DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of Educational Service Quality and Participation Intention on Educational Performance through a Case of Action Learning

교육서비스 품질과 참여의도가 교육성과 향상에 미치는 연구: Action Learning 사례를 중심으로

  • Lee, DonHee (Department of Business Administration, Inha University)
  • Received : 2017.09.06
  • Accepted : 2017.10.19
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of educational service quality, participation intention, and educational performance in action learning class. Methods: The proposed research model is tested using structural equation modeling for hypotheses based on the data collected from one of action learning class. Results: The results indicate that educational service quality(reliability, assurance, tangibles, empathy, information accuracy, and relationship quality) positively affects participation intention which in turn improve educational performance, including aspects of before and after class of action learning. In addition, participation intention in classroom positively affects educational performance with both groups. For after class of action learning, the result confirms the effect of responsiveness of educational service quality on participation intention, however, in before class of action learning there is not showed a significant relationship. Conclusion: This study would provide useful information and can be applied to the improvement of educational performance through the participation of students by the instructors and the educational institutes who want to apply the active learning forum in classroom.

Keywords

References

  1. An, Jung-A. 2013."A study on continuing participation of adult learners in university affiliated lifelong education institutions : focused on participation intention, learning environment, programs, relationship in education institutions." Dong-Eui University, Thesis.
  2. Basogain, X., Olabe, M., Olabe, J., and Rico, M. 2017. Computational Thinking In Pre-University Blended Learning Classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior. Accessed Sep. 6 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563217303011.
  3. Bettencourt, L. A. 1997. "Customer Voluntary Performance: Customer as Partnership Service Delivery." Journal of Retailing 73(3):383-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90024-5
  4. Bong, Hyeon Cheol. 2005. Professor Bong Hyun-chul's Successful Study for Action Learning Workbook. DasanSogo: Seoul.
  5. Chin, W. W. 1998. The Partial Least Squares Approach To Structural Equation Modeling. In Marcoulides, G. A. (ed.), Modern methods for Business research, 295-336. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  6. Choi, M. S., Han, K. S., and Jeung, J. B. 2011. "A Study On How Quality of Education Service Impacts Employee'S Job Satisfaction and Management Performance."Journal of the Korea Management Engineers Society 16(3):159-181.
  7. Cohen, J. O. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  8. Cronin, J., Brady, M., and Hult, G. 2000. "Assessing the Effects of Quality, Value, and Customer Satisfaction on Customer Behavioral Intentions in Service Environments."Journal of Retailing 75(2):193-218.
  9. Cuthbert, P. F. 1996. "Managing Service Quality in HE: is SERVQUAL the answer?."Managing Service Quality 6(3):31-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604529610115858
  10. Detert, J. R., Schroeder, R. G., and Cudeck, R. 2003. "The Measurement of Quality Management Culture in Schools: Development and Validation of the SQMCS." Journal of Operations Management 21(3):307-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00130-4
  11. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. 1997."Improvements on Cross Validation: The 0.632+ bootstrapmethod." Journal of the American Statistical Association 92(438):548-560.
  12. Folk, C., Remington, R., and Johnston, J. 1992."Involuntary Covert Orienting is Contingent on Attentional Control Settings."Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18(4):1030-1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
  13. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. 1981."Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error." Journal of Marketing Research 18(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  14. Greence, H. 2011. "Freshmen Marketing: A First-Year Experience with Experiential Learning." Marketing Education Review 21(1):79-88. https://doi.org/10.2753/MER1052-8008210111
  15. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. 2013. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling(PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  16. Harvey, L., and Askling, B. 2003. "Quality in higher education." The Dialogue Between Higher Education Research And Practice: 69-83.
  17. IMD(International Institute for Management Development), Accessed Sep.6. http://www.imd.org/.
  18. Kim, Jeong-Hee, and Park, Tong-Jin. 2012. "The effects of student satisfaction and loyalty on University education service: A Case of National University." Consumer Policy And Education Review 8(3):47-68.
  19. Kim, Tae Ho, and Na, Sang Gyun. 2014. "A Study on the Factors Affecting Management Educational Service Quality of Small Enterprise :With a Focus on the Relationship among Education Satisfaction, Relationship Quality and Re-Use." Korea Association of Business Education 29(5):167-187.
  20. Kim, Young-Pyo. 2016. "The Impact of Quality of University Education Service on Students' Satisfaction and Switching Intention." Tourism & Leasure Research 28(10):115-131.
  21. Korobova, N. 2012. A Comparative Study of Student Engagement, Satisfaction, and Academic Success among International and America Students. Graduate These and Dissertations Iowa State University.
