Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Proposal of a Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA)

  • Bergami, A.V. (Department of Architecture, University of Roma Tre) ;
  • Forte, A. (Department of Architecture, University of Roma Tre) ;
  • Lavorato, D. (Department of Architecture, University of Roma Tre) ;
  • Nuti, C. (Department of Architecture, University of Roma Tre)
  • Received : 2016.09.01
  • Accepted : 2018.01.11
  • Published : 2017.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Existing reinforced concrete frame buildings designed for vertical loads could only suffer severe damage during earthquakes. In recent years, many research activities were undertaken to develop a reliable and practical analysis procedure to identify the safety level of existing structures. The Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) is considered to be one of the most accurate methods to estimate the seismic demand and capacity of structures. However, the executions of many nonlinear response history analyses (NL_RHA) are required to describe the entire range of structural response. The research discussed in this paper deals with the proposal of an efficient Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA) to obtain capacity curves by replacing the nonlinear response history analysis of the IDA procedure with Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA). Firstly, In this work, the MPA is examined and extended to three-dimensional asymmetric structures and then it is incorporated into the proposed procedure (IMPA) to estimate the structure's seismic response and capacity for given seismic actions. This new procedure, which accounts for higher mode effects, does not require the execution of complex NL-RHA, but only a series of nonlinear static analysis. Finally, the extended MPA and IMPA were applied to an existing irregular framed building.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Italian Federal Emergency Agency

