Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Benefits of mineralized bone cortical allograft for immediate implant placement in extraction sites: an in vivo study in dogs

  • Orti, Valerie (Department of Periodontology, Montpellier University Hospital) ;
  • Bousquet, Philippe (Department of Periodontology, Montpellier University Hospital) ;
  • Tramini, Paul (Laboratory of Bioengineering and Nanoscience, University of Montpellier) ;
  • Gaitan, Cesar (Department of Stomatology, Centro Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autonoma) ;
  • Mertens, Brenda (Department of Periodontology, Montpellier University Hospital) ;
  • Cuisinier, Frederic (Department of Periodontology, Montpellier University Hospital)
  • Received : 2016.03.09
  • Accepted : 2016.07.13
  • Published : 2016.10.27
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using a mineralized bone cortical allograft (MBCA), with or without a resorbable collagenous membrane derived from bovine pericardium, on alveolar bone remodeling after immediate implant placement in a dog model. Methods: Six mongrel dogs were included. The test and control sites were randomly selected. Four biradicular premolars were extracted from the mandible. In control sites, implants without an allograft or membrane were placed immediately in the fresh extraction sockets. In the test sites, an MBCA was placed to fill the gap between the bone socket wall and implant, with or without a resorbable collagenous membrane. Specimens were collected after 1 and 3 months. The amount of residual particles and new bone quality were evaluated by histomorphometry. Results: Few residual graft particles were observed to be closely embedded in the new bone without any contact with the implant surface. The allograft combined with a resorbable collagen membrane limited the resorption of the buccal wall in height and width. The histological quality of the new bone was equivalent to that of the original bone. The MBCA improved the quality of new bone formation, with few residual particles observed at 3 months. Conclusions: The preliminary results of this animal study indicate a real benefit in obtaining new bone as well as in enhancing osseointegration due to the high resorbability of cortical allograft particles, in comparison to the results of xenografts or other biomaterials (mineralized or demineralized cancellous allografts) that have been presented in the literature. Furthermore, the use of an MBCA combined with a collagen membrane in extraction and immediate implant placement limited the extent of post-extraction resorption.

Keywords

References

  1. Wheeler SL, Vogel RE, Casellini R. Tissue preservation and maintenance of optimum esthetics: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:265-71.
  2. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, d'Archivio D, di Placido G, Tumini V, et al. Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol 2001;72:1560-71. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1560
  3. Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hammerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 Suppl:12-25.
  4. Lindeboom JA, Tjiook Y, Kroon FH. Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites: a prospective randomized study in 50 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:705-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.022
  5. Schropp L, Isidor F, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Patient experience of, and satisfaction with, delayed-immediate vs. delayed single-tooth implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:498-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01033.x
  6. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
  7. Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:615-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01317.x
  8. Araujo MG, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:606-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01315.x
  9. Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 5:1-21.
  10. Simion M, Dahlin C, Trisi P, Piattelli A. Qualitative and quantitative comparative study on different filling materials used in bone tissue regeneration: a controlled clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:198-215.
  11. Chen ST, Darby IB, Adams GG, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of bone augmentation techniques at immediate implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:176-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01093.x
  12. Barone A, Ricci M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Covani U. Bone remodelling after regenerative procedures around implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in Beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1131-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02084.x
  13. Dimova C. Socket preservation procedure after tooth extraction. Key Eng Mater 2014;587:325-30.
  14. Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:73-80.
  15. Han JY, Shin SI, Herr Y, Kwon YH, Chung JH. The effects of bone grafting material and a collagen membrane in the ridge splitting technique: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1391-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02127.x
  16. Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:990-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990
  17. Simon BI, Von Hagen S, Deasy MJ, Faldu M, Resnansky D. Changes in alveolar bone height and width following ridge augmentation using bone graft and membranes. J Periodontol 2000;71:1774-91. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.11.1774
  18. Vignoletti F, Sanz M. Immediate implants at fresh extraction sockets: from myth to reality. Periodontol 2000 2014;66:132-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12044
  19. Feuille F, Knapp CI, Brunsvold MA, Mellonig JT. Clinical and histologic evaluation of bone-replacement grafts in the treatment of localized alveolar ridge defects. Part 1: mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:29-35.
  20. Tomasi C, Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson B, Ferrus J, Lang NP, et al. Bone dimensional variations at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a multilevel multivariate analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:30-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01848.x
  21. Qahash M, Susin C, Polimeni G, Hall J, Wikesjo UM. Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:166-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01428.x
  22. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J. The jumping distance revisited: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.x
  23. Botticelli D, Renzi A, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Implants in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective 5-year follow-up clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1226-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01620.x
  24. Wilson TG Jr, Schenk R, Buser D, Cochran D. Implants placed in immediate extraction sites: a report of histologic and histometric analyses of human biopsies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:333-41.
  25. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:820-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x
  26. Klinge B, Alberius P, Isaksson S, Jonsson J. Osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral and synthetic hydroxylapatite ceramic in the repair of experimental skull bone defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:241-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90320-Y
  27. Araujo M, Linder E, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:123-35.
  28. Becker W. Treatment of small defects adjacent to oral implants with various biomaterials. Periodontol 2000 2003;33:26-35. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.03303.x
  29. Block MS, Finger I, Lytle R. Human mineralized bone in extraction sites before implant placement: preliminary results. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:1631-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0112
  30. Brugnami F, Then PR, Moroi H, Leone CW. Histologic evaluation of human extraction sockets treated with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and cell occlusive membrane. J Periodontol 1996;67:821-5. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.8.821
  31. Keith JD Jr, Petrungaro P, Leonetti JA, Elwell CW, Zeren KJ, Caputo C, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of a mineralized block allograft: results from the developmental period (2001-2004). Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:321-7.
  32. Lee DW, Pi SH, Lee SK, Kim EC. Comparative histomorphometric analysis of extraction sockets healing implanted with bovine xenografts, irradiated cancellous allografts, and solvent-dehydrated allografts in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:609-15.
  33. Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:189-99.
  34. Simion M, Trisi P, Piattelli A. GBR with an e-PTFE membrane associated with DFDBA: histologic and histochemical analysis in a human implant retrieved after 4 years of loading. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:338-47.
  35. Wang HL, Tsao YP. Histologic evaluation of socket augmentation with mineralized human allograft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:231-7.
  36. Wood RA, Mealey BL. Histologic comparison of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. J Periodontol 2012;83:329-36. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110270
  37. Wang HL, Boyapati L. "PASS" principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent 2006;15:8-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f
  38. Hammerle CH, Jung RE, Yaman D, Lang NP. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:19-25.

Cited by

  1. Biomimetic Tissue-Engineered Bone Substitutes for Maxillofacial and Craniofacial Repair: The Potential of Cell Sheet Technologies vol.7, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700919
  2. The utilization of vascularized pedicle combination epithelial‐sub epithelial tissue graft for socket preservation in the esthetic zone—A novel approach vol.7, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.2166
  3. Mega-oss and Mega-TCP versus Bio-Oss granules fixed by alginate gel for bone regeneration vol.6, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-020-0042-8
  4. Allograft and Collagen Membrane Augmentation Procedures Preserve the Bone Level around Implants after Immediate Placement and Restoration vol.17, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041133
  5. Recombinant collagen polypeptide as a versatile bone graft biomaterial vol.1, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-020-00089-9
  6. Pre-Clinical Models in Implant Dentistry: Past, Present, Future vol.9, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111538