Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회 (World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

All rants and no substance?: A new framework for studying the rationality of cyberspace

  • Soon, Carol (Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore) ;
  • How, Tan Tarn (Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore)
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

While the Internet has been used to galvanise people for the collective good, many have voiced concerns over the noise and vitriol present online and polarisation. In Singapore where the government regulates traditional mainstream media such as print and broadcast, the online space has been described as a "Wild Wild West" rife with rumours, untruths and misinformation. Such developments do not only exert a potential negative effect on the deliberative nature of public discourse but also skew bias towards the online space, affecting the ability of online users to communicate with authority and power. This study seeks to examine the rationality of the cyberspace through using a new "rationality" framework to analyse political discourse online. Comprising objectivity, emotionality and partisanship, the rationality framework was applied to a content analysis of 197 blogs with political content in 2014. The analysis indicated that the online political space was not the Wild Wild West that it was touted to be with significant levels of objectivity and non-partisanship. There was a stark absence of emotional discourse, and relationships were observed between bloggers' anonymity and rationality. Cognisant of academia's and policymakers' interest on the quality and effects of online discourse, the proposed analytical framework and the study findings hold implications for both developed and developing countries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adamic, L.A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog. Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data, proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discover, Chicago, Illinois, pp.36-43.
  2. Banerjee, I. (2002). The locals strike back? Gazette: The International Journal for Communications Studies, 64(6), 517-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485020640060101
  3. Bar-Ilan, J. (2005). Information hub blogs. Journal of Information Science, 31(4), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551505054175
  4. Bartlett, R.C. & Collins, S.D. (2011). Nicomachean ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  5. Bostock, D. (2000). Aristotle's ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Converse, P.E., & Pierce, R. (1985).Measuring partisanship. Political Methodology, 11(3/4), 143-166.
  7. Derks, D., Bos, A.E.R., & Grumbkow, J. (2007).Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 842-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.013
  8. Diddi, A., Fico, F., & Zeldes, G. A. (2014).Partisan balance and bias TV network coverage of the 2000, 2004, and 2008 Presidential Elections. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.906431
  9. George, C. (2006). Contentious journalism and the Internet: Towards democratic discourse in Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
  10. Halberstam, Y., & Knight, B. (2016). Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter. Journal of Public Economics, 143, 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.011
  11. Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Bonus, S., & Wright, E. (2004). Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Track 4, Vol. 4.
  12. Ho, S. S., & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 35(2), 190-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207313159
  13. Hsu, C., Park, S.J., & Park, H.W. (2013). Political discourse among key Twitter users: The case of Sejong City in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 12(1), 65-79. Retrieved from http://www.ndsl.kr/soc_img/society/aths/OSTRBU/2013/v12n1/OSTRBU_2013_v12n1_65.pdf https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2013.12.1.065
  14. Hume, D. (2010). A treatise of human nature. The Project Gutenberg EBook. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4705/4705-h/4705-h.htm
  15. Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  16. Knoblock, J. (1998). Xunzi: A translation and study of the complete works: -Vol. I, Books 1-6. Stanford University Press.
  17. Kuo, C. Y. (1995). The making of a new nation: Cultural construction and national identity. In B. H. Chua (Ed.), Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore (pp. 101-123). London: Routledge.
  18. Legge, J. (2011). The works of Mencius. Dover Publications.
  19. Lin, J., Halavais, A., & Zhang, B. (2007). The blog network in America: Blogs as indicators of relationships among US cities. Connections, 27(2), 15-23.
  20. Macintyre, A. (1991). Precis of whose justice? Which rationality? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51(1) (Mar 1991), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107828
  21. Media Development Authority (28 May 2013). News releases. Retrieved from http://www.mda.gov.sg/AboutMDA/NewsReleasesSpeechesAndAnnouncements/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?news=4
  22. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.
  23. Park, H.W., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Developing network indicators for ideological landscapes from the political blogosphere in South Korea. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13: 856-879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00422.x
  24. Radford, M.L. (2006). Encountering virtual users: A qualitative investigation of interpersonal communication in chat. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1046-1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20374
  25. Ramos, A.G. (1981). The new science of organisations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Co.
  26. Rains, S. A. (2007). The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34(1), 100-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206296084
  27. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York: HarperPerennial.
  28. Riva, G. (2002). The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediated communication: The present and future of technology-based Interactions. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour, 5(6), 581-598. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102321018222
  29. Simon, T.F., Fico, F., & Lacy, S. (1989). Covering conflict and controversy: Measuring balance, fairness, defamation. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 2, 427-434.
  30. Skoric, M. M. & Poor, N. D. (2013). Youth engagement in Singapore: The interplay of traditional and social media. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 57, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.761706
  31. Soon, C., & Cho, H. (2011).Flows of relations and communication among Singapore political bloggers and organizations: The networked public sphere approach. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 8, 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2010.514538
  32. Soon, C. & Kluver, R. (2014). Uniting political bloggers in diversity: Collective identity and web activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated-Communication, Journal of Computer-Mediated-Communication,19(3), 500-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12079
  33. Sunstein, C. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. (pp.19-45). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  34. Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0226
  35. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2013) The strategic ritual of emotionality: A case study of Pulitzer Prize-winning articles. Journalism, 14(1), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912448918
  36. We Are Social (2015, January). Digital, Social & Mobile in 2015. Retrieved from http://wearesocial.sg/blog/2015/01/digital-social-mobile-2015/
  37. Xue, J. (2013, 25 September). New fault lines may have emerged in society: DPM Teo. Retrieved from http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/new-fault-lines-may-have-emerged-society-dpm-teo