CY and Bae, DH(2015). Quantification of Tree Root Depth for Basin-Scale Sediment Yield Simulation. J. of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 15, pp. 301-311.