DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surgical implications of anatomical variation in anterolateral thigh flaps for the reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial soft tissue defects: focus on perforators and pedicles

  • Kim, Ji-Wan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Ahn, Kang-Min (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Jee-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2016.07.02
  • Accepted : 2016.09.21
  • Published : 2016.10.31

Abstract

Objectives: To gain information on anatomical variation in anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps in a series of clinical cases, with special focus on perforators and pedicles, for potential use in reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial soft tissue defects. Materials and Methods: Eight patients who underwent microvascular reconstructive surgery with ALT free flaps after ablative surgery for oral cancer were included. The number of perforators included in cutaneous flaps, location of perforators (septocutaneous or musculocutaneous), and the course of vascular pedicles were intraoperatively investigated. Results: Four cases with a single perforator and four cases with multiple perforators were included in the ALT flap designed along the line from anterior superior iliac spine to patella. Three cases had perforators running the septum between the vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscle (septocutaneous type), and five cases had perforators running in the vastus lateralis muscle (musculocutaneous type). Regarding the course of vascular pedicles, five cases were derived from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (type I), and three cases were from the transverse branch (type II). Conclusion: Anatomical variation affecting the distribution of perforators and the course of pedicles might prevent use of an ALT free flap in various reconstruction cases. However, these issues can be overcome with an understanding of anatomical variation and meticulous surgical dissection. ALT free flaps are considered reliable options for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the oral and maxillofacial area.

Keywords

References

  1. Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 1984;37:149-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(84)90002-X
  2. Choi SW, Park JY, Hur MS, Park HD, Kang HJ, Hu KS, et al. An anatomic assessment on perforators of the lateral circumflex femoral artery for anterolateral thigh flap. J Craniofac Surg 2007;18:866-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3180a03304
  3. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2219-26; discussion 2227-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200206000-00007
  4. Lin SJ, Rabie A, Yu P. Designing the anterolateral thigh flap without preoperative Doppler or imaging. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010;26:67-72. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1234023
  5. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Nakatsuka T, Harii K. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1517-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00026
  6. Kawai K, Imanishi N, Nakajima H, Aiso S, Kakibuchi M, Hosokawa K. Vascular anatomy of the anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1108-17.
  7. Valdatta L, Tuinder S, Buoro M, Thione A, Faga A, Putz R. Lateral circumflex femoral arterial system and perforators of the anterolateral thigh flap: an anatomic study. Ann Plast Surg 2002;49:145-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200208000-00006
  8. Yu P. Reinnervated anterolateral thigh flap for tongue reconstruction. Head Neck 2004;26:1038-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20106
  9. Wong CH, Wei FC, Fu B, Chen YA, Lin JY. Alternative vascular pedicle of the anterolateral thigh flap: the oblique branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:571-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318195658f
  10. Urken ML, Cheney ML, Blackwell KE, Harris JR, Hadlock TA, Futran N. Atlas of regional and free flaps for head and neck reconstruction. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  11. Nakayama B, Hyodo I, Hasegawa Y, Fujimoto Y, Matsuura H, Yatsuya H, et al. Role of the anterolateral thigh flap in head and neck reconstruction: advantages of moderate skin and subcutaneous thickness. J Reconstr Microsurg 2002;18:141-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-28463
  12. Chana JS, Wei FC. A review of the advantages of the anterolateral thigh flap in head and neck reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2004;57:603-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2004.05.032
  13. Xu DC, Zhong SZ, Kong JM, Wang GY, Liu MZ, Luo LS, et al. Applied anatomy of the anterolateral femoral flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;82:305-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198808000-00016
  14. Pan SC, Yu JC, Shieh SJ, Lee JW, Huang BM, Chiu HY. Distally based anterolateral thigh flap: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1768-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000142416.91524.4C
  15. Zhou G, Qiao Q, Chen GY, Ling YC, Swift R. Clinical experience and surgical anatomy of 32 free anterolateral thigh flap transplantations. Br J Plast Surg 1991;44:91-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(91)90038-L
  16. Yu P, Sanger JR, Matloub HS, Gosain A, Larson D. Anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous island flaps in perineoscrotal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:610-6; discussion 617-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200202000-00030
  17. Koshima I. Free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects following cancer ablation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:2358-2360. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200006000-00007

Cited by

  1. Reconstruction of Thin and Pliable Oral Mucosa After Wide Excision of Oral Cancer Using a Trimmed Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap as an Adipofascial Flap : vol.29, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004404