DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Orbit Determination of KOMPSAT-1 and Cryosat-2 Satellites Using Optical Wide-field Patrol Network (OWL-Net) Data with Batch Least Squares Filter

  • Received : 2016.08.25
  • Accepted : 2017.02.28
  • Published : 2017.03.15

Abstract

The optical wide-field patrol network (OWL-Net) is a Korean optical surveillance system that tracks and monitors domestic satellites. In this study, a batch least squares algorithm was developed for optical measurements and verified by Monte Carlo simulation and covariance analysis. Potential error sources of OWL-Net, such as noise, bias, and clock errors, were analyzed. There is a linear relation between the estimation accuracy and the noise level, and the accuracy significantly depends on the declination bias. In addition, the time-tagging error significantly degrades the observation accuracy, while the time-synchronization offset corresponds to the orbital motion. The Cartesian state vector and measurement bias were determined using the OWL-Net tracking data of the KOMPSAT-1 and Cryosat-2 satellites. The comparison with known orbital information based on two-line elements (TLE) and the consolidated prediction format (CPF) shows that the orbit determination accuracy is similar to that of TLE. Furthermore, the precision and accuracy of OWL-Net observation data were determined to be tens of arcsec and sub-degree level, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Crassidis JL, Junkins JL, Optimal estimation of dynamic systems, second edition (CRC press, New York, 2011).
  2. Henize KG, Stanley JF, O'Neill CA, Nowakowski BS, Detection of orbital debris with GEODSS telescopes, In Proc. SPIE 1951, 76-84 (1993). https://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.156562
  3. Hughes SP, Qureshi RH, Cooley DS, Parker JJ, Grubb TG, Verification and validation of the general mission analysis tool (GMAT), in 2014 AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, San Diego, CA, 4-7 Aug 2014.
  4. Jo JH, Choi J, Park M, Son JY, Bae Y, et al., Early CAL/VAL process for an optical tracking system by Korea, Proceedings of the 16th AMOS Conference, Maui, Hawaii, 15-18 Sep 2015.
  5. Kim HO, Kim HS, Lim HS, Choi HJ, Space-based earth observation activities in south Korea [Space Agencies], IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 3, 34-39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2014.2382652
  6. Kurtz NT, Galin N, Studinger M, An improved CryoSat-2 sea ice freeboard retrieval algorithm through the use of waveform fitting, Cryosphere 8, 1217-1237 (2014). https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tcd-8-721-2014
  7. Long AC, Cappellari Jr. JO, Velez CE, Fuchs AJ, Goddard trajectory determination system (GTDS) mathematical theory (revision 1), National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Goddard Space Flight Center, FDD/552-89/001, CSC/TR-89/6001 (1989).
  8. Molotov I, Agapov V, Titenko V, Khutorovsky Z, Burtsev Y, et al., International scientific optical network for space debris research, Adv. Space Res. 41, 1022-1028 (2008). https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.04.048
  9. NERC Space Geodesy Facility, Satellite CPF Prediction Residuals [Internet], cited 2017 Feb 15, available from: http://sgf.rgo.ac.uk
  10. Park J, Choi Y, Jo J, Moon H, Im H, et al., A Korean space situational awareness program: OWL Network, Proceedings of the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, Maui, Hawaii, 11-14 Sep 2012.
  11. Park M, Jo JH, Cho S, Choi J, Kim CH, et al., Minimum number of observation points for LEO satellite orbit estimation by OWL Network, J. Astron. Space Sci. 32, 357-366 (2015). https://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.4.357
  12. Park SY, Keum KH, Lee SW, Jin H, Park YS, et al., Development of a data reduction algorithm for optical wide field patrol, J. Astron. Space Sci. 30, 193-206 (2013). https://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2013.30.3.193
  13. Pearlman MR, Degnan JJ, Bosworth JM, The international laser ranging service, Adv. Space Res. 30, 135-143 (2002). https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00277-6
  14. Sabol C, Alfriend KT, Wiese D, Angles-only orbit updates for low-earth-orbit satellites, J. guid. Control. Dyn. 30, 314-321 (2007). https://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.25008
  15. Schutz B, Tapley B, Born GH, Statistical orbit determination, first edition (Academic Press, San Diego, 2004).
  16. Son JY, Jo JH, Choi J, Kim BY, Yoon JN, et al., Optical orbit determination of a Geosynchronous Earth Orbit satellite effected by baseline distances between various groundbased tracking stations II: COMS case with analysis of actual observation data, J. Astron. Space Sci. 32, 229-235 (2015). https://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.3.229
  17. Stokes GH, Evans JB, Viggh HE, Shelly FC, Pearce EC, Lincoln near-Earth asteroid program (LINEAR), Icarus 148, 21-28 (2000). https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/icar.2000.6493
  18. Tombasco J, Orbit estimation of geosynchronous objects via ground-based and space-based optical tracking, PhD Dissertation, University of Colorado (2011).
  19. Vallado DA, Agapov V, Orbit determination results from optical measurements, in AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Toronto, Ontario, 2-5 Aug 2010.