DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implant-retained overdenture with CM LOC® Pekkton® in maxillary edentulous patient

상악 완전 무치악 환자에서 CM LOC® Pekkton® attachment를 이용한 임플란트 유지 피개의치 수복 증례

  • Hong, Mun Gi (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Soo-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 홍문기 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 신수연 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2017.07.24
  • Accepted : 2017.11.17
  • Published : 2017.12.30

Abstract

Treatment options for edentulous patients are complete denture and implant prosthesis. A two implant-retained overdenture can be considered the first treatment in the edentulous mandible, but there is no clear consensus of treatment for edentulous maxilla. Implant-retention/support overdenture shows better retention and stability than complete denture and is less expensive and more esthetic than implant-supported fixed prosthesis. CM $LOC^{(R)}$ $Pekkton^{(R)}$ attachment is a solitary type attachment and evaluated to have excellent abrasion resistance and retention with a female part made of poly-ether-ketone-ketone. Meanwhile, SR Ivocap system is injection molding method and discussed to show few changes in the vertical dimension of denture and have excellent fracture resistance. In this case, we restored maxillary arch with a four implant-retained overdenture using CM $LOC^{(R)}$ $Pekkton^{(R)}$ and SR Ivocap system, and mandibular arch with a removable partial denture. Through this procedure, satisfactory outcomes were achieved both in functional and esthetic aspects.

무치악은 총의치나 임플란트 보철물로 수복이 가능하며 임플란트를 이용한 피개의치는 총의치보다 유지와 안정이 우수하고, 임플란트 고정성 보철물에 비해 저렴하고 심미적이다. CM $LOC^{(R)}$ $Pekkton^{(R)}$ 어태치먼트는 여자부가 poly-ether-ketone-ketone으로 마모저항성이 뛰어나다. 한편, SR Ivocap system은 가압주사성형법으로 의치의 수직고경 변화가 적고 강도가 우수하다. 본 증례에서 상악은 4개의 임플란트 식립 후 CM $LOC^{(R)}$ $Pekkton^{(R)}$ 어태치먼트와 SR Ivocap system을 이용한 임플란트 유지 피개의치를, 하악은 가철성 국소의치를 제작하였고 심미적 및 기능적으로 만족스러운 결과를 얻었기에 이를 보고하는 바이다.

Keywords

References

  1. DeBoer J. Edentulous implants: overdenture versus fixed. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:386-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90186-R
  2. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT Jr, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:413-4.
  3. Ekfeldt A, Johansson LA, Isaksson S. Implant-supported overdenture therapy: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:366-74.
  4. Parel SM, Phillips WR. A risk assessment treatment planning protocol for the four implant immediately loaded maxilla: preliminary findings. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:359-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60147-9
  5. Chan MF, Narhi TO, de Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implantsupported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:7-15.
  6. Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202419.21665.36
  7. Passia N, Ghazal M, Kern M. Long-term retention behaviour of resin matrix attachment systems for overdentures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;57:88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.038
  8. El Bahra S, Ludwig K, Samran A, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Linear and volumetric dimensional changes of injection-molded PMMA denture base resins. Dent Mater 2013;29:1091-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.020
  9. Strohaver RA. Comparison of changes in vertical dimension between compression and injection molded complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:716-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90599-4
  10. Gharechahi J, Asadzadeh N, Shahabian F, Gharechahi M. Dimensional changes of acrylic resin denture bases: conventional versus injectionmolding technique. J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11:398-405.
  11. Uzun G, Hersek N. Comparison of the fracture resistance of six denture base acrylic resins. J Biomater Appl 2002;17:19-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328202017001597
  12. Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:108-25. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1108.x
  13. Zou D, Wu Y, Huang W, Wang F, Wang S, Zhang Z, Zhang Z. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:566-73. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3485
  14. Narhi TO, Hevinga M, Voorsmit RA, Kalk W. Maxillary overdentures retained by splinted and unsplinted implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:259-66.
  15. Nissan J, Oz-Ari B, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long-term prosthetic aftercare of direct vs. indirect attachment incorporation techniques to mandibular implant-supported overdenture. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:627-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02026.x
  16. Whang SW, Chung MK. Comparative tensile bond strength of heat-cured, cold-cured, and light cured denture base resins bonded to continuous-pressure injection type denture base resin. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1993;31:385-93.