Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of the Research Trends in Safety Education for Home Economics Education

가정과 안전교육의 연구 동향 분석

  • Received : 2016.08.18
  • Accepted : 2016.09.13
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to suggest the basic information for diverse and balanced research and development in this field with understanding research trends related to safety education in home economics. In order to so, this study makes population and sampling by targeting cases which refer to 'safety' on 15 papers of academic journals related to home economics registered in the National Research Foundation from 2001 to 2015, 244 papers related to safety education area and 179 master doctorate thesis by searching keyword as 'safety'. Analysis contents are research trends of papers related to safety education by year and by subject and research trends of safety education by area and by research method. As a result of the study, first, the number of research papers related to safety education by year on home economics curriculum repeated increase and decrease and there have been consistent studies conducted on safety education with 14-52 papers per every year and yearly average 28.2 papers. On the other hand, the most number of studies conducted in 2015 with 52 papers which are twice as much of 26 papers in 2014. This seems to be affected by the announcement of safety comprehensive countermeasures from government and the emphasis of safety subject on 2015 curriculum revision of the Ministry of Education. Second, with regards to research trends by topic, 137 papers are related to safety education (29%), 336 papers are related to safety actual condition (71%). Accidents and recognition had a greater percentage in a paper before 2009 (74.4%) and studies are increased after 2009 (from 21 papers to 53 papers) in terms of development or evaluation of safety education program, development of education materials, development of education method etc. Subject area dealt with the most on the research of safety actual condition is regarding safety accidents or effective variables (23.2%). Subject regarding the variables are researches related to factors influencing family violence, internet addiction, spouse violence, willingness to purchase unsafe food, age harassment, or suicidal attempt etc. Next, researches related to safety recognition (13.9%), safety knowledge and attitude (7.4%), safety behaviors (6.3%), safety consciousness (2.3%) show in sequence. Subject area dealt with the most on the researches regarding safety education is development and evaluation of safety education program (11%) and this appears the most in 2015 by year (21.5%). Third, with regards to eight areas of safety education, there are 143 papers regarding public safety (33.8%), 106 papers regarding violence and personal safety (25.1%), 93 papers regarding general subject on safety or whole safety area (22%) and 58 papers regarding drug and internet addiction (13.7%) in sequence. And there is no paper related to first aid and 1 paper is related to occupational safety (0.2%). Occupational safety area is less researched nevertheless its included in home economic curriculum as relative chapter. First aid does not directly correlate with home economics curriculum but should be studied in preparation for accident which could happen in practical class. Forth, with regards to research trends by research method, quantitative research (89.1%) is mostly used and both research study (70.4%) and experimental research (18.7%) are used the most frequently. In particular, researches on the actual condition of safety education and experimental studies for effectiveness verification take most of research method. As qualitative studies, there are phenomenological study (3.1%) and case study (3.1%) related to actual conditions of safety accidents. 10 papers (2.4%) are mixture of quantitative and qualitative research and some research conducted research study and experimental research at the same time (0.9%). With regards to subject of study, human environments (87.5%) are more than physical environments (12.5) and students (48.4%) are more than teachers and school parents (20.6%). As the subject of physical environments, school (6.5%) is the most but home environment is none. As a result of the study, research for the development of evaluation tool for evaluating safety education, occupational safety and lifelong education should be conducted from this time forward. In addition, the object of study shall be expanded to both human environments in terms of entire life and physical environments for home. An in-depth qualitative research should be needed by observing and meeting with each student.

