한국건축시공학회지 (Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction)

  • 제17권6호
  • /
  • Pages.567-576
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1598-2033(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-5706(eISSN)
한국건축시공학회 (The Korean Institute of Building Construction)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

NOSACQ-50을 활용한 건설현장 작업자들의 안전 인식 수준에 관한 연구

Safety Perception Level of Workers in Construction Site According to NOSACQ-50

  • Ha, Seung-Yong (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Kuk (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Son, Seung-Hyun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Ha, Sun-Geun (School of Architectural Engineering, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Son, Ki-Young (School of Architectural Engineering, University of Ulsan)
  • 투고 : 2017.09.15
  • 심사 : 2017.10.24
  • 발행 : 2017.12.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 국내 건설현장의 작업자들을 대상으로 NOSACQ-50을 활용하여 안전인지 수준을 분석하는 것이다. 이 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 첫째, 선행연구 고찰을 실시하여 안전 분위기의 개념을 명확히 정의한다. 둘째, 근로자의 안전분위기 수준을 측정하기 위하여 NOSACQ-50을 활용한 설문조사를 실시한다. 셋째, 수집된 데이터를 분석하여 안전 분위기 수준을 평가한다. 그 결과, 한국의 안전분위기 수준은 NOSACQ-50에서 제시한 표준값에 비해 심각한 것으로 나타났다. 최종적으로, 안전분위기 수준의 주요 요인들을 도출하고 이에 대한 대응방안을 제시하였다. 본 연구는 향후 NOSACQ-50과 같은 국내 건설현장에 맞는 안전인식 수준평가 도구 개발을 위한 기초자료로 활용될 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze safety perception level of workers in construction site according to NOSACQ-50. To achieve the objective of this study, First, literature review is conducted to clearly define the concept of safety climate. Second, NOSACQ-50 is used to survey the level of safety climate of workers. Third, statistical analysis based on collected data is conducted to examine the level of safety climate. As a result, the level of safety climate in South Korea was found to be serious comparing with the standard value proposed in NOSACQ-50. Finally, the improvements were suggested after investigating the key factors on the level of safety climate. In the future, this study will be used as a baseline for developing safety awareness assessment tools such as NOSACQ-50 for domestic construction sites.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee HS. Current status of industrial accident occurrence in 2016[Internet]. Seoul(Korea): Ministry of Employment and Labor; 2017 Mar[cited 2017 Apr 12]. 27 p. Available from: http://www.kosha.or.kr/cms/generate/FileDownload.jsp?content_id=370792&category_id=554&version=5.1&file_name=370792_2016.hwp
  2. Lee HS. Current status of industrial accident occurrence in 2015[Internet]. Seoul(Korea): Ministry of Employment and Labor; 2016 Mar[cited 2016 Apr 24]. Available from: http://www.kosha.or.kr/cms/generate/FileDownload.jsp?content_id=363787&category_id=554&version=12.0&file_name=363787_2015.hwp
  3. Park SK. The effects of organizational psychosocial factors on occupational accidents. Social Welfare Policy. 2003 Jun;16(6): 61-78.
  4. Moon SH. An analysis on factors affecting industrial accidents. Journal of Korean Association of Social Welfare Policy. 2004 Dec;20:155-69.
  5. Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006 Jul;91(4):946-53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
  6. Kjestveit K, Tharaldsen J, Holte KA. Young and strong: what influences injury rates within building and construction?. Safety Science Monitor. 2011 Aug;15(2):1-15.
  7. Holte KA, Kjestveit K, Lipscomb HJ. Company size and differences in injury prevalence among apprentices in building and construction in Norway. Safety science. 2015 Jan;71(c): 205-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.01.007
  8. Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1980 Mar;65(1):96-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
  9. Mohamed S. Scorecard approach to benchmarking organizational safety culture in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2003 Feb;129(1):80-8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(80)
  10. Denison DR. Organizational culture and organizational Climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. The Academy of Management Review. 1996 Jul;21(3):619-54. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9702100310
  11. Arezes PM, Sergio Miguel A. The role of safety culture in safety performance measurement. Measuring Business Excellence. 2003 Dec;7(4):20-8. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040310509287
  12. Cooper MD. Towards a model of safety culture. Safety science. 2000 Nov;36(2):111-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7
  13. Ha SY. Analysis of safety climate recognition of Korea construction industry[mater's thesis]. [Gyeonggi (Korea)]: Kyung Hee University; 2017. 87 p.
  14. Hudson P. Implementing a safety culture in a major multi-national. Safety Science. 2007 Jul;45(6):697-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.04.005
  15. Kines P., Lappalainen J, Mikkelsen, KL, Olsen E, Pousette A, Tharaldsen J, and Torner M. Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): a new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2011 Nov;41(6):634-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2011.08.004
  16. Brown RL, Holmes H. The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 1986 Feb;18(6):455-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(86)90019-9
  17. Eiff G. Organizational safety culture. Proceeding of Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. 1999 May 3-6; Columbus, OH. International Journal of Aviation Psychology; 1996. p. 778-83.
  18. Glendon AI, Clarke S, McKenna EF. Human safety and risk management. 2nd rev. ed. Boca Raton(FL): CRC Press; 2006. 528 p.
  19. Cheyne A, Cox S, Oliver A, Tomas JM. Modelling safety climate in the prediction of levels of safety activity. Work & Stress. 1998 Sep;12(3):255-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678379808256865
  20. Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2000 Jan;5(3):347-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
  21. Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP, Gerras SJ. Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003 Feb;88(1):170-8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.170
  22. Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP. Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: the role of perceived organizational support and leadermember exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1999 Apr;84(2):286-96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.286
  23. Zohar D, Luria G. The use of supervisory practices as leverage to improve safety behavior: a cross-level intervention model. Journal of Safety Research. 2003 May;34(5):567-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.05.006
  24. Hudson P. Achieving a safety culture for aviation. Journal of Aviation Management. 2003 Jan;3(1):27-47.
  25. Cronbach, Lee J. Coefficient alpha and the internet structure of the tests. Psychometrika. 1951 Feb;6(3):297-334.
  26. Moon KS, Chang YC. A study on the organizational safety culture and safety leadership: POSCO case. The Korea Academy of Business Historians. 2013 Sep;28(3):25-44.
  27. Neal A, Griffin MA, Hart PM. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety science. 2000 Feb;34(1):99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4
  28. Dedobbeleer N, Beland F. A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research. 1991 Jun;22(2):97-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(91)90017-P
  29. Wiegmann DA, Zhang H, Terry L, Thaden V, Sharma G, Gibbons AM. Safety clutre: an integrative review. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 2004 Nov;14(2):117-34 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap1402_1