DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mixed-reality simulation for orthognathic surgery

  • Fushima, Kenji (Division of Orthodontics, Department of Highly Advanced Stomatology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University) ;
  • Kobayashi, Masaru (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University)
  • 투고 : 2016.01.14
  • 심사 : 2016.02.26
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31

초록

Background: Mandibular motion tracking system (ManMoS) has been developed for orthognathic surgery. This article aimed to introduce the ManMoS and to examine the accuracy of this system. Methods: Skeletal and dental models are reconstructed in a virtual space from the DICOM data of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) recording and the STL data of 3D scanning, respectively. The ManMoS uniquely integrates the virtual dento-skeletal model with the real motion of the dental cast mounted on the simulator, using the reference splint. Positional change of the dental cast is tracked by using the 3D motion tracking equipment and reflects on the jaw position of the virtual model in real time, generating the mixed-reality surgical simulation. ManMoS was applied for two clinical cases having a facial asymmetry. In order to assess the accuracy of the ManMoS, the positional change of the lower dental arch was compared between the virtual and real models. Results: With the measurement data of the real lower dental cast as a reference, measurement error for the whole simulation system was less than 0.32 mm. In ManMoS, the skeletal and dental asymmetries were adequately diagnosed in three dimensions. Jaw repositioning was simulated with priority given to the skeletal correction rather than the occlusal correction. In two cases, facial asymmetry was successfully improved while a normal occlusal relationship was reconstructed. Positional change measured in the virtual model did not differ significantly from that in the real model. Conclusions: It was suggested that the accuracy of the ManMoS was good enough for a clinical use. This surgical simulation system appears to meet clinical demands well and is an important facilitator of communication between orthodontists and surgeons.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Proffit WR, Turvey TA (2003) Dentofacial asymmetry. In: Proffit WR (ed) Contemporary treatment of dentofacial deformity, vol 1. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 574-644
  2. Tsurumi F, Takagi H, Fushima K (2000) A multivariate analysis for classification of craniofacial morphology in facial asymmetry. Bull Kanagawa Dent Col 28:15-27
  3. Saito N, Kobayashi M, Fushima K (2009) Skeletal and dental asymmetry in orthognathic case in Japan. Bull Kanagawa Dent Col 37:19-30
  4. Fushima K, Odaira Y, Saito N, Tsurumi F, Sato S (1998) Dental asymmetry in facial asymmetry. Bull Kanagawa Dent Col 26:15-21
  5. Minaguchi K, Fushima K, Kobayashi M (2007) Measurement error in a newly developed mandibular motion tracking system. Bull Kanagawa Dent Col 35:129-137
  6. Fushima K, Kobayashi M, Konishi H, Minagichi K, Fukuchi T (2007) Real-time orthognathic surgical simulation using a mandibular motion tracking system. Comput Aided Surg 12(2):91-104 https://doi.org/10.3109/10929080701253881
  7. Sinclair PM, Thomas PM, Tucker MR (1992) Common complications in orthogonathic surgery: etiology and management. In: Bell WH (ed) Modern practice in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery, vol 1. WBSaunders, Philadelphia, pp 48-83
  8. Arnett GW, Tamborello JA, Rathbone JA (1992) Temporomandibular joint ramifications of orthognathic surgery. In: Bell WH (ed) Modern practice in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery, vol 1. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 522-593

피인용 문헌

  1. Perioral soft tissue change after isolated mandibular surgery for asymmetry patients vol.45, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.039
  2. Three-dimensional surgical simulation for facial asymmetry: soft tissue-, skeleton-, and occlusion-based planning vol.39, pp.39, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-017-0135-z
  3. Augmented reality in dentistry: a current perspective vol.76, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1441437
  4. A novel augmented reality (AR) scheme for knee replacement surgery by considering cutting error accuracy vol.15, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1958
  5. Validation and Precision of Mixed Reality Technology in Baha Attract Implant Surgery vol.41, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000002749
  6. Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications in orthopedic surgery vol.16, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2067
  7. Virtual Reality Simulation and Augmented Reality-Guided Surgery for Total Maxillectomy: A Case Report vol.10, pp.18, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186288
  8. A review on the applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery vol.18, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2021.1860750
  9. Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality, and Hybrid Approach in Healthcare Simulation: A Systematic Review vol.11, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052338
  10. Virtual Reality (VR) Simulation and Augmented Reality (AR) Navigation in Orthognathic Surgery: A Case Report vol.11, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125673
  11. Quantitative Asymmetry Assessment between Virtual and Mixed Reality Planning for Orthognathic Surgery-A Retrospective Study vol.13, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091614
  12. Change in clinical crown height in adult patients treated by means of the multi-bracket appliance with extraction of four first premolars vol.48, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125211010815
  13. Augmented, Virtual and Mixed Reality in Dentistry: A Narrative Review on the Existing Platforms and Future Challenges vol.12, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020877