DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art

  • Lambert, Hugo (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Montpellier University) ;
  • Durand, Jean-Cedric (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Montpellier University) ;
  • Jacquot, Bruno (Preventive Department, Faculty of Odontology, Marseille University) ;
  • Fages, Michel (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Montpellier University)
  • Received : 2017.02.26
  • Accepted : 2017.04.20
  • Published : 2017.12.29

Abstract

The wide use of chairside CAD/CAM restorations has increased the diversity of the restorative material. For the practitioner, the selection of the appropriate material is difficult amongst the variety offered by the market. Information on the characteristics of the products can be difficult to assess due to the lack of up-to-date classification and the lack of reliability of manufacturer's advertising. The purpose of this article is to structure the data on restorative materials provided by various sources in order for the practitioner to choose the product most suited to the clinical situation. The objective is to classify chairside CAD/CAM materials and to define their characteristics and indications.

Keywords

References

  1. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:559-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.011
  2. Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58:208-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003
  3. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical and SEM evaluation of allceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:163-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00022.x
  4. Vichi A, Sedda M, Del Siena F, Louca C, Ferrari M. Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 1: Chairside materials. Am J Dent 2013;26:255-9.
  5. Sannino G, Germano F, Arcuri L, Bigelli E, Arcuri C, Barlattani A. CEREC CAD/CAM chairside system. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2015;7:57-70.
  6. Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012;28:529-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.003
  7. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93:1232-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553976
  8. Oh KT, Kim KN. Electrochemical properties of suprastructures galvanically coupled to a titanium implant. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;70:318-31.
  9. Tuna SH, Pekmez NO, Keyf F, Canli F. The electrochemical properties of four dental casting suprastructure alloys coupled with titanium implants. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:467-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000500022
  10. Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:4S-7S.
  11. Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:513-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2004.01.003
  12. Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011;56:84-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01299.x
  13. Giordano R 2nd. A comparison of all-ceramic restorative systems: Part 2. Gen Dent 2000;48:38-40, 43-5.
  14. Deany IL. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7:134-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411960070020201
  15. Kelly JR. Ceramics in Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry. Annu Rev Mater Sci 1997;27:443-68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.27.1.443
  16. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:227-35.
  17. Vichi A, Carrabba M, Paravina R, Ferrari M. Translucency of ceramic materials for CEREC CAD/CAM system. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:224-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12105
  18. Bindl A, Luthy H, Mormann WH. Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns. Dent Mater 2006;22:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.007
  19. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Ender A, Roos M, Edelhoff D, Wimmer T. Influence of cementation and cement type on the fracture load testing methodology of anterior crowns made of different materials. Dent Mater J 2013;32:888-95. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-147
  20. Ozcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2015;17:7-26.
  21. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Quintessence Int 1994;25:199-207.
  22. Ma L, Guess PC, Zhang Y. Load-bearing properties of minimal-invasive monolithic lithium disilicate and zirconia occlusal onlays: finite element and theoretical analyses. Dent Mater 2013;29:742-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.004
  23. Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.005
  24. Nawafleh N, Hatamleh M, Elshiyab S, Mack F. Lithium disilicate restorations fatigue testing parameters: A systematic review. J Prosthodont 2016;25:116-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12376
  25. Rinke S, Rodiger M, Ziebolz D, Schmidt AK. Fabrication of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic Restorations Using a Complete Digital Workflow. Case Rep Dent 2015;2015:162178.
  26. Denry I, Kelly JR. Emerging ceramic-based materials for dentistry. J Dent Res 2014;93:1235-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553627
  27. Subbarao EC. Zirconia - an overview Advances in Ceramics. American Ceram Soc 1981;1-24.
  28. Kisi EH, Howard CJ. Crystal structures of zirconia phases and their inter-relation. Key Eng Mater 1998;153-4:1-36.
  29. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007
  30. Filser F, Kocher P, Gauckler LJ. Net-shaping of ceramic components by direct ceramic machining. Assem Autom 2003;23:382-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150310501217
  31. Daou EE. Esthetic Prosthetic Restorations: Reliability and Effects on Antagonist Dentition. Open Dent J 2015;9:473-81. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601509010473
  32. Chevalier J, Deville S, Munch E, Jullian R, Lair F. Critical effect of cubic phase on aging in 3mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics for hip replacement prosthesis. Biomaterials 2004;25:5539-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.002
  33. Kojima Y, Matsuoka T, Takahashi H. Structure of poly (methyl methacrylate) synthesized under high pressure. J Mater Sci Lett 2002;21:473-5. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015382506716
  34. Van Noort R. An introduction to dental materials. In: Resin composites and polyacid-modified resin composites. Mosby Ltd., 2002. p. 96-123.
  35. Albers HF. Tooth-colored restoratives: Principles and techniques. In Resins, PMPH-USA, 2002. p. 111-25.
  36. Rawls H, Esquivel-Upshaw J. Restorative resins. Phillip's Sci Dent Mater 2003, p. 399-441.
  37. Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ. From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks: State of the Art of Indirect Composites. J Dent Res 2016;95:487-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516634286
  38. Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, van Putten M. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:432-8.
  39. Lovell LG, Newman SM, Bowman CN. The effects of light intensity, temperature, and comonomer composition on the polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins. J Dent Res 1999;78:1469-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780081301
