DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Characteristics of Curriculum Design of Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers Participating in Educational Program for Teaching in Science Museum

과학관 활용 수업을 위한 교육 프로그램에 참여한 예비화학교사의 교수 설계에서 나타나는 특징

  • Choi, Sookyeong (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Song, Nayoon (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Noh, Taehee (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2017.08.25
  • Accepted : 2017.11.02
  • Published : 2017.12.20

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the characteristics of curriculum design of pre-service chemistry teachers who participated in educational program for teaching in science museum. Three pre-service chemistry teachers at a college of education in Seoul participated. The educational program was composed of workshop, lesson planning and practice, and critique. After the workshop, we conducted semi-structured interviews based on pre-visit, during-visit, post-visit activities planned by the pre-service teachers. We observed and recorded their teaching practices in Gwacheon National Science Museum and following critique by their classmates. We also conducted final interviews. We used a framework for museum practice to analyze their curriculum design. The analyses of the results revealed that all planned their lessons in accordance with the National Science Curriculum, and considered geographical and psychological aspects in their pre-visit activities. They encouraged students to make joint products through small group activities, and gave students autonomy in choosing exhibits to facilitate spontaneous participation. However, they did not consider continuous aspects of pre-visit, during-visit, and post-visit activities. They did not effectively induce students to engage during-visit activities cognitively. They did not make post-visit activities connect students' experiences in science museum to personal experiences.

이 연구에서는 과학관 활용 수업을 위한 교육 프로그램에 참여한 예비화학교사의 교수 설계에서 나타나는 특징을 분석하였다. 서울 소재의 사범대학에 재학 중인 예비화학교사 3명이 참여하였다. 교육 프로그램은 워크숍, 수업 계획 및 시연, 평가회로 구성하였다. 워크숍 후 예비교사가 제작한 방문 전, 중, 후 활동지를 토대로 반구조화된 면담을 실시하였고, 국립과천과학관에서 시연한 수업과 이에 대한 평가회를 관찰 및 녹음하여 이를 바탕으로 최종 면담을 실시하였다. 활동지, 수업 시연 및 면담내용을 과학관 학습 수행 전략 틀의 요소로 분석하여 예비교사의 교수 설계에서 나타나는 특징을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 모든 예비교사가 학교 교육과정과의 연계를 고려하여 수업을 계획하였고, 지리적, 심리적 측면을 고려하여 방문 전 활동을 계획하였다. 또한 공동의 산출물을 낼 수 있는 소집단 활동을 계획하였고, 학생에게 선택의 기회를 주어 학생의 자발적인 참여를 촉진하였다. 그러나 예비교사들은 방문 전, 중, 후 활동 사이의 연계에 대해 잘 고려하지 못하였다. 방문 중 활동에서는 학생의 인지적 참여를 효과적으로 이끌어내지 못하였고, 방문 후 활동에서도 학생의 개인적인 경험에 대한 고려가 부족하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, D.; Lucas, K. B.; Ginns, I. S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2003, 40, 177. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10071
  2. Chang, H.-S.; Choi, K.-H. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2006, 6, 425.
  3. Kim, S.-H.; Song, J.-W. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 2003, 23, 544.
  4. Kwon, Y.-Y.; Jeong, E. Biology Education 2015, 43, 412. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.4.412
  5. Tran, L. U. Science Education 2007, 91, 278. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20193
  6. Jarvis, T.; Pell, A. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2005, 42, 53. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20045
  7. Allen, S. In Learning conversations in museum; Leinhardt, G.; Crowley, K.; Knutson, K., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey, U.S.A., 2002; p 259.
  8. DeWitt, J.; Osborne, J. International Journal of Science Education 2007, 29, 685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600802254
  9. Griffin, J.; Symington, D. Science Education 1997, 81, 763. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199711)81:6<763::AID-SCE11>3.0.CO;2-O
  10. Kisiel, J. F. Journal of Science Teacher Education 2003, 14, 3. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022991222494
  11. Julyan, C.; Duckworth, E. In Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and practice; Fosnot, C. T., Ed.; Teachers College Press: New York, U.S.A., 1996; p 107.
  12. Han, M.; Yang, C.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2014, 34, 33. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.1.1.0033
  13. Choi, K.; Chang, H.; Lee, H. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education 2006, 25, 331.
  14. Griffin, J. Science Education 2004, 88, S59. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20018
  15. Han, M.; Yang, C.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2010, 30, 1060.
  16. Han, M.; Yang, C.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2014, 34, 559. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0559
  17. Kim, J.; Oh, Y.; Choi, K. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2012, 12, 261.
  18. Chang, H.; Lee, H. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education 2008, 27, 211.
  19. Adam, J. D.; Gupta, P. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2017, 54, 121. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21270
  20. Wallace, C. S. Journal of Science Teacher Education 2013, 24, 811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9337-0
  21. Anderson, D.; Lawson, B.; Mayer-Smith, J. Teaching Education 2006, 17, 341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210601017527
  22. Luehmann, A. L. Science Education 2007, 91, 822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20209
  23. Yang, C.; Bae, Y.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2015, 35, 95. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.1.0095
  24. Arellano, E. L.; Barcenal, T. L.; Bilbao, P. P.; Castellano, M. A.; Nichols, S.; Tippins, D. J. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2001, 38, 502. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1016
  25. Harrington, H. L. Teaching and Teacher Education 1995, 11, 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00027-4
  26. Pang, J.; Kim, S.; Choi, J. The Mathematical Education 2009, 48, 61.
  27. Falk, J. H.; Dierking, L. D. LeArning from Museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning; AltaMira Press: CA, U.S.A., 2000.
  28. Song, J. W.; Kim, C.-J.; Kim, H.-B.; Yoo, J.; Lee, K. H.; Chae, H. K. The Study Book for Inquiry Learning of Primary, Middle, and High School Connected with Exhibits of the Gwacheon National Science Museum; The Gwacheon National Science Museum: Gyeonggi, 2009
  29. Guisasola, J.; Solbes, J.; Barragues, J.; Morentin, M.; Moreno, A. International Journal of Science Education 2009, 31, 2085. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802353536
  30. Tal, R.; Bamberger, Y.; Morag, O. Science Education 2005, 89, 920. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20070
  31. Borun, M.; Chambers, M.; Cleghorn, A. Curator 1996, 39, 123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1996.tb01084.x
  32. Lucas, K. B. Science Education 2000, 84, 524. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200007)84:4<524::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-X
  33. Price, S.; Hein, G. E. International Journal of Science Education 1991, 13, 505. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130502
  34. Bang, A. R.; Choi, A. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2016, 60, 342. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.5.342
  35. Kang, C.-S. Research in Social Studies Education 2014, 21, 67.
  36. Lee, H.-J.; Chang, J.-E.; Kim, H.-B. Biology Education 2013, 41, 181. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.2.181
  37. Noh, T.; Lee, J.; Kang, H. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2012, 32, 1187. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1187