DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optical Property and Surface Morphology Control by Randomly Patterned Etching

불규칙 패턴 에칭에 의한 표면 형상 제어와 광학적 특성

  • Kim, Sung Soo (Gaingongyoung Corporation) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Woo (Department of Energy & Environmental Engineering, Shinhan University) ;
  • Jeon, Bup Ju (Department of Energy & Environmental Engineering, Shinhan University)
  • 김성수 ((주)가인공영) ;
  • 이정우 (신한대학교 에너지환경공학과) ;
  • 전법주 (신한대학교 에너지환경공학과)
  • Received : 2017.10.12
  • Accepted : 2017.10.26
  • Published : 2017.12.01

Abstract

Randomly patterned and wet chemical etching processes were used to treat anti-glare of display cover glasses. The surface and optical properties of grain size and surface morphology controlled by randomly patterned etching and wet chemical solution etching were investigated. The surface morphology and roughness of the etched samples were examined using a spectrophotometer and a portable surface roughness (Ra) measuring instrument, respectively. The gloss caused by reflection from the glass surface was measured at $60^{\circ}$ using a gloss meter. The surface of the sample etched by the doctor-blade process was more uniform than that obtained from a screen pattern etching process at gel state etching process of the first step. The surface roughness obtained from the randomly patterned etching process depended greatly on the mesh size, which in turn affected the grain size and pattern formation. The surface morphology and gloss obtained by the etching process in the second step depended primarily on the mesh size of the gel state etching process of the first step. In our experimental range, the gloss increased on decreasing the grain size at a lower mesh size for the first step process and for longer reaction times for the second step process.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Verhaverbeke, I. Teerlinck, C. Vinckier, G. Stevens, R. Cartuyvels, and M. M. Heyns, J. Electrochem. Soc., 141, 2852 (1994). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2059243]
  2. M. Sekine, Appl. Surf. Sci., 192, 270 (2002). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00031-4]
  3. J. K. Kang and C. B. Musgrave, J. Chem. Phys., 116, 275 (2002). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1420729]
  4. T. E. Myers, S. Shanmugam, T. S. Alan, M. J. Towner, K. W. Uhlig, and L. Zhang, U.S. 20130299452 A1, 14 November, 2013.
  5. E. Wang and Y. Zhao, Opt. Lett., 39, 3748 (2014). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.003748]
  6. V. Bliznetsov, H. M. Lin, Y. J. Zhang, and D. Johnson, J. Micromech. Microeng., 25, 087002 (2015). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/25/8/087002]
  7. C. T. Lee, Appl. Chem. Eng., 27, 101 (2016). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.14478/ace.2016.1005]
  8. G.A.C.M. Spierings, J. Mater. Sci., 28, 6261 (1993). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01352182]
  9. S. S. Kim, J. S. Hwang, and B. J. Jeon, J. Korean Inst. Electr. Electron. Mater. Eng., 28, 607 (2015). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.4313/JKEM.2015.28.9.607]