DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of (-)-Epicatechin Gallate on porcine oocyte in vitro maturation and subsequent embryonic development after parthenogenetic activation and in vitro fertilization

  • Seo, Min-Su (Laboratory of Veterinary Embryology and Biotechnology, Veterinary Medical Center and College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • So, Kyoung-Ha (Laboratory of Veterinary Embryology and Biotechnology, Veterinary Medical Center and College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Hyun, Sang-Hwan (Laboratory of Veterinary Embryology and Biotechnology, Veterinary Medical Center and College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2016.07.08
  • Accepted : 2016.09.07
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

(-)-Epicatechin gallate (ECG) is a polyphenol compound of green tea exhibiting biological activities, such as antioxidant and anticancer effects. To examine the effect of ECG on porcine oocytes during in vitro maturation (IVM), oocytes were treated with 0-, 5-, 15-, and $25{\mu}M$ ECG. After maturation, we investigated nuclear maturation, intracellular glutathione (GSH) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and subsequent embryonic development after parthenogenetic activation (PA) and in vitro fertilization (IVF). After 42 hours of IVM, the $5{\mu}M$ group exhibited significantly increased (p< 0.05) nuclear maturation (89.8%) compared with the control group (86.1%). However, the $25{\mu}M$ group observed significantly decreased (p< 0.05) nuclear maturation (83.5%). In intracellular maturation assessment the 5-, 15-, and $25{\mu}M$ groups had significantly increased (p< 0.05) GSH levels and decreased ROS levels compared with the controls. The 5- and $15{\mu}M$ group showed significantly increased (p< 0.05) embryo formation rates and total cell number of blastocysts after PA (18% and 68.9, 15% and 85.1 vs. 12% and 59.5, respectively) compared with controls. Although the $25{\mu}M$ group observed significantly lower blastocyst formation rates after PA (27.6% vs. 23.2%) than control group, the $5{\mu}M$ group showed significantly increased blastocyst formation rates after PA (37.2% vs. 23.2%) compared to the control group. Furthermore, the $5{\mu}M$ group measured significantly increased blastocyst formation rates (20.7% vs. 8.6%) and total cell number after IVF ($88.3{\pm}1.5$ vs. $58.0{\pm}3.6$) compared to the control group. The treatment of $5{\mu}M$ ECG during IVM affectively improved the porcine embryonic developmental competence by regulating intracellular oxidative stress during IVM.

Keywords

References

  1. Prather RS, Hawley RJ, Carter DB, Lai L and Greenstein JL. 2003. Transgenic swine for biomedicine and agriculture. Theriogenology 59:115-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01263-3
  2. Meurens F, Summerfield A, Nauwynck H, Saif L and Gerdts V. 2012. The pig: a model for human infectious diseases. Trends Microbiol 20:50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.11.002
  3. Marco-Jimenez F, Llobat L and Vicente JS. 2010. Effects of lanosterol on in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes. Anim Reprod Sci 117:288-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.04.008
  4. Avery B, Faerge I, Grondahl C and Ottesen J. 1999. Nuclear maturation and embryo development of bovine oocytes, matured in a semi-defined medium supplemented with meiosis activating sterol (MAS). Theriogenology 51:367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)91926-X
  5. Siddiqui IA, Asim M, Hafeez BB, Adhami VM, Tarapore RS and Mukhtar H. 2011. Green tea polyphenol EGCG blunts androgen receptor function in prostate cancer. FASEB J 25:1198-1207. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.10-167924
  6. Thawonsuwan J, Kiron V, Satoh S, Panigrahi A and Verlhac V. 2010. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) affects the antioxidant and immune defense of the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish Physiol Biochem 36:687-697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-009-9344-4
  7. Khan N, Afaq F, Saleem M, Ahmad N and Mukhtar H. 2006. Targeting multiple signaling pathways by green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Cancer Res 66:2500-2505. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3636
  8. Higdon JV and Frei B. 2003. Tea catechins and polyphenols: health effects, metabolism, and antioxidant functions. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 43:89-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690390826464
  9. Shankar S, Ganapathy S, Hingorani SR and Srivastava RK. 2008. EGCG inhibits growth, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Front Biosci 13:440-452. https://doi.org/10.2741/2691
  10. Kao YH, Hiipakka RA and Liao S. 2000. Modulation of endocrine systems and food intake by green tea epigallocatechin gallate. Endocrinology 141:980-987. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.141.3.7368
  11. Basini G, Bianco F and Grasselli F. 2005. Epigallocatechin- 3-gallate from green tea negatively affects swine granulosa cell function. Domest Anim Endocrinol 28:243-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2004.10.002
  12. You J, Kim J, Lim J and Lee E. 2010. Anthocyanin stimulates in vitro development of cloned pig embryos by increasing the intracellular glutathione level and inhibiting reactive oxygen species. Theriogenology 74:777-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.002
  13. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Aitken JR and Johnson MH. 1990. Hydrogen peroxide levels in mouse oocytes and early cleavage stage embryos developed in vitro or in vivo. Development 109:501-507.
  14. Kwak SS, Jeung SH, Biswas D, Jeon YB and Hyun SH. 2012. Effects of porcine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on porcine in vitro-fertilized embryos. Theriogenology 77:1186-1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.10.025
  15. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IM and Iwamura S. 2002. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol Reprod 66:112-119. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.1.112
  16. Hall V, Hinrichs K, Lazzari G, Betts DH and Hyttel P. 2013. Early embryonic development, assisted reproductive technologies, and pluripotent stem cell biology in domestic mammals. Vet J 197:128-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.026
  17. Gil MA, Cuello C, Parrilla I, Vazquez JM, Roca J and Martinez EA. 2010. Advances in swine in vitro embryo production technologies. Reprod Domest Anim 45 Suppl 2:40-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01623.x
  18. Funahashi H and Day BN. 1997. Advances in in vitro production of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 52:271-283.
  19. Coy P and Romar R. 2002. In vitro production of pig embryos: a point of view. Reprod Fertil Dev 14:275-286. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD01102
  20. Kondo K, Kurihara M, Miyata N, Suzuki T and Toyoda M. 1999. Scavenging mechanisms of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate and (-)-epicatechin gallate on peroxyl radicals and formation of superoxide during the inhibitory action. Free Radic Biol Med 27:855-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00133-1
  21. De Matos D and Furnus C. 2000. The importance of having high glutathione (GSH) level after bovine in vitro maturation on embryo development: effect of ${\beta}$-mercaptoethanol, cysteine and cystine. Theriogenology 53:761-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00278-2
  22. Abeydeera L, Wang W, Cantley T, Prather R and Day B. 1998. Presence of ${\beta}$-mercaptoethanol can increase the glutathione content of pig oocytes matured in vitro and the rate of blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology 50:747-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00180-0
  23. Luberda Z. 2005. The role of glutathione in mammalian gametes. Reprod Biol 5:5-17.
  24. Brad AM, Bormann CL, Swain JE, Durkin RE, Johnson AE, Clifford AL and Krisher RL. 2003. Glutathione and adenosine triphosphate content of in vivo and in vitro matured porcine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 64:492-498. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10254
  25. Meister A. 1983. Selective modification of glutathione metabolism. Science 220:472-477. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6836290
  26. Wang ZG, Yu SD and Xu ZR. 2007. Effect of supplementation of green tea polyphenols on the developmental competence of bovine oocytes in vitro. Braz J Med Biol Res 40:1079-1085. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2007000800008