DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지자체 U-City 수준진단체계 평가지표

Evaluation Index for U-city Status Diagnostic Assessment System based on Local Governments

  • 이미영 (국토연구원 국토계획.지역연구본부) ;
  • 신주호 (국토연구원 도시연구본부) ;
  • 이재용 (국토연구원 도시연구본부 스마트.녹색도시연구센터)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.03
  • 심사 : 2016.09.30
  • 발행 : 2016.10.31

초록

유비쿼터스 도시(ubiquitous city, U-City)는 도시건설에 정보통신기술(ICT)이 접목되어 시민 삶의 질을 제고하고 도시를 효율적으로 관리하는 스마트한 도시의 개념을 내포한다. 유비쿼터스 도시의 건설 등에 관한 법률은 U-City의 구성요소로 도시통합운영센터, 지능화시설, U-City 기반시설 등을 제시하나 구체적 기준이 부재한 상태이다. 이로 인해 지자체들이 자의적 판단과 현실적 제약으로 U-City를 차별적으로 구축하고 있어 지자체 U-City의 질적 향상 및 품질 제고를 위한 노력이 필요한 시기이다. 지난 1-2차 연구단계에서는 U-City의 구성요소인 유비쿼터스 계획, 기술, 기반시설, 서비스 수준진단목표로서 안정성, 연결성, 목적부합성, 발전성을 기반으로 전반적 평가항목들을 검토하였다. 이 연구는 3차 단계로 지역현실에 맞게 지자체의 U-City 수준을 진단하기 위해 갱신 및 시범 적용이 가능한 실질적이고 구체적인 평가지표를 단계별로 소개한다. 연구결과를 통하여 U-City의 스마트화를 위한 지속적인 발전 및 고도화를 촉진하기 위해 자생적인 지역단위의 U-City로 정착할 수 있고 U-City의 재활성화 촉진에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

A Ubiquitous City (U-city, Smart City) is one that ties information communications technologies (ICT) into many facets of city construction, thereby implicitly intending to function as a smart city that aims to be efficiently managed as well as provide an enhanced standard of living for its residents. Laws related to the construction of such ubiquitous cities point to integrated city management centers, intelligent facilities, and U-City infrastructure, among others, as central components of U-Cities, but do not provide a standard for these structures. Consequently, building of U-Cities by local governments are based on arbitrary judgments constrained the myriad of practical limitations that they face. Such ambiguity brings to light the need to find ways to improve the quality of these efforts. The first and second stages of this research examine the status of the components of a U-City -ubiquitous planning, technology, infrastructure, and services - and undertakes a comprehensive review thereof, with evaluation criteria formulated on the characteristics of stability, connectivity, goal-orientation, and development potential. In the research's third stage, a realistic and detailed evaluation index by which U-Cities can be renewed, demonstrated, and applied (???) is introduced in a step-by-step fashion, which will allow for local governments to properly assess the standard of their U-City in relation to the realities of the locality. Through the research result, it is expected that the index will become a part of the continued development and advancement of the "smart" character of an autonomous U-City at the local scale, and contribute to the overall revitalization of the U-City.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport & Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement(2015-2016), A Study on U-City Enhancement for an Existing City (2nd & 3rd), Land Transport R&D Report.
  2. Lee J. Y. and Kim K.(2013), "A study on direction of smart living space," KRIHS Monthly Magazine : planning and policy, vol. 375, pp.54-59.
  3. Jang H. Y. and Lee J. Y.(2014), "Study for improvement and critical issues analysis in the law for the ubiquitous city construction," In Proceedings of the Korea Planning Association Spring Conference 2014, pp.24-28.
  4. Jang H, Y., Im Y. M. and Lee J. Y.(2015), A "Study on Development Directions of System for the Level Diagnosis of U-City for U-City Activation," Journal of the Korean Society for Geospatial information system, vol. 23, no. 2, pp.49-58. https://doi.org/10.7319/kogsis.2015.23.2.049
  5. Architecture & Urban Research Institute(2010), Reasonable implementation strategy for U-city, Green Growth Project Report, pp.15-32.
  6. Kim J. H. and Lee M. S.(2007), "A study on current issues for the realization of u-city," Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, vol. 15, no. 1, pp.1-14.
  7. Yi M. S., Shin D. B. and Lee J. Y.(2013), "Research on the Relative Importance and the Priority for the Functions of the U-City Service Aid Organization," Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, vol. 21, no. 2, pp.35-43.
  8. Smart City Council, http://smartcitiescouncil.com, 2016.4.15.
  9. Seo J. K. and Park C. H.(2016), "Indicator improvement method for developing U-City Level diagnosis system," Proceeding.

피인용 문헌

  1. 스마트시티 이슈 해결을 위한 정책프레임워크 개발방향에 관한 연구 vol.19, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2018.19.5.432