한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection)

  • 제20권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1-9
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2234-6937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6979(eISSN)
한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 (Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

예방적 유지관리를 통한 교량의 생애주기비용 절감 효과 분석

Bridge Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Preventive Maintenance

  • 정유석 (충남대학교 건설방재연구소) ;
  • 김우석 (충남대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 이일근 (도로교통원구원 구조물연구실) ;
  • 이재하 (한국해양대학교 건설공학과)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.01
  • 심사 : 2016.07.18
  • 발행 : 2016.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 교량의 예방적 유지관리 효과를 생애주기비용 절감 측면에서 분석 하였다. 예방적 유지관리는 현재 실시되고 있는 대응적 유지관리 전략과 대비 되는 유지관리 전략으로 교량의 열화지연을 통해 궁극적으로는 교량의 사용수명을 연장 시키며 생애주기비용을 절감시키는 유지관리 전략이다. 이러한 예방적 유지관리 효과를 분석하기 위해 교량의 공용연수에 따른 건전도 점수 변화 모델과 FHWA 자료를 바탕으로 한 국내 고속도로 교량의 건전도 점수에 따른 보수 보강 비용 모델을 제시 하였다. 제시한 복수의 모델과 국내외 참고 문헌을 바탕으로 제안된 예방적 유지관리 항목(청소와 도장)의 비용과 주기를 활용하여 사용수명 100년까지의 표준교량($1,730m^2$/교량) 당 생애주기 비용과 향후 20년간의 고속도로 총 유지관리 비용을 산정 하였다. 분석 결과 100년간 예방적 유지관리 활동으로 인해 교량 당 5억원의 절감효과를 볼 수 있으며 현재 예방적 유지관리 활동을 실시할 경우 20년 후(2035년)에는 총 1,837억원, 즉 연간 약 92억원의 비용 절감효과를 볼 수 있는 것으로 분석 되었다.

The paper aims at evaluating effects of preventive maintenance on life cycle cost(LCC) reduction of bridges. The preventive maintenance activities capable to delay bridge deteriorations can reduce overall maintenance costs and extend service life of a bridge by regularly providing maintenance activities and avoiding larger maintenance(repairs or rehabilitations) costs. Couple of prediction models were proposed in order to calculate LCC of a typical bridge: a health score model and repair rehabilitation cost model. In addition, the maintenance activities such as wash and painting were also suggested in order to consider effects of preventive maintenance in the analysis based on literature reviews. According to analysis results, new maintenance strategy(reactive maintenance + preventive maintenance) can save \0.5 billion per bridge for future life-cycle costs over 100 year analysis or \184 billion for entire HBMS(Highway Bridge Management System) inventory over 20 years. Small investments for preventive maintenance in improved bridge management can have a very significant return when considering the large bridge inventory.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASCE (2013), 2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure, American Society of Civil Engineers, U.S.
  2. Jeong, Y., Kim, W., Lee, I., Lee, J., and Kim, J. (2016a), Development of Bridge Inspection Reliability and Improvement Strategy, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, accepted (in Korean).
  3. Jeong, Y., Kim, W., Lee, I., Lee, J., and Kim, J. (2016b), Service Life Definition and end-of-life Criterion for Bridge Maintenance, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 20(4), 68-76 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2016.20.4.068
  4. KEC (2015), Unit Cost Tables for Construction Activities, Korea Expressway Corporation, Korea (in Korean).
  5. KECRI (2015), Prediction Model for Long-term Maintenance Costs of Highway Bridges (Final Report), Korea Expressway Corporation Research Institute, Korea (in Korean).
  6. KISTEC (2012), Guideline and Commentary of Safety Inspection and In-depth Safety Inspection for Structures-Bridge, Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation, Korea (in Korean).
  7. KISTEC (2014), Manual for Bridge Maintenance, Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation, Korea (in Korean).
  8. KOSIS (2014), Life Table of 2013, Korea Statistical Information Service, Korea (in Korean).
  9. KOSIS (2015), Status of the Nation's Bridges and Tunnels in Republic of Korea, Korea Statistical Information Service, Korea (in Korean).
  10. Lee, I., Park, C., Park, M., and Lee, I. (2016), Bridge Defect Management to Extend Service Life, Proceedings of Spring Conference of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 2016, 669-670 (in Korean).
  11. MnDOT (2002), Preventive Maintenance (Final Report), Minnesota Department of Transportation, U.S.
  12. MnDOT (2014), Transportation Asset Management Plan (Draft), Minnesota Department of Transportation, U.S.
  13. MOLIT (2012), Guideline of Safety Inspection and In-depth Safety Inspection for Structures, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea (in Korean).
  14. NYSDOT (2014), New York State DOT Transportation Asset Management Plan Draft v 05-02-14 (External Review), New York State Department of Transportation, U.S.
  15. Park, B., Park, C., Kim, J., and Shin, J. (2006), Preventive Maintenance of Highway Bridge Structures, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 10(3), 3-13 (in Korean).
  16. Park, C., Shin, J., and Lee, Y. (2005), Rational Measures for the Maintenance of Bridges, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 53(4), 2005, 104-111 (in Korean).
  17. Patterson, W. (1987), Road Deterioration and Maintenance Effects, The World Bank Highway Design and Maintenance Standards Series.
  18. Sun, J. and Park, K. (2014), Estimation of Budget Demands of Bridges Based on Maintenance Strategy, Proceedings of Spring Conference of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 2014, 785-788 (in Korean).
  19. Thompson, P. D., Ford, K. M., Arman, M. H. R., Labi, S., Sinha, K. C., and Shirole, A. M. (2012), Estimating Life Expectancies of Highway Assets-Volume 1: Guidebook, Transportation Research Board, NCHRP 713, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.
  20. Weykamp, P., Kimball, T., Hearn, G., Johnson, B. V., Ramsey, K., D'Andrea, A., and Becker, S. (2009), Best Practices In Bridge Management Decision-Making, NCHRP Scan 07-05, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.
  21. WisDOT (2008), A Systematic Process for Using Federal Aid to Support Bridge Preventive Maintenance, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, U.S.

피인용 문헌

  1. 초음파 속도법을 활용한 강판의 두께 변화 탐지를 위한 기초연구 vol.24, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2020.24.6.146
  2. 교량 상태에 따른 생애주기비용 영향 분석 vol.22, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2021.22.2.802