  22. Lee, Cho-A. 2014(A). A Stusy on the Effect of Education performance and Satisfaction in the Service Academy. Pukyoung University, Thesis.
  23. Lee, DonHee 2016. "A Case Study of Educational Service Quality Improvement on Active Learning." Korean Society for Quality Management, Fall Conference, Seoul.
  24. Lee, Han Kyung. 2014(B). "The Relationship Between Fun Factors, Class Satisfaction And Continuos Participation Intention Of University Students Attending Required Physical Education Class." Korean Society for Early Childhood Physical Education 15(2):55-67.
  25. Lee, Kyung Cheol. 2004."Causal Model Study on the Effect of Eduation Service Quality on Students Satisfaction, University Image and Behavior Intention." The Korean Educational Administration Society 22(4):287-309.
  26. Lee, Kyung Cheol, and Lee, Myung Sik. 2007. "Study of Cause and Effect Model among Variables Related to Service Quality for Enhancing Productivity of University Education." Productivity Review 21(2):1-35.
  27. Lee, Yeong-Hee. 2014. "The Effects of Educational Service Quality on Relationship Quality and Customer Loyalty and The Moderating Effects of School-grade." Korean Journal of Business Administration 27(2):263-284.
  28. Lee, Young Hwan, and Jeon, Hea June. 2011. "Students' Information Communication Skill Affecting Relationship Among Technology Acceptance, Education Service Quality, Relationship Quality, And Education Service Satisfaction." Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research 16(5):73-81. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2011.16.5.073
  29. Letcher, D., and Neves, J. 2010. "Determinants of undergraduate business student satisfaction." Research in Higher Education Journal 6:1-26.
  30. Lindsay, A. 1981. "Assessing Institutional Performance in Higher Education: A Managerial Perspective." Higher Education 10(6):687-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676865
  31. Lo, C. 2010. "How Student Satisfaction Factors Affect Perceive Learning."Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10(1):47-54.
  32. Markman, G., Balkin, D., and Baron, R. 2002. "Inventors and New Venture Formation: The Effects of General Self-Efficacy and Regretful Thinking."Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27(2):149-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00004
  33. Marquardt, M. 2004. "The Power of Learning in Action Learning: A Conceptual Analysis of How The Five Schools of Adult Learning Theories are Incorporated within The Practice of Action Learning." Action Learning: Research and Practice 1(2):185-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1476733042000264146
  34. Minerva School, Accessed Sep. 6. https://www.minerva.kgi.edu/.
  35. Ministry of Education & Korean Educational Development Institute. 2016. Brief Statistics on Korean Education.
  36. Mourshed, M., Krawitz, M., and Dorn, E. 2017. "How to improve student educational outcomes: New insights from data analytics." McKinsey & Company, September.
  37. Noh, Jeongsuk, and Jang, Hyeongyu. 2015. "The Effects of Service Quality of IT Education on Student Satisfaction and Education Performance: The Moderating effects of Education Commitment." The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research 15(4):101-119.
  38. Nunnally, J.C. 1978. Psychometric Theory (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  39. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., and Berry, L. 1988. "SERVQUAL: A Multiple-item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing 64(1):12-40.
  40. Park, Chae Heung and Yoo, Yeon Sook.. 2007. "The effects of Educational Service Quality on Student Satisfaction and Career Exploration Behavior: Focused on Secretarial Departments in Junior College." Ewha Management Review 24(2):33-60.
  41. Park, Jae-Hwan and Kim, Yong-Tae. 2009. "An Empirical Study of Effect and Improvement of Entrepreneurship Education." Korean Industrial Economic Association 22(2):959-977.
  42. Quinn, A., Lemay, G., Larsen, P., and Johnson, D. 2009. "Service Quality in Higher Education." Total Quality Management 20(2):139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360802622805
  43. Revans, R. 1980. Action Learning: New Techniques for Management. London: Blond & Briggs, Ltd.
  44. Sallis, E. 2002. Total Quality Management in Education. London: Psychology Press.
  45. Shim, Woo-Geuk. 2015. "A Study on the Domestic Research Trend of Educational Service Quality." Korean Review of Management Consulting 6(1):55-76.
  46. Shuen, A. 2008. Web 2.0: A Strategy Guide. California: O'Reilly Media Press.
  47. Suh, Chang Jeog, Jun, Hui Jeon, and Kim, Yeong Taeg. 2003. "An Effect on Educational Service Quality of Degree of Contact through Internet." Korea Service Management Society 4(1):129-151.
  48. Stappenbelt, B. 2017. "Action learning in undergraduate engineering thesis supervision."Journal of Technology and Science Education 7(1):5-25. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.224
  49. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y., and Lauro, C. 2005. "PLS Path Modeling." Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 48(1):159-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  50. Verma, S., and Prasad, R. 2012. "Valuing Quality in Educational Services: An Empirical Study."European Journal of Business and Management 4(19):129-140.
  51. Ysseldyke, J., Krentz, J., Elliott, J., Thurlow, M., Erickson, R., and Moore, M. 1998. NCEO Framework for Educational Accountability. National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.