References

  1. Albanesi, T., Bergami, A.V. and Nuti, C. (2008), "Displacement based design of BRB for the seismic protection of R.C. frames", The International FIB Symposium 2008 - Tailor Made Concrete Structures: New Solutions for our Society, Amsterdam, May.
  2. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004), "Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(5), 643-661. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350504
  3. Applied Technology Council (2005), "Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures FEMA 440", Report No. ATC-55 Redwood City, CA, Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  4. Bayati, Z. and Soltani, M. (2016), "Ground motion selection and scaling for seismic design of RC frames against collapse", Earthq. Struct., 11(6), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.445
  5. Bento, R., Bhatt, C. and Pinho, R. (2010). "Using nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of the 3D irregular SPEAR building", Earthq. Struct., 1(2), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.2.177
  6. Bergami, A.V. and Nuti, C. (2010), "A design procedure for the seismic protection of infilled frames by dissipative braces", IABSE Symposium 2010, Large Structures and Infrastructures for Environmentally Constrained and Urbanised Areas, Venice.
  7. Bergami, A.V. and Nuti, C. (2011), "Seismic retrofit of rc structures with dissipative braces, design and sustainability", Fib Symposium: Concrete Engineering for Excellence and Efficiency, Prague.
  8. Bergami, A.V. and Nuti, C. (2013), "A design procedure of dissipative braces for seismic upgrading structures", Earthq. Struct., 4(1), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.1.085
  9. Bergami, A.V. and Nuti, C. (2013), "Design of dissipative braces for an existing strategic building with a pushover based procedure", COMPDYN 2013-4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Kos Island, Greece, June.
  10. Bergami, A.V. and Nuti, C. (2014), "Design of dissipative braces for an existing strategic building with a pushover based procedure", J. Civil Eng. Arch., 8(7), USA.
  11. Bergami, A.V. and Nuti, C. (2015), "A design procedure for seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete frame and concentric braced steel buildings with dissipative bracings", COMPDYN 2015 - 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete Island, Greece, May.
  12. Bergami, A.V. and Nuti, C. (2015), "Experimental tests and global modeling of masonry infilled frames", Earthq. Struct., 9(2), 281-303. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.2.281
  13. Bergami, A.V., Forte, A., Lavorato, D. and Nuti, C. (2017), "The incremental modal pushover analysis (IMPA): proposal and application", 16WCEE, Santiago del Chile, Chile, January.
  14. Bergami, A.V., Liu, X. and Nuti, C. (2015), "Evaluation of a modal pushover based incremental analysis", ACE 2015, Vietri Sul Mare, Italy, June.
  15. Bergami, A.V., Liu, X. and Nuti, C. (2015), "Proposal and application of the Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA)", Proceedings of IABSE Conference-tructural Engineering: Providing Solutions to Global Challenges, Geneva, Switzerland, September.
  16. Bhatt, C. and Bento, R. (2010a), "Extension of the CSMFEMA440 to plan-asymmetric real building structures", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) doi: 10.1002/eqe.1087.
  17. Bhatt, C. and Bento, R. (2010b), "Assessing the seismic response of existing RC buildings using the extended N2 method", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 9(4), 1183-1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9252-8
  18. Bobadilla, H., Chopra, A.K. and Eeri, M. (2008), "Evaluation of the MPA procedure for estimating seismic demands: RC-SMRF buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 24(4), 827-845. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2945295
  19. Braga, F., Gigliotti, R., Monti, G., Morelli, F., Nuti, C., Salvatore, W. and Vanzi, I. (2015), "Post-seismic assessment of existing constructions: Evaluation of the shakemaps for identifying exclusion zones in Emilia", Earthq. Struct., 8(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.037
  20. Briseghella, B., Mazzarollo, E., Zordan, T. and Liu, T. (2013), "Friction pendulum system as a retrofit technique for existing R.C. building", Struct. Eng. Int., 23(2), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686613X13439149157759
  21. Carvalho, G., Bento, R. and Bhatt, C. (2013), "Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses of reinforced concrete buildingscomparison of different modelling approaches", Earthq. Struct., 4(5), 451-470. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.5.451
  22. Casarotti, C. and Pinho, R. (2007), "An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 5(3), 377-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9031-8
  23. Chopra, A.K. (2001), Dynamic of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River NJ 07458, US.
  24. Chopra, A.K. and Chintanapakdee, C. (2004), "Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: vertically "regular" and irregular generic frames", Earthq. Spectra, 20(1), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1647580
  25. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
  26. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2004), "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(8), 903-927. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.380
  27. Colapietro, D., Netti, A., Fiore, A., Fatiguso, F. and Marano, G.C. (2014), "On the definition of seismic recovery interventions in r.c. buildings by non-linear static and incremental dynamic analyses", Int. J. Mech., 8(1), 216-222.
  28. Fajfar, P. (2000), "A nonlinear analysis method for performancebased seismic design", Earthq. Spectra, 16(3), 573-592. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128
  29. Fajfar, P., Marusic, D. and Perus, I. (2005), "Torsion effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 9(6), 831-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460509350568
  30. Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1988 ), "N2-method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular buildings", Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Kyoto.
  31. FEMA (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  32. Fiore, A. and Monaco, P. (2010), "Earthquake-induced pounding between the main buildings of the "Quinto Orazio Flacco" school", Earthq. Struct., 1(4), 371-390. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.4.371
