STI Policy Review

Science & Technology Policy Institute (과학기술정책연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Rise of Korean Innovation Policy for Social Problem-Solving: A Policy Niche for Transition?

  • Seong, Jieun (Science and Technology Policy Institute (STEPI)) ;
  • Song, Wichin (Science and Technology Policy Institute (STEPI)) ;
  • Lim, Hongtak (Busan Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (BISTEP))
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Technology supply has been the main thrust of the Korean government's science & technology policy, focusing on the development and acquisition of new technology in line with the catching-up strategy of economic growth and industrial development. However, new social or societal problems have become major government policy issues, heralding new innovation policy aimed to address them. Such new policy initiatives for social problem-solving present a niche where the existing system of government innovation policy process is challenged, including such processes as goal-setting, planning, implementation, project management, and evaluation. The rigidity of the existing institution of government innovation policy, however, still shapes the content and progression of innovation policy for social problem-solving. This study reviews Korean innovation policy for social problem-solving as a policy niche, and aims to clarify its challenges and opportunities. It uses a system transition framework to explain the emergence and evolution of the innovation policy niche in Korea. The main research question is to what extent and in what aspect the existing innovation policy regime shaped innovation policy for social problem-solving. The study examines the inertia of the current paradigm of innovation policies and R&D programs, and sheds light on the search for a distinctive identity for innovation policies that tackles social problems.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, H. S., Vergragt, P. J., Green, K., & Berchicci, L. (2004). Ch. 9: Bounded socio-technical experiments (BSTEs): Higher order learning for transitions towards sustainable mobility. In B. Elzen, F. Geels, & K. Green. System innovation and the transition to sustainability (pp. 191-221). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  2. Choung, J. (2015). Beyond the catch-up: Light and shade of post catch-up. Seoul: Sinseowon Press.
  3. Choung J., Hwang, H. & W. Song (2014). Transitions of innovation activities in latecomer countries: An exploratory case study of South Korea. World Development, 54(Feb.), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.013
  4. Geels, F. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a casestudy. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
  5. Geels, F. (2004). Understanding system innovations: A critical literature review and a conceptual synthesis. In B. Elzen, F. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability (pp. 19-47). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  6. Kemp, R., & Rotmans, J. (2004). Managing the transition to sustainable mobility. System innovation and the transition to sustainability (pp. 137-167). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  7. Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2010). The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009
  8. National Research Foundation (NRF) (2013). Guide for social problem-solving R&D program. Seoul: NRF.
  9. National Research Foundation (NRF) (2014). Guide for social problem-solving R&D program. Seoul: NRF.
  10. National Science & Technology Council (NSTC) (2012). New science and technology program strategies. Gwachon: NSTC.
  11. National Science & Technology Council (NSTC) (2013). Comprehensive implementation plan for the science and technology-based solutions to social problems. Gwachon: NSTC.
  12. Seong, J., & Song, W. (2010). Post catch-up innovation and integrated innovation policy. Science and Technology Studies, 10(2), 1-36.
  13. Seong, J., Song, W., Jeong, B., Kim, M., Park, M., & Jeong, Y. (2012). Readjustment of STI governance for sustainability (Policy Research 2012-06). Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  14. Song, W. (2013). Transition towards sustainable socio-technical system. Science and Technology Policy, 23(4), 4-16.
  15. Song, W. & Seong, J., (2013). Science and technology innovation policy to solve social issues. Paju: Hanwool Publishing Co.
  16. Song, W., Seong, J., Hong, S., Han, C., & Park, J. (2012). Issues and challenges of societal innovation policy (Investigation Research 12-03). Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  17. Song, W., Seong, J., Kim, Y., Hwang, H., & Cheong, J. (2006). Exploration of post catch-up technology innovation system (Policy Research 2006-25). Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  18. Song, W., Seong, J., Kim, J., Jang, Y., Jeong, B., & Lee, E. (2014), Participatory governance of innovation policy for tackling societal challenges (Policy Research 2014-04). Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  19. Song, W., Seong, J., Kim, J., Jang, Y., Jeong, S., & Park, I. (2015). The research on the socio-technical transition (Research Paper 2015-22). Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  20. Van den Bosch, S. (2010, September 16). Transition experiments: Exploring societal changes towards sustainability. Erasmus University Rotterdam. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/20714
  21. Van den Bosch, S., & Rotmans, J. (2008). Deepening, broadening and scaling up: A framework for steering transition experiments (Publication No. 2). Knowledge Centre for Sustainable System Innovations and Transitions (KCT). Retrieved from http://www.transitiepraktijk.nl/files/Broadening,%20deepening,%20scaling%20up.pdf
  22. Yang, H. (2014, July). Status and challenges of multi-ministry R&D project for solving social problems. Presented at the [Science and Technology + social innovation] Forum. Seoul: STEPI