대한건축학회논문집:계획계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design)

대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

물리적 환경의 고령친화 디자인 가이드라인 개발

Development of Aged-friendly Design Guideline in Physical Environment

  • 투고 : 2017.05.24
  • 심사 : 2017.12.02
  • 발행 : 2017.12.26
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this research is to provide a basic framework of design guideline for elderly people who can live without inconvenience. It is time to think about how to create an age-friendly city for the Korean society which is rapidly advancing in population aging. Design guidelines studied in this research cover not only architecture but also urban, landscape and transportation fields, and consist of 90 items in 7 areas (park&open space, buildings, pedestrian street, crosswalk&bicycle lane, bus stop&subway station, parking housing). The importance of each item and each area were surveyed to verify objectivity. The result of importance of each item can be used to select design guidelines which can be applied first to create an aged-friendly physical environment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Age-Friendly, D. C. (2014). Strategic plan 2014-2017, Age-Friednly DC Web site.
  2. American Planning Association (2014). Aging in community policy guide.
  3. Augusta Georgia (2015). 2015 Age-friendly community action plan.
  4. Australian Local Government Association (2006). Opportunities for local government, Age-friendly built environments.
  5. Barefoot Planning (2016). Distric of Ucluelet, Age-friendly action plan.
  6. British Columbia (2015). Age-friendly and disability-friendly official community plans.
  7. Bloomberg, M. R. & Quinn, C. C. (2009). Age-friendly NYC: Enhancing Our City's Livability for Older New Yorkers. New York.
  8. Chemung County (2014). Age-friendly community action plan.
  9. City of Auburn Hills (2015). Age-friendly 2015 action plan.
  10. City of Chicago (2014). Finding from a community-wide baseline assessment, Age-friendly Chicago.
  11. City of Colwood (2015). Age-friendly community plan.
  12. City of Fremantle (2010). Outcomes report-Age friendly city plan 2011-2014.
  13. City of Monash (2014). Age friendly Monash a positive ageing plan 2015-2019.
  14. City of Waterloo (2012). Report to the mayor, For age-friendly Waterloo, Mayor's advisory committee.
  15. City of Thunder Bay (2015). Age-friendly city services action plan.
  16. Council, A. F. P. A. (2013). Action plan for an age-friendly Portland.
  17. Edmonton Seniors Coordinating Council (2011). Action plan, Vision for an age-friendly Edmonton.
  18. George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 Update(4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
  19. Hamilton Council on Aging (2014). Hamilton's plan for an Age-friendly city.
  20. Jeong, K., Oh, Y., Kang, E., Kim, J., Sunwoo, D., Oh, M., Lee, Y., Hwang, N., Kim, K., Oh, S., Park, B., Sin, H. & Lee, K. (2014). Survey of the elderly in 2014, Policy Report of Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 2014-61.
  21. Jeong, K., Song, B., Sin, H. & Yoon, H. (2004). A Comperative Study on the Old's an the Young's Depth Perception for Universal Design, Journal of the Ergonomios Society of Korea 23(3), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2004.23.3.111
  22. Kim, Y. & Nam, H. (2011). A Research on Age-friendly City in Gyeonggi Province, Gyeonggi Family & Women Research Institute Policy Report 2011-11.
  23. Kingston (2014). Age-friendly Kingston stage two report action plan.
  24. Kwak, B. & Kim, K. (2015). Improvement Proposal of Guideline for Expansion or Universal Design, Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 9(4), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2015.12.9.4.61
  25. Limerick City (2015). Strategy 2015-2020, Age friendly Limerick
  26. Lee, K. & Kim, S. (2017). Development of Age-friendly City Indicators-Focused on measurable indicators of the physical environments from the elderly, Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea, 18(2), 51-62.
  27. Lee, Y., Kwon T., Kim, S., Son, C., Lee, T., Kim, J., Lee, Y. & Lee, C. (2016). Age-friendly Life and Architecture, Jinyoungsa.
  28. Maple Ridge (2016). Age-friendly community action plan.
  29. McSWEENEY (2016). Greater Madawaska Age-friendly community plan.
  30. Salhus, M. (2010). Best practices in age-friendly planning.
  31. Miami-Dade County (2014). Action plan for an age-friendly Miami-Dade, Miami-Dade age-friendly Initiative.
  32. Municipality of Huron East (2015). Age-friendly action plan.
  33. Municipality of Port Hope (2016). Age-friendly community action plan.
  34. Municipality of Wawa (2016). Age-friendly Wawa needs assessment & action plan.
  35. North Pender Island Local Trust Committee (2015). Age-friendly North Pender Island action plan.
  36. Old Moat (2013). Age-friendly neighbourhood report.
  37. Pitt Meadows (2015). Age-friendly community initiative.
  38. Queensland Government (2016). Action plan, An age-friendly community, Queensland.
  39. Richmond City Council (2015). Age-friendly assessment and action plan.
  40. Roscommon Age Friendly County (2016). Age friendly Strategy 2016-2020.
  41. Seoul Welfare Foundation (2015). The 1st action plan 2013-2015, Evaluation report on age-friendly Seoul.
  42. Seoul Welfare Foundation (2016). The 2nd action plan 2016-2020, Age-friendly Seoul.
  43. Tauranga (2013). Tauranga age-friendly city strategy 2013-2023.
  44. The Age Friendly London Network (2014). Age friendly survey, Report to the community, Age-friendly London.
  45. The City of Langford (2014). Langford age-friendly action plan.
  46. The City of New York (2011), A progress report, Age friendly NYC.
  47. The City of Tinnins (2016). Timmins age-friendly community strategy.
  48. The University of Hawaii Center on Aging (2015). An action plan, Making Honolulu an age-friendly city.
  49. Toronto (2013). Towards an age-friendly city, The toronto seniors strategy.
  50. Village of Keremeos (2015). Keremeos age-friendly action plan.
  51. Winnipeg (2014). Action plan, Age-friendly Winnipeg.
  52. World Health Organization (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. World Health Organization.