  33. Fiore, A., Spagnoletti, G. and Greco, R. (2016), "On the prediction of shear brittle collapse mechanisms due to the infill-frame interaction in RC buildings under pushover analysis", Eng. Struct., 121, 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.044
  34. Freeman, S.A. (1998), "The capacity spectrum method as a tool for seismic design", Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France, January.
  35. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (2004), "Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses SAC buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 20(1), 225-254. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1646390
  36. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (1999), "Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures (SAC Task 5.4.3)", Report No. 132, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  37. Han, S.W. and Chopra, A.K. (2006), "Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(15), 1853-1873. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.605
  38. Huang, Y., Briseghella, B., Zordan, T., Wu, Q. and Chen, B. (2014), "Shaking table tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of an innovative lightweight bridge with CFST composite truss girder and lattice pier", Eng. Struct., 75, 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.039
  39. Iervolino, I., Galasso, C. and Cosenza. E. (2010), "Rexel: aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 8(2), 339-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1
  40. Inel, M. and Meral, E. (2016), "Seismic performance of RC buildings subjected to past earthquakes in Turkey", Earthq. Struct., 11(3), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.483
  41. Kalkan, E. and Chopra, A.K. (2012), "Evaluation of modal pushover-based scaling of one component of ground motion: tall buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 28(4), 1469-1493. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000091
  42. Kiliar, V. and Fajfar, P. (2002), "Simplified nonlinear seismic analysis of Asymmetric multistory buildings", Proceedings of the European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London.
  43. Kim, J. and Choi, H. (2004), "Behavior and design of structures with buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 26, 693-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.010
  44. Lin, J.L., Tsai, K.C. and Chuang, M.C. (2012), "Understanding the trends in torsional effects in asymmetric-plan buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 10(3), 955-965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9339-x
  45. Liu, T., Zordan, T., Briseghella, B. and Zhang, Q. (2014), "Evaluation of equivalent linear analysis methods for seismically isolated buildings characterized by SDOF systems", Eng. Struct., 59, 619-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.028
  46. Mahdi, T. and Gharaie, V.S. (2011), "Plan irregular RC frames Comparison of pushover with nonlinear dynamic analysis", Asian J. Civil Eng. (Build. Hous.), 12(6), 679-690.
  47. Marano, G.C., Greco, R., Quaranta, G., Fiore, A., Avakian, J. and Cascella, D. (2013), "Parametric identification of nonlinear devices for seismic protection using soft computing techniques", Adv. Mater. Res., 639-640, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.639-640.118
  48. Marano, G.C., Trentadue, F. and Greco, R. (2007), "Stochastic optimum design criterion of added viscous dampers for buildings seismic protection", Struct. Eng. Mech., 25(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.25.1.021
  49. Moghadam, A.S. and Tso, W.K. (1996), "Damage assessment of eccentric multistory buildings using 3-D pushover analysis", Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, June.
  50. Moghadam, A.S. and Tso, W.K. (2000). "3-D push-over analysis for damage assessment of buildings", JSEE, 2(3), 23-31.
  51. Nuti, C., Rasulo, A. and Vanzi, I. (2009), "Seismic assessment of utility systems: Application to water, electric power and transportation networks Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications", Proceedings of the Joint ESREL and SRA-Europe Conference, 3, 2519-2529.
  52. Nuti, C., Rasulo, A. and Vanzi, I. (2010), "Seismic safety of network structures and infrastructures", Struct. Infrastr. Eng., 6(1-2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802663813
  53. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  54. Priestley, M.J.N., Grant, D.N. and Blandon, C.A. (2005), "Direct displacement-based seismic design", NZSEE Conference, Pavia, Italy.
  55. Resta, M., Fiore, A. and Monaco, P. (2013), "Non-linear finite element analysis of masonry towers by adopting the damage plasticity constitutive model", Adv. Struct. Eng., 16(5), 791-803. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.5.791
  56. Reyes, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (2011), "Three-dimensional modalpushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of round motion, including its evaluation for tall building", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40, 789-806. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1060
  57. Reyes, J.C., Riano, A.C., Kalkan, E. and Arango, C.M. (2015), "Extending modal pushover-based scaling procedure for nonlinear response history analysis of multi-story unsymmetricplan buildings", Eng. Struct., 88, 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.041
  58. SAP2000v15.0 (2011), Linear and Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Three-Dimensional Structures, Berkeley, California, USA.
  59. Vamvatisikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2005), "Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multi-degree of freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE., 131(4), 589-599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:4(589)
  60. Vamvatsikos, D. (2002), "Seismic performance, capacity and reliability of structures as seen through incremental dynamic analysis", Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.
  61. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  62. Vanzi, I., Marano, G.C., Monti, G. and Nuti, C. (2015), "A synthetic formulation for the Italian seismic hazard and code implications for the seismic risk", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 77, 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.05.001

Cited by

  1. Seismic design and retrofit of frame structures with hysteretic dampers: a simplified displacement-based procedure pp.1573-1456, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00558-8
  2. An energy-based approach to determine the yield force coefficient of RC frame structures vol.21, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.1.037