Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Democratic Participation Under Authoritarianism in Hong Kong and Singapore

  • Sanborn, Howard (International Studies and Political Science, Virginia Military Institute)
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Scholars have long debated the factors that drive political participation and have recently applied theories, developed from analyses of citizens from Europe and the United States, to respondents in the democratizing countries of Asia. In both Hong Kong and Singapore, however, citizens attend rallies and contact officials - yet do so under authoritarian governance. Are the causes of political participation in these cities similar to what is observed in other groups of respondents across Asia? Or, do institutions influence whether individuals participate? In this paper, I evaluate the development of liberal norms of engagement in both cities as a function of traditional models of participation. As citizens in these cities possess some of the highest standards of living in the region, they should also face frustrations with the limited democratic accountability of their leaders. Ultimately, individuals in each city have developed support for democracy but, given the differing goals of each regime, the nature of democratic engagement differs considerably. In Singapore, citizens are mobilized to engage and participate but support the status quo. By contrast, engaged Hong Kong residents participate out of a frustration with the government, a function of their high levels of internal efficacy and institutional detachment.

Keywords

References

  1. Balch, George I. 1974. "Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept of Sense of Political Efficacy." Political Methodology 1 (2): 1-41.
  2. Blais, Andre. 2010. "Political Participation." In Comparing Democracies 3: Elections and Voting in the 21st Century, edited by Leduc, Lawrence, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris, 165-183. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  3. Chiu, Yvonne. "Is Hong Kong Setting The Example That Democracy Is Possible Everywhere?" Forbes: Capital Flows. 16 October 2014.
  4. Chu, Yun-han, and Min-hua Huang. 2010. "Solving an Asian Puzzle" Journal of Democracy 21(4): 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2010.0009
  5. Craig, Stephen C. 1979. "Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior: An Attempt to Resolve a Lingering Conceptual Dilemma." American Politics Research 7 (2): 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X7900700207
  6. Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion in Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Dalton, Russell J. 2008. "Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation." Political Studies 56 (1): 76-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x
  8. Denton, Ginger L. 2016. Political Participation In Asia: Typologies Of Political Behavior Across Democratizing States. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
  9. di Palma, Giuseppe. 1970. Apathy and Participation: Mass Politics in Western Societies. New York: The Free Press.
  10. Diamond, Larry. 2012. "Why East Asia-Including China-Will Turn Democratic Within a Generation." The Atlantic. 24 January 2012.
  11. Dinas, Elias. 2014. "Does Choice Bring Loyalty? Electoral Participation and the Development of Party Identification." American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12044
  12. Fan, Yun. 2004. "Taiwan: No Civil Society, No Democracy" in Alagappa, Muthiah. ed. Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  13. Finkel, Steven E., Edward N. Muller, and Karl-Dieter Opp. 1989. "Personal Influence, Collective Rationality, and Mass Political Action." American Political Science Review 83 (3): 885-903. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962065
  14. Finkel, Steven E., and K. D. Opp. 1991. "Party Identification and Participation in Collective Political Action." Journal of Politics 53 (2): 339-371. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131763
  15. Gamson, William A. 1968. Power and Discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
  16. Hlavac, Marek (2015). stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. R package version 5.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer.
  17. Kadir, Suzaina. 2004. "Singapore: Engagement and Autonomy Within the Political Status Quo" in Alagappa, Muthiah. ed. Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  18. Kim, Sunhyuk. 2004. "South Korea: Confrontational Legacy and Democratic Contributions" in Alagappa, Muthiah. ed. Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  19. Mok, Ka Ho. 2006. Education Reform and Education Policy in East Asia. New York: Routledge.
  20. Norris, Pippa. 1999. "Conclusion: The Growth of Critical Citizens and its Consequences" In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, edited by Norris Pippa, 257-272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Nie, Norman H., Jane Junn, and Kenneth Stehlik-Berry. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  22. Pollock, III, Philip H. 1982. "The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy: A Research Note" The Western Political Quarterly 36(3): 400-409. https://doi.org/10.2307/448398
  23. Postiglione, Gerald A. 1992. "The Decolonization of Hong Kong Education." in Postiglione, Gerald A. (ed.) Education and Society in Hong Kong: Toward One Country and Two Systems. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  24. Rose, Richard and Doh Chull Shin. 2001. "Democratization Backwards: The Problem of Third-Wave Democracies." British Journal of Political Science 31(2): 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401000138
  25. Sanborn, Howard. 2015. "Democratic Consolidation: Participation and Attitudes Toward Democracy in Taiwan and South Korea." Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 25(1): 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2014.996158
  26. Sanborn, Howard. Forthcoming. "Broken Back? Efficacy and Participation in Asia's Democracies." Asian Journal of Comparative Politics.
  27. Schafferer, Christian. 2010. "Consolidation of Democracy and Historical Legacies: A Case Study of Taiwan." Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 9(1): 23-41. https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2010.9.1.023
  28. Shih, Chih-yu. 2003. "Back from the Future: Ambivalence in Taiwan's Democratic Conditions." Asian Barometer Working Paper Series: No. 7. Taipei.
  29. South China Morning Post. 6 February 2014. "Legco election 2016: How a handful of voters elect 30 Hong Kong lawmakers." Accessed 23 May 2016: http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1421613/legco-election-2016-how-handful-voters-elect-30-hong-kong-lawmakers
  30. Scott, Ian. 1992. "An Overview of the Hong Kong Legislative Council Elections of 1991." In Kwok, Rowena, Joan Leung, and Ian Scott (eds). Votes Without Power: The Hong Kong Legislative Council Elections 1991. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  31. The Straits Times. 2015 "Singapore is top Asian nation for gender equality: UN report." Accessed 20 May 2016: http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/singapore-is-top-asian-nation-for-gender-equality-un-report
  32. Torcal, Mariano, and Ingacio Lago. 2006. "Political Participation, Information, and Accountability: Some Consequences of Political Disaffection in New Democracies." In Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions, and Politics, edited by Torcal Mariano and Jose Ramon Montero, 308-331. New York: Routledge.
  33. Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  34. Verba, Sidney, Kay Scholzman, and Henry Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  35. World Bank 2016. GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2011 international $) Accessed on 20 May 2016: http://beta.data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD
  36. Yau, Elaine. "Hong Kong Follows Global Trend with Women Dominating Higher Education." South China Morning Post. 17 January 2014.