Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences

The Korean Space Science Society (한국우주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics and Geoeffectiveness of Small-scale Magnetic Flux Ropes in the Solar Wind

  • Kim, Myeong Joon (Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Kyung Sun (Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Dae-Young (Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Choi, Cheong-Rim (Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Rok Soon (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute) ;
  • Cho, Kyungsuk (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute) ;
  • Choi, Kyu-Cheol (SELab, Inc.) ;
  • Kim, Jaehun (The Korean Space Weather Center of National Radio Research Agency)
  • Received : 2017.11.13
  • Accepted : 2017.11.30
  • Published : 2017.12.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Magnetic flux ropes, often observed during intervals of interplanetary coronal mass ejections, have long been recognized to be critical in space weather. In this work, we focus on magnetic flux rope structure but on a much smaller scale, and not necessarily related to interplanetary coronal mass ejections. Using near-Earth solar wind advanced composition explorer (ACE) observations from 1998 to 2016, we identified a total of 309 small-scale magnetic flux ropes (SMFRs). We compared the characteristics of identified SMFR events with those of normal magnetic cloud (MC) events available from the existing literature. First, most of the MCs and SMFRs have similar values of accompanying solar wind speed and proton densities. However, the average magnetic field intensity of SMFRs is weaker (~7.4 nT) than that of MCs (~10.6 nT). Also, the average duration time and expansion speed of SMFRs are ~2.5 hr and 2.6 km/s, respectively, both of which are smaller by a factor of ~10 than those of MCs. In addition, we examined the geoeffectiveness of SMFR events by checking their correlation with magnetic storms and substorms. Based on the criteria Sym-H < -50 nT (for identification of storm occurrence) and AL < -200 nT (for identification of substorm occurrence), we found that for 88 SMFR events (corresponding to 28.5 % of the total SMFR events), substorms occurred after the impact of SMFRs, implying a possible triggering of substorms by SMFRs. In contrast, we found only two SMFRs that triggered storms. We emphasize that, based on a much larger database than used in previous studies, all these previously known features are now firmly confirmed by the current work. Accordingly, the results emphasize the significance of SMFRs from the viewpoint of possible triggering of substorms.

Keywords

References

  1. Burlaga LF, Magnetic clouds and force-free fields with constant alpha, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 7217-7224 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1029/JA093iA07p07217
  2. Cane HV, Richardson IG, Interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the near-Earth solar wind during 1996-2002, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 1156 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009817
  3. Cartwright ML, Moldwin MB, Comparison of small-scale flux rope magnetic properties to large-scale magnetic clouds: Evidence for reconnection across the HCS? J. Geophys. Res. 113, A09105 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013389
  4. Cartwright ML, Moldwin MB, Heliospheric evolution of solar wind small-scale magnetic flux ropes, J. Geophys. Res. 115, A08102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014271
  5. Farrugia CJ, Burlaga LF, Osherovich VA, Richardson IG, Freeman MP, et al., A study of an expanding interplanetary magnetic cloud and its interaction with the Earth's magnetosphere: The interplanetary aspect, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 7621-7632 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1029/92JA02349
  6. Feng HQ, Wu DJ, Lin CC, Chao JK, Lee LC, et al., Interplanetary small- and intermediate-sized magnetic flux ropes during 1995-2005, J. Geophys. Res. 113, A12105 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013103
  7. Goldstein H, On the field configuration in magnetic clouds, in Solar Wind Five, eds. M. Neugebauer (NASA, Washington D.C., 1983), 731-733.
  8. Gosling JT, Pizzo V, Bame SJ, Anomalously low proton temperatures in the solar wind following interplanetary shock waves-evidence for magnetic bottles?, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 2001-2009 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1029/JA078i013p02001
  9. Gosling JT, McComas DJ, Phillips JL, Bame SJ, Geomagnetic activity associated with earth passage of interplanetary shock disturbances and coronal mass ejections, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 7831-7839 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA00316
  10. Gopalswamy N, Yashiro S, Xie H, Akiyama S, Makela P, Properties and geoeffectiveness of magnetic clouds during solar cycles 23 and 24, J. Geophys. Res. 120, 9221-9245 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021446
  11. Hwangbo JE, Bong SC, Park SH, Lee DY, Cho KS, et al., Burst locating capability of the Korean solar radio burst locator (KSRBL), J. Astron. Space Sci. 32, 91-99 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.1.91
  12. Klein LW, Burlaga LF, Interplanetary magnetic clouds At 1 AU, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 613-624 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA02p00613
  13. Lee J, Recent progress in understanding solar magnetic reconnection, J. Astron. Space Sci. 32, 101-112 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2140/JASS.2015.32.2.101
  14. Lopez RE, Solar cycle invariance in solar wind proton temperature relationships, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 11189-11194 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA10p11189
  15. Marubashi K, Interplanetary Magnetic Flux Ropes and Solar Filaments, in Coronal Mass Ejections, vol. 99, Geophysical Monohraph Series, eds. Crooker N, Joselyn JA, Feynman J (American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. 1997) 147-156.
  16. Marubashi K, Lepping RP, Long-duration magnetic clouds: a comparison of analyses using torus- and cylinder-shaped flux rope models, Ann. Geophys. 25, 2453-2477 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2453-2007
  17. Moldwin MB, Phillps JL, Gosling JT, Scime EE, McComas DJ, et al., Ulysses observation of a noncoronal mass ejection flux rope: Evidence of interplanetary magnetic reconnection, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 19903-19910 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA01123
  18. Moldwin MB, Ford S, Lepping R, Slavin J, Szabo A, Small-scale magnetic flux ropes in the solar wind, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 57-60 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010724
  19. Park W, Lee J, Yi Y, Ssessanga N, Oh S, Storm sudden commencements without interplanetary shocks, J. Astron. Space Sci. 32, 181-187 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.3.181
  20. Romashets EP, Vandas M, Force-free field inside a toroidal magnetic cloud, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2065 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017692
  21. Richardson IG, Cane HV, Regions of abnormally low proton temperature in the solar wind (1965-1991) and their association with ejecta, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 23397-23412 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA02684
  22. Richardson IG, Cane HV, Near-Earth interplanetary coronal mass ejections during solar cycle 23 (1996-2009), Sol. Phys. 264, 189-237 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-010-9568-6
  23. Shimazu H, Vandas M, A self-similar solution of expanding cylindrical flux ropes for any polytropic index values, Earth Planets Space 54, 783-790 (2002). http://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351731
  24. Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD, The Interplanetary Causes of Magnetic Storms: A Review, in Magnetic Storm, vol. 98, Geophysical Monograph Series, eds. Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD, Kamide Y, Arballo JK (American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C. 1997), 77-89.
  25. Wu CC, Liou K, Lepping RP, Hutting L, Plunkett S, et al., The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24: the St. Patrick's day event (17 March 2015). Earth Planets Space 68, 151 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0525-y
  26. Zhang G, Burlaga LF, Magnetic clouds, geomagnetic disturbances, and cosmic ray decreases, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 2511-2518 (1988). http://doi.org/10.1029/JA093iA04p02511
  27. Zhang J, Richardson IG, Webb DF, Gopalswamy N, Huttunen E, et al., Solar and interplanetary sources of major geomagnetic storms (Dst ${\leq}$ −100 nT) during 1996-2005, J. Geophys. Res. 112, A10102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012321