Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • 제38권
  • /
  • Pages.35.1-35.5
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
대한악안면성형재건외과학회 (Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical evaluation of sinus bone graft in patients with mucous retention cyst

  • Kim, Seong-Beom (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Yun, Pil-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2016.08.04
  • 심사 : 2016.09.02
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Mucous retention cyst refers to a cyst made by expansion due to the blockage of the salivary gland near the maxillary sinus, and it is surrounded by epithelial cells. Most of them are small; therefore, they cannot be found well and are frequently with antral polyp. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical prognosis of sinus bone graft in patients with mucous retention cyst. Methods: This study was performed retrospectively on 23 patients who had sinus bone graft. Group 1 was 8 patients (10 sinuses) who had a mucous retention cyst, and group 2 was 15 patients (17 sinuses) who had no pathologic history about the maxillary sinus. For these patients, sinus bone graft was performed using the lateral approach technique. The total 51 implants were placed 6.22 weeks on the average after sinus bone graft. Sinus membrane perforation during operation, postoperative complications, marginal bone loss after restorative function, implant success rate, and survival rate were analyzed. Results: There was no complication in group 1, and there were three complications in group 2. In group 2, two cases of implants failed. The types of postoperative complications consisted of two minor infections and one wound dehiscence. Two implants of total 51 implants were removed, and the survival rate of implants was 96.08 % (group 1 100 %, group 2 93.5 %). The total success rate of implants was 92.2 % (group 1 95 %, group 2 90.3 %). Conclusions: The clinical prognosis was not affected by the presence of mucous retention cyst.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS (1998) Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13:11-45
  2. Jin PY, Lin Y, Qiu LX (2005) Retrospective analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation for endosseous implants. Chin J Stomatol 40:441-444
  3. Beaumont C, Zafiropoulos GG, Rohmann K (2005) Prevalence of maxillary sinus disease and abnormalities in patients scheduled for sinus lift procedures. J Periodontol 76:461-7 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.461
  4. Misch CM, Misch CE, Resnik RR (1991) Post-operative maxillary cyst associated with a maxillary sinus elevation procedure: a case report. J Oral Implantol 17:432-7
  5. Gardner DG, Gullane PJ (1986) Mucoceles of the maxillary sinus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62:538-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90317-8
  6. Chan HL, Wang HL (2011) Sinus pathology and anatomy in relation to complications in lateral window sinus augmentation. Implant Dent 20:406-12 https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182341f79
  7. Ruprecht A, Batniji S, El-Neweihi E (1986) Mucous retention cyst of the maxillary sinus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62:728-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90271-9
  8. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (1998) Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 80:641 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70048-4
  9. Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D (2002) Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:381-9 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x
  10. Boyne PJ, James RA (1980) Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 38:613-6
  11. Tatum H Jr (1986) Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 30:207-29
  12. Shulman LB, Jensen OT (1998) Sinus Graft Consensus Conference. Introduction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 Suppl:5-6
  13. Ziccardi VB, Betts NJ (1999) Complications of maxillary sinus augmentation. In: Jensen OT (ed) Sinus bone graft. Quintessence Publishing Co., Carol Stream, IL
  14. Mardinger O, Manor I, Mijiritsky E, Hirshberg A (2007) Maxillary sinus augmentation in the presence of antral pseudocyst: a clinical approach. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:180-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.03.008
  15. Maiorana C, Beretta M, Benigni M, Cicciu M, Stoffella E, Grossi GB (2012) Sinus lift procedure in presence of mucosal cyst: a clinical prospective study. JIACD 4:54-60
  16. Wallace SS, Froum SJ (2003) Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 8:328-343 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328

피인용 문헌

  1. Management of Schneiderian Membrane Perforations during Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Preliminary Comparison of Two Different Approaches vol.8, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091491
  2. Stress Distribution on the Prosthetic Screws in the All-on-4 Concept: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis vol.46, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-19-00090
  3. Sinus Floor Augmentation in Presence of Mucocele Eroding Maxillary Sinus Wall: A Case Report With 3 Years Follow‐Up vol.10, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10083
  4. Sinus membrane elevation and implant placement vol.46, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.4.292
  5. Features of the histological structure shell of the maxillary sinus cyst with various diseases of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. vol.86, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20218604150
  6. A Reliable Surgical Procedure for Sinus Floor Augmentation with Antral Pseudocysts vol.9, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9100122