DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Frequency of different maxillary sinus septal patterns found on cone-beam computed tomography and predicting the associated risk of sinus membrane perforation during sinus lifting

  • Sigaroudi, Ali Khalighi (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kajan, Zahra Dalili (Dental Sciences Research Center, Department of Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Rastgar, Shabnam (Private Dental Office, Guilan University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Asli, Hamid Neshandar (Dental Sciences Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences)
  • 투고 : 2017.05.03
  • 심사 : 2017.10.31
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31

초록

Purpose: Analyzing different patterns of maxillary sinus septa in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and predicting maxillary sinus membrane perforations. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, CBCT images of 222 patients ranging from 20 to 81 years old were evaluated. One hundred fifty-two patients (93 females and 59 males) who had maxillary sinus septa in axial views were included in this study. Cross-sectional images were used to determine classifications of sinus septa and the risk of membrane perforation using a method modified from Al-Faraje et al. Variables of sex, age, and dental status were considered. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for data analysis(P<.05). Results: In this study, 265 maxillary sinus septal patterns were found. The mean age of the patients was $44.1{\pm}14.7$ years old. The Class I and VII-div II patterns had the greatest and least prevalence, respectively. Furthermore, there was a significant relationship between the location of septa and the frequency of membrane perforation risk (P<.05). In this study, the relationship of different patterns of septa with dental status did not differ significantly (P>0.05). Conclusion: A higher prevalence of moderate risk of membrane perforation in the molar region relative to the premolar region was observed. Furthermore, maxillary sinus septa occur most frequently in the molar region, demonstrating the importance of paying attention to this region during sinus lift surgery. This study did not show any relationship between tooth loss and the presence of septa.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Al-Faraje L. Surgical complications in oral implantology: etiology, prevention, and management. Hanover Park: Quintessence; 2011. p. 153-60.
  2. Lee WJ, Lee SJ, Kim HS. Analysis of location and prevalence of maxillary sinus septa. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010; 40: 56-60. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.2.56
  3. Nkenke E, Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 Suppl 4: 124-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01776.x
  4. van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 256-65. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003256.x
  5. Krennmair G, Ulm CW, Lugmayr H, Solar P. The incidence, location, and height of maxillary sinus septa in the edentulous and dentate maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57: 667-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90427-5
  6. Underwood AS. An inquiry into the anatomy and pathology of the maxillary sinus. J Anat Physiol 1910; 44: 354-69.
  7. Maestre-Ferrin L, Galan-Gil S, Rubio-Serrano M, Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha-Oltra D. Maxillary sinus septa: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15:e383-6.
  8. Wen SC, Chan HL, Wang HL. Classification and management of antral septa for maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013; 33: 509-17. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1609
  9. Rancitelli D, Borgonovo AE, Cicciu M, Re D, Rizza F, Frigo AC, et al. Maxillary sinus septa and anatomic correlation with the Schneiderian membrane. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26: 1394-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001725
  10. van Zyl AW, van Heerden WF. A retrospective analysis of maxillary sinus septa on reformatted computerised tomography scans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 1398-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01802.x
  11. Malec M, Smektala T, Tutak M, Trybek G, Sporniak-Tutak K. Maxillary sinus septa prevalence and morphology-computed tomography based analysis. Int J Morphol 2015; 33: 144-8. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000100023
  12. Park YB, Jeon HS, Shim JS, Lee KW, Moon HS. Analysis of the anatomy of the maxillary sinus septum using 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69:1070-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.020
  13. Kim MJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Kim KD, Choi SH, Kim CK, et al. Maxillary sinus septa: prevalence, height, location, and morphology. A reformatted computed tomography scan analysis. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 903-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050247
  14. Malkinson S, Irinakis T. The influence of interfering septa on the incidence of Schneiderian membrane perforations during maxillary sinus elevation surgery: a retrospective study of 52 consecutive lateral window procedures. Oral Surg 2009; 2:19-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-248X.2009.01038.x
  15. Velasquez-Plata D, Hovey LR, Peach CC, Alder ME. Maxillary sinus septa: a 3-dimensional computerized tomographic scan analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 854-60.
  16. Gosau M, Rink D, Driemel O, Draenert FG. Maxillary sinus anatomy: a cadaveric study with clinical implications. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2009; 292: 352-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20859
  17. Ella B, Noble Rda C, Lauverjat Y, Sedarat C, Zwetyenga N, Siberchicot F, et al. Septa within the sinus: effect on elevation of the sinus floor. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 46: 464-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.01.016
  18. Rosano G, Taschieri S, Gaudy JF, Lesmes D, Del Fabbro M. Maxillary sinus septa: a cadaveric study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 1360-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.069
  19. Naitoh M, Suenaga Y, Kondo S, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Assessment of maxillary sinus septa using cone-beam computed tomography: etiological consideration. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11 Suppl 1: e52-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00194.x
  20. Shen EC, Fu E, Chiu TJ, Chang V, Chiang CY, Tu HP. Prevalence and location of maxillary sinus septa in the Taiwanese population and relationship to the absence of molars. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 741-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02195.x
  21. Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Mischkowski RA, Dreiseidler T, Scherer P, Ketterle M, et al. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy by cone-beam CT prior to sinus floor elevation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 258-65.
  22. Koymen R, Gocmen-Mas N, Karacayli U, Ortakoglu K, Ozen T, Yazici AC. Anatomic evaluation of maxillary sinus septa: surgery and radiology. Clin Anat 2009; 22: 563-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20813
  23. Pommer B, Ulm C, Lorenzoni M, Palmer R, Watzek G, Zechner W. Prevalence, location and morphology of maxillary sinus septa: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39: 769-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01897.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis of maxillary sinus septa by cone-beam computed tomography vol.48, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.03419
  2. Radiological changes in maxillary sinus morphology after lateral sinus floor augmentation vol.74, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1679
  3. Risk factors for sinus membrane perforation during lateral window maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery: A retrospective study vol.23, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13052