DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Trends of Scientific Names presented in the Written Test for Engineer Landscape Architecture

조경기사 필기시험 중 조경식재분야 학명의 출제경향 분석

  • Jung, Yong-Jo (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Sangmyung University)
  • 정용조 (상명대학교 환경조경학과)
  • Received : 2017.08.14
  • Accepted : 2017.11.10
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the tendencies of the written test questions regarding the scientific plant names in the subject of scenic planting in the national qualification test for landscape engineers. To achieve this purpose, targeting the 20 questions in the subject of scenic planting, the study chronologically analyzed the types of the presented questions about the scientific names of the plants, the changes in their year-to-year number, and their presentation frequency over the past 11 years from 2006 to 2016. The following was found by an analysis of the tendency of the questions presented over 11 years from 2006 to 2016 regarding the scientific plant names in scenic planting in the written test of the national technical qualification examination for landscape engineers. The number of these questions was 234, and they were classified into 13 items: scientific names, families/genuses/ species, characteristics, barks, roots, foliage, flowers, fruits, properties, places of origin, stalks, leave, and uses. After analyzing the examination question trends per year, the year in which the highest number of questions was given was 2013 at 56.6%; the ratio of questions asking botanical names increased until 2013, although that ratio decreased starting in 2014 due to consistent efforts from the landscaping field. The plant species most frequently asked about were Betula platyphylla and Taxus cuspidata and others frequently asked about included Pinus densiflora, Acer palmatum, Forsythia koreana, Cercis chinensis, Robinia pseudoacacia, Cornus officinalis, Zelkova serrata, Abies holophylla, Camellia japonica, Sophora japonica, Chaenomeles sinensis, which were asked about more than 10 times. The number of plant species presented as question items or choice items was 240 and their presentation frequency was 806, Among these, 66 species were steadily presented more than five times. They were presented 486 times, accounting for 27.5% of all species. The number of the new plant species which began to be presented in 2009 were 119(49.58% including Quercus myrsinaefolia) of all 240 species, indicating that their presentation frequency was gradually increased. As a result of comparative analysis of questions on arbor and shrub, evergreen and leaf abscission that have been presented for recent 11 years, the questions on arbor were more than shrub, the questions on leaf abscission were more than evergreen.

본 연구는 조경식재과목 20문항 중 2006년부터 2016년까지 최근 11년 동안 시간적 추이에 따른 학명의 영역별 출제문제 유형과 연도별 출제 문항 수 변화추이 그리고 11년 동안 출제 빈도수를 파악 분석하여 조경기사 필기시험 중 식재과목의 학명시험문제 출제경향을 분석하고자 하였다. 2006년부터 2016년까지 최근 11년 동안 축적된 국가기술자격검정 조경기사 필기시험 중 조경식재 문항을 분석하여 고찰한 학명문제의 출제경향은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 최근 11년 동안 출제된 학명 문제는 234개 문항이었으며, 유형별로는 학명, 과 속 종, 특징, 수피, 뿌리, 단풍, 꽃, 열매, 성상, 원산지, 줄기, 잎, 용도 등 13개 항목을 묻는 문제가 출제되었으며, 그 중 수종의 특징을 묻는 질문이 가장 많았다. 둘째, 연도별 출제 현황을 분석해 본 결과, 출제 문항수가 가장 많이 출제된 연도는 2013년도로써 56.6%를 차지하였으며, 학명을 묻는 출제 문항수 비율이 2013년까지 증가하다가 조경분야의 지속적인 노력으로 2014년부터 점차 감소하고 있다. 셋째, 기출문제에서 나타난 출제빈도 수 분석에서 가장 출제빈도가 높은 수종은 자작나무(Betula platyphylla)와 주목(Taxus cuspidata)이었으며, 소나무(Pinus densiflora), 단풍나무(Acer palmatum), 개나리(Forsythia koreana), 박태기나무(Cercis chinensis), 아까시나무(Robinia pseudoacacia), 산수유(Cornus officinalis), 느티나무(Zelkova serrata), 전나무(Abies holophylla), 동백나무(Camellia japonica), 회화나무(Sophora japonica), 모과나무(Chaenomeles sinensis) 등이 10회 이상 출제되어 자주 출제되고 있는 수종으로 나타났다. 넷째, 문항 및 보기에 출제된 수종은 240개 수종에 806회였으며, 이 중 5회 이상 꾸준히 출제된 수종은 66개 수종에 486회로 27.5%를 차지하였다. 다섯 번째, 2009년 이전에는 출제되지 않았던 수종이 2009년부터 출제되고 있는 신규 수종은 출제된 240개 수종 중 가시나무(Quercus myrsinaefolia) 등 119개 수종으로 49.58%를 차지하였으며, 이처럼 신규 수종의 출제빈도가 점차 늘어나고 있음을 확인하였다. 여섯 번째, 최근 11년 동안 출제된 수목의 교목과 관목, 상록과 낙엽을 비교 분석해 본 결과, 교목이 관목보다 낙엽이 상록보다 많이 출제되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bang, K. J., K. O. Cho and T. Y. Lee(2001) Differences between common name and scientific name of interior landscape plants in practical circulation. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 28(6): 127-132.
  2. Choi, S. B.(1993) Etymological study of species in scientific names of landscape plants. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 21(2): 8-16.
  3. Choi, S. B.(1998) A study on pronunciation in scientific names of landscape plants. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 26(1): 44-50.
  4. Kang, H. G. and H. B. Kim(2010) Tendencies in question development on the professional landscape architect qualification examination - Centered on recognition of test-takers for sample questions from previous professional landscape architect tests-. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 38(5): 42-52.
  5. Lee, J. H. and H. C. Kang(2006) The analysis by expression contents (scientific name & common name) of interpretation signs in natural monument. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 24(2): 33-42.
  6. So, H. S. and E. J. Lim(2015) The tendency of the written test questions for the history of Korean landscape architecture in national qualification test of a landscape engineer. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 33(2): 89-102. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA2015.33.2.089
  7. http://www.q-net.or.kr