  40. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater 1992;8:290-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90102-I
  41. Bausch JR, de Lange C, Davidson CL. The influence of temperature on some physical properties of dental composites. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:309-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00505.x
  42. Goldberg M. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:1-8.
  43. Goldberg M, Dimitrova-Nakov S, Schmalz G. BPA from dental resin material: where are we going with restorative and preventive dental biomaterials? Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:347-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1153-6
  44. Wiegand A, Stucki L, Hoffmann R, Attin T, Stawarczyk B. Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2007-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1411-x
  45. Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J 2013;7:118-22. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210620130904003
  46. Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater 2014;30:564-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.019
  47. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013;29:419-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002
  48. Rocca GT, Bonnafous F, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. A technique to improve the esthetic aspects of CAD/CAM composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:273-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60138-2
  49. Giordano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM-produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:14S-21S.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Cytomorphometry and Early Cell Response of Human Gingival Fibroblast (HGFs) between Zirconium and New Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramics (ZLS) vol.19, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092718
  2. 치과보철물의 재제작 실태에 관한 예비조사 vol.40, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2018.40.3.173
  3. Fracture Toughness Analysis of Ceramic and Resin Composite CAD/CAM Material vol.44, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2341/18-161-l
  4. Repeatability of Intraoral Scanners for Complete Arch Scan of Partially Edentulous Dentitions: An In Vitro Study vol.8, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081187
  5. Biocompatibility of Polymer and Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials with Human Gingival Fibroblasts (HGFs) vol.11, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091446
  6. Two‐year performance of CAD/CAM fabricated resin composite inlay restorations: A randomized controlled clinical trial vol.31, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12534
  7. Clinical workflow of two different CAD/CAM systems for veneers manufacture vol.9, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4103/ejgd.ejgd_216_19
  8. The utilization of snap‐on provisionals for dental veneers: From an analog to a digital approach vol.32, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12563
  9. Colour stability and surface properties of high‐translucency restorative materials for digital dentistry after simulated oral rinsing vol.128, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12676
  10. Influence of Milling Tool and Prosthetic Materials on Roughness of the Dental CAD CAM Prostheses in End Milling Mode vol.10, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072238
  11. Evaluation of marginal discrepancy in metal frameworks fabricated by sintering-based computer-aided manufacturing methods vol.12, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.3.124
  12. Estimation of stress distribution and risk of failure for maxillary premolar restored by occlusal veneer with different CAD/CAM materials and preparation designs vol.24, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03190-7
  13. Effect of the amount of light energy transmitted through CAD/CAM resin block on bonding performance of four types of resin cement adhesive systems vol.39, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-145
  14. Influence of Alumina Air-Abrasion on Flexural and Shear Bond Strengths of CAD/CAM Composite vol.10, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10100927
  15. Fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. Which is better? - A systematic review of in-vitro studies vol.8, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1932510
  16. Effectiveness of Nanohydroxyapatite on Demineralization of Enamel and Cementum Surrounding Margin of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Polycrystalline Ceramic Restoration vol.2021, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5540738
  17. Resin Composite Materials for Chairside CAD/CAM Restorations: A Comparison of Selected Mechanical Properties vol.2021, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8828954
  18. Impact of artificial aging by thermocycling on edge chipping resistance and Martens hardness of different dental CAD-CAM restorative materials vol.125, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.022
  19. Review on Polymer, Ceramic and Composite Materials for CAD/CAM Indirect Restorations in Dentistry—Application, Mechanical Characteristics and Comparison vol.14, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071592
  20. Characterisation of the Filler Fraction in CAD/CAM Resin-Based Composites vol.14, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14081986
  21. Repair bond strength and surface topography of resin‐ceramic and ceramic restorative blocks treated by laser and conventional surface treatments vol.84, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23672
  22. Additive 3-dimensional printing as a novel tool for pre- and postsurgical evaluation and patient education vol.152, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2020.10.009
  23. The effect of different storage media on the monomer elution and hardness of CAD/CAM composite blocks vol.37, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.04.009
  24. Effect of CAD-CAM ceramic materials on the color match of veneer restorations vol.126, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.029
  25. Flexural properties and wear behavior of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing resin blocks vol.40, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-381
  26. Computer Aided Design / Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD / CAM) Post and Core - A Review vol.10, pp.36, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2021/640
  27. Does Preheating Resin Cements Affect Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Restorations? vol.14, pp.19, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195603
  28. Chairside CAD/CAM Materials: Current Trends of Clinical Uses vol.10, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111170
  29. Clinical wear and quality assessment of monolithic and lithium disilicate layered zirconia restorations vol.66, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12869
  30. Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis vol.14, pp.24, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247791