DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reproductive performance comparison between local and crossbred sows reared under backyard and farming condition in Rangamati district of Bangladesh

  • Hossain, M.I. (Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Chittagong veterinary and animal sciences university) ;
  • Momin, M.M. (Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Chittagong veterinary and animal sciences university) ;
  • Fakhrul Islam, K.M. (Faculty of veterinary medicine, Chittagong veterinary and animal sciences university) ;
  • Quader, M.N. (Faculty of veterinary medicine, Chittagong veterinary and animal sciences university) ;
  • Miah, G. (Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Chittagong veterinary and animal sciences university)
  • 투고 : 2016.07.27
  • 심사 : 2016.09.30
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30

초록

It is imperious to know the reproductive parameters of the subsisting swine breed for profitable farming in Bangladesh. This study was designed to compare the reproductive parameters of sows at hilly areas between the local and crossbred at farm and backyard level. A total of 116 breedable sows were included. The data on age at puberty, litter size, birth weight, weaning weight, gestation length, interval between farrowing and number of piglets born per sow in local and crossbred sows were determined and direct questionnaire method was used for data collection. The present study revealed that age at puberty between farm and backyard system of crossbred sows was $8.88{\pm}0.153$ and $9.85{\pm}0.221$ months, respectively. The farrowing interval was shorter in crossbred sows which were kept in farming system rather than backyard system. The interval between farrowing and onset of estrus was shorter in crossbred sows. The gestation length was almost similar between backyard and farm condition. The number of litter size per sow per farrowing was $8.45{\pm}0.41$ in crossbred and $7.17{\pm}0.250$ in local pigs at backyard system. The birth weight and weaning weight were more in farm conditions than backyard system. The age at puberty in local breed was lower than the crossbred and litter size was $8.45{\pm}0.407$ in crossbred which was higher than local breed $7.17{\pm}0.250$ in backyard system. These results suggest that reproductive parameters of local sow need to be improved for better production and crossbred sows should be reared for obtaining desired productivity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adamec, V., and Johnson, R. K. (1997). Genetic analysis of rebreeding intervals, litter traits, and production traits in sows of the National Czech nucleus. Livestock Production Science 48:13-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(96)01417-0
  2. Akdag, F., Arslan, S., and Demir, H. (2009). The effect of parity and litter size on birth weight and the effect of birth weight variations on weaning weight and pre-weaning survival in piglet. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8:2133-2138.
  3. Bhat, P. N., Taneja, V. K., and Garg, R. C. (1978). Effects of crossbreeding on reproduction and productive traits. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 48:7-78.
  4. Bon, S., Vigny, M., and Massoulie, J. E. A. N. (1979). Asymmetric and globular forms of acetylcholinesterase in mammals and birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 76:2546-2550. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.6.2546
  5. Carmichael, W. J., and Rice, J. B. (1920). Variations in farrow: with special reference to the birth weight of pigs. Bulletin (University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign campus). Agricultural Experiment Station; no. 226.
  6. Christenson, R. K., and Ford, J. J. (1979). Puberty and estrus in confinement-reared gilts. Journal of animal science 49:743-751. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.493743x
  7. Cole, H., H. (1996), Introduction to livestock production, Edn, Freeman and co. San Framciscoand London. Journal animal science 60:1372-1374.
  8. Durranc, L., and Maxson, C. A. (2008).Swine production on a small scale, Jr.Animal science 23:523-557.
  9. Hossain, M. E., Chakma, S., Khatun, M. M., Hasanuzzaman, M., Miah, M. Y., & Biswas, M. A. A. (2012). Production systems of swine in the rural areas of Rangamati and Khagrachari districts of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science 40:28-33.
  10. Johnson, A. K., Morrow-Tesch, J. L., and McGlone, J. J. (2001). Behavior and performance of lactating sows and piglets reared indoors or outdoors. Journal of animal science 79:2571-2579. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79102571x
  11. Knox, R. V., and Zas, S. R. (2001). Factors influencing estrus and ovulation in weaned sows as determined by transrectal ultrasound. Journal of animal science 79:2957. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79122957x
  12. Mazdiyasni, K. S., Lynch, C. T., and Smith, J. S. (1965). Preparation of Ultra High Purity Submicron Refractory Oxides. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 48:372-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1965.tb14764.x
  13. Motalab, M. A. (2013) Reproductive parameters of native sows in selected area of Bangladesh. MS Thesis, Department of surgery and obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary Science, BAU pp.1-27.
  14. Peltoniemi, M., Thurig, E., Ogle, S., Palosuo, T., Schrump, M., Wutzler, T., and Mikhailov, A. (2007). Models in country scale carbon accounting of forest soils. Silva Fennica 41:575.
  15. Phookan, A., Laskar, S., Aziz, A., and Goswami, R. N. (2006). Reproductive performance of indigenous pigs of the Brahmaputra valley of Assam.Tamilnadu J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2:121-125.
  16. Prasanna, J. S., Prakash, M. G., Gupta, B. R., and Mahender, M. (2009). Genetic study on reproductive traits in crossbred pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development 21(9).
  17. Rydhmer, L., Lundeheim, N., and Johansson, K. (1995). Genetic parameters for reproduction traits in sows and relations to performance test measurements. Journal of animal breeding and genetics 112:33-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.1995.tb00538.x
  18. Sharon, N., and Lis, H. (1993). Carbohydrates in cell recognition. Scientific American 268:82-89.
  19. Sinha, R. C., Rahman, M. A., Islam, M. T., and Abdullah-Al Mamun, M. (2014). Determination of reproductive parameters of sows at rural areas of Bangladesh. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research 2:74-79.
  20. Taylor G, and Roese, G. (2006). Basic pig husbandary. NSW, New South Wales, pp.89-98.
  21. Tilton, J. E., Foxcroft, G. R., Ziecik, A. J., Coombs, S. L., and Williams, G. L. (1982). Time of the preovulatory LH surge in the gilt and sow relative to the onset of behavioral estrus. Theriogenology 18:227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(82)90107-8
  22. Tummaruk, P., Suwimonteerbutr, J., and Laotanakit, A. (2003). The impact of indoor temperature and humidity on puberty attainment in gilts. In The 11th symposium of the world association of veterinary laboratory diagnosticians \ and OIE seminar on biotechnology, department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Science Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand (p.153).