본 연구의 목적은 가정교과에서의 안전교육 관련 연구 동향을 파악하여 이 분야에서의 다양하고 균형 있는 연구개발을 위한 기초자료를 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 2001년부터 2015년까지 한국연구재단 등재지에 게재된 가정교과 관련 15개 학회지의 논문 중 '안전'을 직접적으로 언급한 경우와 안전교육 영역과 관련된 내용을 다룬 논문(244편)과 '안전'을 키워드로 제시하여 검색한 석 박사학위 논문(179편)을 대상으로전집 표집하였다. 분석 내용은 안전교육 관련 논문의 연도별 주제별 연구동향과 안전교육의 영역별 연구방법별 연구동향이다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가정과 교육에서 안전 교육에 관한 연도별 연구논문의 편수는 증가와 감소를 반복하여 매년 14-52편으로 연간 평균 28.2편 정도 지속적인 안전교육에 관련된 연구가 이어져온 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 2015년에는 논문 연구수가 2014년의 26편의 2배인 52편으로 가장 많은 연구가이루어졌는데 이는 정부의 안전종합대책 발표와 교육부의 2015개정 교육과정에서의 안전내용 강조 때문으로 생각된다. 둘째, 연구 주제의 동향을 살펴보면 안전교육관련 논문은 137(29%)편, 안전실태 관련 논문은 336편(71%)으로 2009년 이전에는 사고 실태나 인식 조사가 많은 비율을 차지(74.4%)하였고 반면, 2009년 이후에는 안전교육 프로그램 개발이나 효과 검증, 교육자료 개발, 교육방법 개발 등에 대한 연구가 증가(21편${\rightarrow}$53편)하였다. 안전실태 연구 중 가장 많이 다룬 주제영역은 안전사고와 관련이 있거나 영향을 주고 받는 변인에 대한 주제로(23.2%) 그 변인과 관련된 주제는 가정폭력에 영향을 미치는 요인, 인터넷 중독의 영향 요인, 부부 폭력에 영향을 미치는 요인, 위험 식품 구매 의사 영향 요인, 또래 괴롭힘 요인, 자살시도 요인 등과 관련된 연구 등이었다. 다음으로 안전 인식에 관련된 연구(13.9%), 안전지식 및 태도(7.4%), 안전행동(6.3%), 안전의식(2.3%)의 순으로 나타났다. 안전교육 관련 연구 중 가장 많이 다룬 주제영역은 안전교육 프로그램 개발 및 효과(11%)로 연도별로는 2015년에 가장 많았다(21.1%). 셋째, 안전교육의 8개 영역 중 생활안전이 143편(33.8%), 폭력 및 신변 안전 106편(25.1%), 안전에 대한 일반적인 주제나 안전의 영역 전체를 다룬 논문 93편(22%), 약물 및 인터넷 중독 안전 58편(13.7%) 순으로 나타났고, 응급처치와 관련된 논문은 없었으며, 직업안전의 경우 1편(0.2%)이었다. 직업안전의 영역은 가정교과에 관련단원이 있음에도 불구하고 적게 연구되고 있었고 응급처치는 가정교과 내용과 직접적인 연관은 없었지만 실습수업에서 일어날 수 있는 사고를 대비하여 연구될 필요가 있다. 넷째, 연구방법별 연구동향을 살펴보면 연구유형은 양적연구가 대부분(89.1%)으로 조사연구(70.4%)와 실험연구(18.7%)가 대표적으로 가장 빈번하게 사용되었다. 특히, 안전교육의 실태조사연구와 효과 검증인 실험연구가 거의 대부분을 차지하였으며 질적연구로는 안전사고 실태와 관련된 현상학적 연구(3.1%)와 사례연구(3.1%)가 있었다. 양적연구와 질적연구가 혼합된 형태는 10편(2.4%)이며, 조사연구와 실험연구가 동시에 진행된 연구도 있었다(0.9%). 연구대상에서 인적환경에 대한 연구(87.5%)가 물리적 환경에 대한 연구(12.5%)보다 많았고 교사나 학부모에 대한 연구(20.6%)에 비해 학생에 관한 연구(48.4%)가 많았다. 물리적인 환경 대상은 학교(6.5%)가 가장 많았지만, 가정환경에 대한 연구는 하나도 없었다. 본 연구의 결과, 추후에는 안전교육을 평가하는 평가도구 개발 연구와 직업안전에 대한 연구, 평생교육 측면을 주제로 한 연구가 필요하다. 또한, 연구대상을 전 생애 관점의 인적환경과 함께 가정을 대상으로 한 물리적 환경으로 확대할 필요가 있으며 학생 개개인을 관찰하고 면담을 통한 심도 있는 질적 연구도 필요할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, M. M. (1993). Philosophical studies in home economics: basic ideas by which home economists understand themselves. Michigan State University.
  2. Cho, M-G. (2007). A Study on the Improvement Options and Real Situation about Education of Experiment Class in Technical High School. Unpublished master's thesis, In Ha University of Education, In-Cheon, Korea.
  3. Choi, I-B. (1982). Safety lessons. Seoul: Jung used.
  4. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2014). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  5. Jun, J-W. (2004). (A) Study on elementary students' perception of safety education. Unpublished master's thesis, Jun-Ju University of Education, Jun-Ju, Korea.
  6. Kang, S-W. (2015). An Analysis of the Research Trends in Safety Education for Elementary School; Focused on Tendency and Task. The Journal of Elementary Education, 28(2). 1-24.
  7. Kim, C-H. (2004). (The) Relationship between the personality of elementary school students and the safety accidents in the school. Unpublished master's thesis, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education Chung-Buk, Korea.
  8. Kim, N-E. (2015). Development and Evaluation of Safety Theme-Based Home Economics Curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education Chung-Buk, Korea.
  9. Kim, J-Y. (2009). Comparison of elementary safety education in Korea and Japan. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Korea.
  10. Kim, S-J., & Kim, S-H. (2009). Development of a safety education guideline book for teachers of elementary school students. Journal of The Korean academy of Child health Nursing, 15(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.4094/jkachn.2009.15.2.145
  11. Kim, T-H. (2000). A Study on the Contents Analysis of Safety Education in Elementary School : Focusing on Comparison with the Needs of Students. Unpublished master's thesis, E-Hwa Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  12. Kim, Y-I. (2004). A Strategy for safety education through the practical arts subject. Journal of The Korean Association practical arts Education, 16(4), 51-65.
  13. Kim, Y-S., & Yoon, J-J. (2010). Early childhood teachers' perceptions regarding the content and instructional methods in safety education for young children. Journal of The Korean Society for Childhood Education, 30(4), 49-78.
  14. Korea consumer Agency. (2013). Consumer injury information and monitoring system. (www.kca.go.kr)
