Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회지)

Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the Contributions of Individual Finger Forces in Various Submaximal Grip Force Exertion Levels

  • Kong, Yong-Ku (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Lee, Inseok (Civil, Safety and Environmental Engineering, Hankyong Naional University) ;
  • Lee, Juhee (Civil, Safety and Environmental Engineering, Hankyong Naional University) ;
  • Lee, Kyungsuk (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Developmemt Administration) ;
  • Choi, Kyeong-Hee (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • Received : 2016.06.27
  • Accepted : 2016.08.09
  • Published : 2016.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate contributions of individual finger forces associated with various levels of submaximal voluntary contraction tasks. Background: Although many researches for individual finger force have been conducted, most of the studies mainly focus on the maximal voluntary contraction. However, Information concerning individual finger forces during submaximal voluntary contraction is also very important for developing biomechanical models and for designing hand tools, work equipment, hand prostheses and robotic hands. Due to these reasons, studies on the contribution of individual finger force in submaximal grip force exertions should be fully considered. Method: A total of 60 healthy adults without any musculoskeletal disorders in the upper arms participated in this study. The young group (mean: 23.7 yrs) consisted of 30 healthy adults (15 males and 15 females), and the elderly group (mean: 75.2 yrs) was also composed of 30 participants (15 males and 15 females). A multi-Finger Force Measurement (MFFM) System developed by Kim and Kong (2008) was applied in order to measure total grip strength and individual finger forces. The participants were asked to exert a grip force attempting to minimize the difference between the target force and their exerted force for eight different target forces (5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, and 75% MVCs). These target forces based on the maximum voluntary contraction, which were obtained from each participant, were randomly assigned in this study. Results: The contributions of middle and ring fingers to the total grip force represented an increasing trend as the target force level increased. On the other hand, the contributions of index and little fingers showed a decreasing trend as the target force level increased. In particular, Index finger exerted the largest contribution to the total grip force, followed by middle, ring and little fingers in the case of the smallest target force level (5% MVC), whereas middle finger showed the largest contribution, followed by ring, index and little fingers at the largest target force levels (65 and 75% MVCs). Conclusion: Each individual finger showed a different contribution pattern to the grip force exertion. As the target force level increase from 5 to 75% MVC, the contributions of middle and ring fingers showed an increasing trend, whereas the contributions of index and little fingers represented a decreasing trend in this study. Application: The results of this study can be useful information when designing robotic hands, hand tools and work equipment. Such information would be also useful when abnormal hand functions are evaluated.

Keywords

References

  1. An, K.N., Chao, E.Y., Cooney, W.P. and Linscheid, R.L., Forces in the normal and abnormal hand, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 3(2), 202-211, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100030210
  2. Crago, P.E., Nakai, R.J. and Chizeck, H.J., Feedback regulation of hand grasp opening and contact force during stimulation of paralyzed muscle, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 38(1), 17-28, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.68205
  3. Fess, E.E. and Moran, C.A., Clinical Assessment Recommendations, American Society of Hand Therapist, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 1981.
  4. Kim, D.M. and Kong, Y.K., Research of grip forces and subjective preferences for various individual finger grip spans by using an "Adjustable Multi-Finger Force Measurement (MFFM) System", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 27(3), 1-6, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2008.27.3.001
  5. Kong, Y.K. and Lowe, B.D., Optimal cylindrical handle diameter for grip force tasks, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(6), 495-507, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2004.11.003
  6. Kong, Y.K., Lowe, B.D., Lee, S.J. and Krieg, E.F., Evaluation of handle shapes for screwdriving, Applied Ergonomics, 39(2), 191-198, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2007.05.003
  7. Kong, Y.K., Lee, K.S., Kim, D.M. and Jung, M.C., Individual finger contribution in submaximal voluntary contraction of gripping, Ergonomics, 54(11), 1072-1080, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.620176
  8. Lee, S.J., Kong, Y.K., Lowe, B.D. and Song, S., Handle grip span for optimising finger-specific force capability as a function of hand size, Ergonomics, 52(5), 601-608, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802422481
  9. Mason, M.T. and Salisbury Jr, J.K., Robot hands and the mechanics of manipulation. MIT Press, 1985.
  10. Ohtsuki, T., Inhibition of individual fingers during grip strength exertion, Ergonomics, 24(1), 21-36, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138108924827
  11. Radwin, R.G., Oh, S., Jensen, T.R. and Webster, J.G., External finger forces in submaximal five-finger static pinch prehension, Ergonomics, 35(3), 275-288, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967813
  12. Talsania, J.S. and Kozin, S.H., Normal digital contribution to grip strength assessed by a computerized digital dynamometer, Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), 23(2), 162-166, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(98)80165-4
  13. Trossman, B. and Li, P.W., The effect of the duration of intertribal rest periods on isometric grip strength performance in young adults, The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 9(6), 362-378, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944928900900604