통상정보연구 (International Commerce and Information Review)

한국통상정보학회 (Korea Association for International Commerce and Information)
권호 표지

우리나라 중소기업의 공공기술 사업화 영향요인에 관한 연구

An Exploratory Study on Factors Impacting the Public Technology Commercialization in Korean SMEs

  • 투고 : 2016.08.19
  • 심사 : 2016.09.15
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 우리나라에서 공공부문으로부터 기술이전을 받은 중소기업에 대한 사업화 성과와 이에 대한 영향에 관한 연구이다. 2014년 기술이전사업화조사분석자료집에 따르면 공공부문에서 기술이전을 받은 기술 중 약30%만이 활용되고 있고 나머지 70%는 미활용되거나 방치상태이다. 상대적으로 대학 및 출연연 등 공공기관의 기술사업화 지원 역량 또한 발전이 더딘 상황이다. 이에 따라 공공부문 기술사업화를 통해 중소기업의 발전을 추동하고, 혁신 성과를 확산하기 위해서는 지속적이고 체계적인 정책적인 지원이 필요한 상황이다. 본 논문에서는 공공부문 기술이전 이후 중소기업의 활용 및 사업화 등에 관한 전주기적 분석을 통해 사업화 성공과 실패 요인을 조사하였다. 최근 3년간 진행된 중소기업기술통계조사를 기반으로 하여 기술사업화 성공기업을 도출하고, 기술사업화의 활용형태에 따라 성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 분석을 하였다. 통계 분석 결과, 공공기술을 기반으로 한 사업화 성공 중소기업은 기술개발 성공건수 및 지식재산 등록건수가 많아질수록 사업화 성공률에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 불필요하게 많은 기술개발, 계획 단계에서 긴 리드 타임 등의 경우 사업화 실패가능성이 높다는 것을 확인했다. 이러한 분석결과는 최근 양적인 차원에서 지원되는 중소기업의 기술개발 시도가 모두 긍정적인 효과를 발휘하기 어렵다는 정책 함의를 도출 할 수 있다. 또한 이를 위해 효율성 및 성공 가능성이 높은 기술사업화에 대한 선택적 지원이 필요하다는 것을 정책 함의로 도출할 수 있다.

This paper investigates the success and failure factors of technology commercialization for SMEs developing public sector technologies. The 2014 Korea Technology Transfer Commercialization Status Report states that only 30% of the technologies that are transferred are being used and the rest are neglected. The objective of this paper is to determine the relationship between quantitative variables and the success rate of technology commercialization of 1,222 SMEs in Korea by using three analyzes (cross tabulation, process and logistic) methodologies to increase the success of public technology commercialization. The outcome shows that the number of successful technology deployment cases and the number of IPR registration cases have a positive impact on the success rate of public technology commercialization. The statistical outcome also verifies that unnecessary technology development, more attempts and failures of technology development, and longer lead time in the planning phase have a negative impact on the success rate of the public technology development and commercialization. For policy implications, the government should be selective in supporting public technology commercialization and development for SMEs as not all technology attempts exert positive effects.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Amadi-Echendu, J.E., and Rasetlola, R.T. (2011). Technology Commercialization Factors, Frameworks and Models. Paper presented at the IEEE Int'l Technology Management Conference. San Jose, California. DOI: 10.1109.
  2. Carvalho, L. C. (2015). Handbook of Research on Internationalization of Entrepreneurial Innovation in the Global Economy. Hershey: Business Since Reference (an imprint of IGI Global).
  3. Kang, J., Gwon, S. H., Hong, S., Kim, Y., & Cho, K. (2011). Determinants of the technology commercialization of the government-sponsored firms: Empirical evidence from Korean manufacturing. Paper presented at the PICMET: Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings.
  4. Korean Federation of SMES (KBIZ) (2013). 2011-2013 SME Technology Census Data and Survey Report. Seoul: KBIZ.
  5. Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) (2014). Technology Transfer Program Analysis Data. Seoul: KIAT.
  6. Kim, S.W., and Park, M.S. (2013). SME R&D Policy Report: Activation Plan for the Implementation of the Creative Economy. Seoul: KBIZ.
  7. Kim. Y.R. (2001). Technology Commercialization in Republic of Korea. WIPO. Retrieved February, 2016 from http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/uipc/en/documents/pdf/tmc_korea.pdf.
  8. Lenagh, A. (2012). The importance of technology transfer [Web log message]. Retreived February 21, 2016 from http://www.unemed.com/blog/the-importance-of-technology-transfer.
  9. Morberg, D. and Moon, G. (2000). Technology Commercialization - The Choices Facing Researchers. IEE E Canadian Review. Retrieved March 29, 2016 from http://canrev.ieee.ca/canrev35/tech_comm.pdf.
  10. Narasimhalu, A. D. (2006). A Framework for Technology Transfer. Paper presented at the Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET Conference: Instanbul, Turkey.
  11. Nevens, T. M., Summe, G.L., and Uttal, B. (1990). Commercializing Technology: What the Best Companies Do. Harvard Business Review. Retreived March 5, 2016 from https://hbr.org/1990/05/commercializing-technology-what-the-best-companies-do.
  12. OECD & World Bank. (2013). Policy intervention on technology transfer and commercialization. The Innovtion Policy Platform. Retreived March 3, 2016 from https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/content/policy-intervention-technology-transfer-and-commercialization.
  13. Park, J.B., Cho, Y.A., and Kwon, Y.K. (2010). Exploratory study on characteristics of technology commercialization in Korean firms. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 8, 2.
  14. Park, M.S. (2012). A Study of Technical Support Policy for Innovative SMEs. International Commerce and Information Review, 14, 1. https://doi.org/10.15798/kaici.14.3.201209.1
  15. Park, M.S. (2015). An Exploratory Study for Convergence-type Technology Transfer. International Commerce and Information Review, 17, 1.
  16. Patton, D. & Kenney, M. (2010) The role of the university in the genesis and evolution of research-based clusters, in: D. Fornahl, S. Henn & M.P. Menzel (Eds) Emerging Clusters: Theoretical, Empirical and Political Perspectives on the Initial Stage of Cluster Evolution, pp. 214-238 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
  17. Phan, P. H., and Siegel, D.S. (2006). The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned, Managerial and Policy Implications, and the Road Forward. Renseelaer Polytechnic Institute. Retrieved March 28, 2016 from http://www.economics.rpi.edu/workingpapers/rpi0609.pdf.
  18. Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., and Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 4, 691-791. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm023.
  19. University of Rochester (2016). University Policy on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer. Retreived March 24, 2016 from http://www.rochester.edu/ventures/for-ur-innovators/for-inventors-university-policy-on-intellectual-property-and-technology-transfer/
  20. Vanderbilt University. (2016). Policies. Retrieved February 3, 2016 from https://cttc.co/inventors/policies.
  21. West, D. M. (2012). Improving University Technology Transfer and Commercialization. Center for Technology Innovation, 20, Retreived February 12, 2016 from http://www.brookings.edu/-/media/Research/Files/Papers/2012/12/05-tech-transfer-west/DarrellUniversity-Tech-Transfer.pdf?la=en.
  22. Wong, P. K. and Singh, A. (2011). Do Co-Publications with Industry Lead to Higher Levels of University Technology Commercialization Activity?. Paper presented at the IEEE Int'l Technology Management Conference: San Jose, California, June 27-30.
  23. Yoon, Y. (2015). Factors of Technology Transfer and Commercialization: A Case Study of Researcher A. The Korean Entrepreneurship Society (KES). 41-1.