Evaluation of outcomes of continuing professional education in implant dentistry using Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model

커크 패트릭 모형을 이용한 임플란트 연수 교육 효과 평가

  • Yun, Kyoung-In (Department of Dental Services Management and Informatics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Hyungkil (Department of Dental Services Management and Informatics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myeng Ki (Department of Dental Services Management and Informatics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 윤경인 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 의료경영정보학교실) ;
  • 최형길 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 의료경영정보학교실) ;
  • 김명기 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 의료경영정보학교실)
  • Received : 2015.08.05
  • Accepted : 2015.10.15
  • Published : 2016.01.01

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the outcomes of continuing professional education in implant dentistry using Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model. Material and methods: The study was carried out through a questionnaire distributed to dentists who attended a continuing professional education in implant dentistry, 2008~2012. They were asked to fill out questionnaires at least 6 months after its completion. Results: Mean ages of total 23 dentist was $44.8^{\circ}{\ae}8.2$. Mean period after completion of education was $2.7^{\circ}{\ae}1.2$. Knowledge (level 2) (r=0.71, p<0.01) and behavior (level 3) (r=0.68, p<0.01) was positively correlated with topic and methods of education in reaction (level 1). Behavior was positively correlated with knowledge (r=0.79, p<0.01). Result (level 4) was positively correlated with knowledge (r=0.64, p<0.01) and behavior (r=0.86, p<0.01). Conclusion: Reaction affects on knowledge, behavior and result in order.

Keywords

References

  1. Cowpe J, Plasschaert A, Harzer W, et al. Profile and competences for the graduating European dentistupdate 2009. Eur J Dent Edu 2010;14:193-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2009.00609.x
  2. Towle A. Continuing medical education: Changes in health care and continuing medical education for the 21st century. BMJ 1998;316:301-304.
  3. Cantillon P, Jones R. Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference? BMJ 1999;318:1276. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1276
  4. 윤경인, 김명기. 치과의사 계속교육프로그램 현황조사. 대한치과의료관리학회지 2015;3:57-68.
  5. Cervero RM, Schon DA. Effective continuing education for professionals: Jossey-Bass San Francisco; 1988.
  6. McDonald C. A review of continuing professional education. J Continu Higher Edu 2001;49:29-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377366.2001.10400421
  7. Mann KV. The role of educational theory in continuing medical education: Has it helped us? J Continu Edu Health Professions 2004;24:S22-S30. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340240505
  8. Park NR, Jeong IS, Lee JG, et al. Evaluation of field epidemiology specialist training program based on the satisfaction and the changes of educational needs. J Preventive Med Public health 2004;37:80-87.
  9. 황은정, 문정주. 공공병원 공공보건의료사업 담당자를 위한 교육프로그램이 학습목표 성취도와 교육반응도에 미치는 효과. 보건교육건장증진학회지 2011;12:27-37.
  10. 이승희, 신좌섭, 김도환, et al. Kirkpatrick 의 4 단계 평가 모델을 활용한 이종욱-서울 프로젝트 1차년도 성과 평가. Korean J Med Educ 2014;26:41-51. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2014.26.1.41
  11. Kirkpatrick D. Great ideas revisited. Training and Development 1996;50:54-59.
  12. Kirkpatrick DL. Implementing the Four Levels: A Practical Guide for Effective Evaluation of Training Programs: Easyread Super Large 24pt Edition: 2009.
  13. Hansen LH, Rush DD. Evaluating Continuing Professional Development. Training Development 2008;49:41-45.
  14. 황금복 전, 김태숙, 양병국, et al. 보건요원 교육 효과 평가. 한국간호교육학회지 1999;5:118-132.
  15. Boakes J, Gardner D, Yuen K, et al. General practitioner training in palliative care: an experiential approach. J Palliative Care 2000;16:11. https://doi.org/10.1177/082585970001600203
  16. Gormley G, Steele W, Stevenson M, et al. A randomised study of two training programmes for general practitioners in the techniques of shoulder injection. Ann Rheu Dis 2003;62:1006-1009. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.62.10.1006
  17. Curran VR, Hoekman T, Gulliver W, et al. Webbased continuing medical education (II): Evaluation study of computer-mediated continuing medical education. J Continu Edu Health Professions 2000;20:106-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340200207
  18. Goldberg H, Deyo R, Taylor V, et al. Can evidence change the rate of back surgery? A randomized trial of community-based education. Effective clinical practice: ECP 2000;4:95-104.
  19. Kay E, Silkstone B, Worthington H. treatment planning: Evaluation of computer aided learning in developing clinical decision-making skills. Br Dent J 2001;190:554-557. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801033
  20. Bahrami M, Deery C, Clarkson J, et al. Effectiveness of strategies to disseminate and implement clinical guidelines for the management of impacted and unerupted third molars in primary dental care, a cluster randomised controlled trial. Brit Den J 2004;197:691-696. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811858
  21. Regehr G, Mylopoulos M. Maintaining competence in the field: learning about practice, through practice, in practice. J Continu Educ Health Professions 2008;28:19-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.203
  22. Bullock A, Firmstone V, Frame J, et al. Enhancing the benefit of continuing professional development: a randomized controlled study of personal development plans for dentists. Learning in health and social care 2007;6:14-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2007.00142.x
  23. Patel R, Batchelor P, Merali F, et al. The impact of continuing professional development in dentistry: a literature review. General Dental Council of UK. 2011.
  24. Spicer R. Mentoring and personal development planning in postgraduate dental education: a review. Dent update 2004;31:472-474, 477-480.
  25. Ivanovski S, Mattheos N, Scholz S, et al. University postgraduate training in implant dentistry for the general dental practitioner. Aust Dent J 2010;55:339-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01247.x
  26. Ucer TC, Botticelli D, Stavropoulos A, et al. Current trends and status of continuing professional development in implant dentistry in Europe. Eur J Dent Educ 2014;18 Suppl 1:52-59.
  27. Barnes E, Bullock AD, Bailey SE, et al. A review of continuing professional development for dentists in Europe. Eur J Dent Educ 2012;16:166-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00737.x
  28. Mattheos N, de Bruyn H, Hultin M, et al. Developing implant dentistry education in Europe: the continuum from undergraduate to postgraduate education and continuing professional development. Eur J Dent Educ 2014;18 Suppl 1:3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12075
  29. Seckinger RJ, Weintraub AM, Berthold PB, et al. The status of undergraduate implant education in dental schools outside the United States. Implant dentistry 1995;4:105-110. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199505000-00005
  30. Mattheos N, Albrektsson T, Buser D, et al. Teaching and assessment of implant dentistry in undergraduate and postgraduate education: a European consensus. Eur J Dent Educ 2009;13 Suppl 1:11-17.
  31. Mattheos N, Ivanovski S, Heitz-Mayfield L, et al. University teaching of implant dentistry: guidelines for education of dental undergraduate students and general dental practitioners. An Australian consensus document. Aust Dent J 2010;55:329-332.
  32. Donos N, Mardas N, Buser D. An outline of competencies and the appropriate postgraduate educational pathways in implant dentistry. Eur J Dent Educ 2009;13:44-54.