DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Survey on practice behavior and model acceptance of traditional Korean medicine(TKM) doctors in order to develop health insurance payment model related with TKM clinical practice guidelines(CPGs).

한의임상진료지침 연계 건강보험 지불모형 개발을 위한 한의사 진료행태 및 모형 수용도 조사

  • Kim, Dongsu (Policy & Standards Planning Team, KM Standards Centers, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Byungmook (Division of Humanities and Social Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Han, Dongwoon (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Ji-eun (Policy & Standards Planning Team, KM Standards Centers, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Hyoung-Sun (Department of Health Administration, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University)
  • 김동수 (한국한의학연구원 정책표준기획팀) ;
  • 임병묵 (한국한의학연구원 정책표준기획팀) ;
  • 한동운 (한양대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 박지은 (한국한의학연구원 정책표준기획팀) ;
  • 정형선 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 보건행정학과)
  • Received : 2017.10.18
  • Accepted : 2017.11.25
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study is to investigate the practice patterns of traditional Korean medicine (TKM) doctors and the acceptance of payment model in order to develop a new TKM health insurance payment model linked with TKM clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Methods : Lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD) and idiopathic facial palsy (IFP) were selected as a test diseases to develop a new TKM payment model. The level of benefit coverage in the National Health Insurance (NHI) was designed. The survey asked 228 TKM doctors about their practice patterns in HIVD and IFP patients and acceptance of new payment model. Results : Mean of medical cost for treatment of HIVD was 441,000 KW, mean of treatment period ranged from 4.9 to 17.5 weeks, and mean of number of treatment ranged from 14.6 to 50.4 HIVD patients. In the case of IFP, mean of medical cost for treatment of IFP was 468,000 KW, mean of treatment period was at least 4.2 and up to 15.9 weeks and mean of number of treatment ranged from 14.2 to 52 IFP patients. Conclusions : Current study suggests that mixed payment model of per-visit and episode-based model seem to be proper. The model 1 bundles both items which were covered and not covered by NHI in a rational way. The model 2 is based on the development and application of critical pathway. Lastly, model 3 suggests bundling of items covered by current NHI. Acceptance of TKM doctors is expected to be highest in the model 3.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Health & Welfare. 2014-2018 Midterm plan about benefit extenstion of health insurance. 2015.
  2. National Planning and Advisory Committee. 5 years plan of Moon's government administration. 2017.
  3. Kim D & Lim B. The trend of Korean Medicine utilization in 2008-2013. Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine 2017;21(1):57-66 https://doi.org/10.25153/spkom.2017.21.1.007
  4. The Association of Korean Medicine. Fee & payment standard of Korean medicine at health insurance. 2016.
  5. Ministry of Health & Welfare.. 3rd Comprehensive development plan of Korean medicine 2016-2020. 2016.
  6. Kim CY. A theory about health security. Han-ul academy. 2009.
  7. David MC, Kaushik G. The Potential for Cost Savings through Bundled Episode Payments. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1075-1077 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1113361
  8. Kim J, Kim EH, Kim YH. Designing a Global Budget Payment System for Oriental Medical Services in the National Health Insurance. Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine 2010;14(1):77-96
  9. Pusan National University School of Korean Medicine. Rationalization plan of Korean medicine health insurance payment system. 2012.
  10. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Inpatient Classification System in Korean Medicine(KOPG-KM) Version 2.1. 2016.
  11. Song KM, Kim YO, Kim YS. A Study on Improvement of the Korean National Health Insurance(NHI) Reimbursement System to Prepare the Aged Society. The Journal of Korena Association Occupational Therapy Policy for Aged Industry 2013;5(1):27-37
  12. Pusan National University School of Korean Medicine. Study on pilot project about health insurance benefit of chuna therapy. Korean Society Chuna manual medicine for Spine & Nerve. 2015.
  13. The Association of Korean Medicine. Fee & payment standard of Korean medicine at health insurance. 2016.
  14. Huang DS, Shin HK. A Survey of the Status of Management and Prices of Herbal Medicines : Traditional Korean Medicine Institutions. The Journal of Korean Medicine 2011;32(5):90-99
  15. Kim D, Kwon SH, Chung SH, Ahn BR, Lim B. The Health Insurance system and the Quality Improvement Policies for Chinese Medicine in Taiwan. Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine 2016;20(2):27-38
  16. 中醫門診醫療服務審査執行會 台北區分會. 中醫醫療院所針灸標準作業程序醫療品質提升計畫實施方案. 2012.
  17. Shin YS, Kim YI. Health Policy and Management. Seoul National University Press. 2013.
  18. Sood N, Huckfeldt PJ, Escarce JJ, Grabowski DC, Newhouse JP. Medicare's bundled payment pilot for acute postacute care: analysis and recommendations on where to begin. Health Affairs 2011;30(9):1708-1717 https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0394

Cited by

  1. Using Genome Sequence to Enable the Design of Medicines and Chemical Probes vol.118, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00504
  2. 독일에서의 침술 건강보험 급여화 사례 연구 vol.23, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.25153/spkom.2019.23.3.009
  3. The Provision and Utilization of Traditional Korean Medicine in South Korea: Implications on Integration of Traditional Medicine in a Developed Country vol.9, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101379