DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth and Yield Responses of Corn (Zea mays L.) as Affected by Growth Period and Irrigation Intensity

  • Nam, Hyo-Hoon (Crop Production & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Seo, Myung-Chul (Crop Production & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Suk (Crop Production & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Yun-Ho (Crop Production & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Seo, Young-Jin (Bonghwa Herbal Crop Research Institute, Gyeongsangbuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
  • Received : 2017.10.16
  • Accepted : 2017.12.14
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

The frequency and intensity of soil moisture stress associated with climate change has increasing, and the stability of field crop cultivation has decreasing. This experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of soil moisture management method on growth and yield of corn. Soil moisture was managed at the grade of WSM (wet soil moisture, 34.0~42.9%), OSM (optimum soil moisture, 27.8~34.0%), DSM (dry soil moisture, 20.3~27.8%), and ESM (extreme dry moisture, 16.6~20.3%) during V8 (8th leaf stage)-VT (tasseling stage). After VT, irrigation was limited. The treated amount of irrigation was 54.1, 47.7, 44.0 and 34.5% of total water requirement, respectively. The potential evapotranspiration during the growing period was $3.29mm\;day^{-1}$, and upward movement of soil water was estimated by the AFKAE 0.5 model in the order of ESM, DSM, OSM, and WSM. We could confirm this phenomenon from actual observations. There was no significant difference in leaf characteristics, dry matter, and primary productivity depending on the level of soil moisture, but leaf development was delayed and dry weight decreased in DSM. However, dry weight and individual productivity of DSM increased after irrigation withdrawal compared to that of OSM. In DSM, ear yield and number of kernels per ear decreased, but water use efficiency and harvest index were higher than other treatments. Therefore, it is considered that the soil moisture is concentratedly managed before the V8 period, the V8-VT period is controlled within the range of 100 to 500 kPa (20.3~27.8%), and no additional irrigation is required after the VT.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrescht, D.G. and P.S. Carberry. 1993. The influence of water deficit prior to tassel initiation on maize growth, development and yield. Field Crop Res. 31:55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90050-W
  2. Aparicio-Tejo, P.M. and J.S. Boyer. 1983. Significance of accelerated leaf senescence at low water potentials for water loss and grain yield in maize. Crop. Sci. 23:1198-1202. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300060040x
  3. Aslam, M., M.S.I. Zamir, I. Afzal, M. Yaseen, M. Mubeen, and A. Shaoib. 2013. Drought stress, its effect on maize development of drought tolerance through potassium application. Cercetari Agronomic in Moldova. Vol. XLVI, No.2(154):99-114.
  4. Classen, M.M. and R.H. Shaw. 1970. Waster deficit effects on corn. II. Grain components. Agron. J. 62:652-655. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200050032x
  5. Eom, K.C., S.H. Park, and S.Y. Yoo. 2013. Water requirement of maize according to growth stage. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 46:16-22. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2013.46.1.016
  6. Gao, Z., X.G. Liang, S. Lin, X. Zhao, L. Zhang, L.L. Zhou, S. Shen, and S.L. Zhou. 2017. Supplemental irrigation at tasseling optimizes water and nitrogen distribution for high-yield production in spring maize. Field Crop Res. 209:120-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.04.015
  7. He, H., Y.L. Du, T. Wang, N.C. Turner, R.P. Yang, Y. Jin, Y. Xi, C. Zhang, T. Cui, X.W. Fang, and F.M. Li. 2017. Conserved water use improves the yield performance of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under drought. Agric. Water Manage. 179:236-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.008
  8. Heiniger, R.W. 2000. Irrigation and drought management. Crop Science Department.
  9. IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, p.151.
  10. Jung, T.W., H.G. Moon, B.Y. Son, S.J. Kim, S.W. Cha, H.K. Min, H.J. Choi, and I.M. Ryu. 2006. A new waxy corn hybrid cultivar, 'Ilmichal' with good eating quality and lodging resistance. Korean J. Breed. 38:135-136.
  11. Kim, K.H., J.C. Moon, J.Y. Kim, H.C. Kim, S.H. Shin, K.T. Song, and B.M. Lee. 2015. Research status for drought tolerance in maze. Korean J. Crop Sci. 60:401-411. https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2015.60.4.401
  12. Kim, T.W., B.M. Lee, and S.H. Shin. 2016. Development of drought stress interpretation and mitigation for stable maize production. RDA report. RDA, Wanju, Republic of Korea.
  13. Lorens, G.F., J.M. Benett, and L.B. Loggale. 1987. Differences in drought resistance between two corn hybrids. I. Water relations and root length density. Agron. J. 79:802-807. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900050009x
  14. NeSmith, D.S. and J.T. Ritchie. 1992. Effects of soil water-deficits during tassel emergence on development and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Res. 28:251-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(92)90044-A
  15. Seo, M.C. 2014. Development of assessment technology for prediction of damages on upland crops according to climate change scenario RCP8.5. RDA Res. Rep. RDA, Wanju, Republic of Korea.
  16. Seo, M.C., S.O. Hur, Y.K. Sonn, H.S. Cho, W.T. Jeon, M.K. Kim, and M.T. Kim. 2012. The development of estimation model (AFKAE0.5) for water balance and soil water content using daily weather data. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 45:1203-1210. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.6.1203