  15. Kong, B-W., An, H-K. (2009). Actualities and Problems on the Safety Education of Elementary School in Korea. Journal of Korean Association for Public Security Administration, 6(2), 279-298.
  16. Kwak, E-B. (2004). A study of young children's safety awareness. The Journal the research institute of Korea Education, 14, 107-122.
  17. Kwon, S-S. (2005). Development and Effect Evaluation of Safety Education Program for Higher Grade Students of Elementary School Purpose : This study eval. Journal of the Korea School Safety, 18(2), 45-61.
  18. Lee, G-E., & Jung, H-S. (2012). A Study on Development of the Contents System for Safety Education in Elementary School Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop. Korea Journal of School Health, 25(2), 175-191.
  19. Lee, M-S., & Park, K-O. (2004). School Safety Education Factors Predicting Injury Prevalence Among Korean Adolescence. Journal of Health Education, 21(2), 147-165.
  20. Lee, M-H. (2009). An Analysis of the Research Trends in Safety Education for Young Children. Journal of Educational theory and practice, 14(3). 75-98.
  21. Lee, Y-S., Yoo, S-J. (2014a). An Analysis on the Elements of Activating Happiness Education Suggested by Noddings Reflected in the Home Economics Part of Middle School Technology-Home Economics Textbook Volume 1 of 2009 Curriculum Revision. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 26(1), 31-53.
  22. Lee, Y-S., Yoo, S-J. (2014b). n Analysis on the Elements of Activating Happiness Education Suggested by Noddings Reflected in the Home Economics Part of Middle School Technology-Home Economics Textbook Volume 2 of 2009 Curriculum Revision. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 26(3), 91-112.
  23. Lee, J-S. (1997). Psychological Perspectives on Safety: Behavior-Based Approach and Human Factors Approach. Journal of Psychological Science, 8(1), 39-63.
  24. Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
  25. Ministy of Education. (2011). 2009 curriculum revision.
  26. Ministy of Education. (2015a). 7 safety Education standards.
  27. Ministy of Education. (2015b). 2015 curriculum revision.
  28. Ministry of Statistics Korea. (2013). 2012 Cause of Death Statistics. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/3/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=308560
  29. Park, M-H. (2012). An Exploratory Research on the Introduction of the Concept of Happiness in the School Curriculum - Focusing to enhance Capabilities of Happiness on Technology and Home Economics Education Curriculum. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 24(4), 117-132.
  30. Seo, Y-H., & Jung, H-Y. (2012). meaning of pre-service educare teachers' experiences about child safety management classes based on problem based learning (PBL). Journal of The Korean Association Child Care and Education, 8(1), 145-167.
  31. Suk, H-M. (2005). A Study on Safety Training Program at Elementary School : with an Emphasis on Curriculum Changes. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Seoul, Seoul, Korea.
  32. Worick, W. (1975). Safety education. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  33. Yim, H. (2003). The Effects of School Safety Education Program on the Safety Behavior among Elementary School Student in Korea. Unpublished master's thesis, Jun-Buk National University of Education, Jun-Buk, Korea.
  34. Yim, H-J., Lee, J-Y., Park, K-M., & Sul, D-H. (1997). An Emperical Research on the Quality of Life and Psycho-Physical Safety. Journal of The Population Association of Korea, 20(1), 161-199.
  35. Yoo, H-J. (2008). A Study for Securing the Safety Right : Focused on the Criterion of the Acceptable Risk Level for Disadvantaged Class. Journal of The Korea crisis management, 4(2), 17-31.
  36. Han, D-W. (2003). A psychological approach to the safety problems in Korean society. Korean journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 9(Specail), 35-55.

Cited by

  1. 사회적 요구를 반영하는 미래 가정과교육 분야의 평생교육 내용 제안: 가족생활교육으로서의 내용과 프로그램을 중심으로 vol.56, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2018.018
  2. 소셜 네트워크 분석(SNA)을 이용한 실과(기술·가정)교육 분야 연구 동향 분석 vol.56, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2018.043
  3. 네트워크 텍스트 분석을 이용한 한국가정과교육학회지 논문의 연구 동향 분석 vol.31, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2019.12.31.4.1
  4. 건강신념모델을 적용한 의생활 안전교육 교수·학습 과정안 개발 및 효과평가 vol.32, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.03.32.1.127
  5. 가상현실 기반 안전교육 콘텐츠 유형 연구 vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2021.21.01.434
  6. Trends in Civic Engagement Disaster Safety Education Research: Systematic Literature Review and Keyword Network Analysis vol.13, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052505