Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Which factors are associated with difficult surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars?

  • Park, Kyeong-Lok (Department of Dentistry, Kosin University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.05.30
  • Accepted : 2016.10.06
  • Published : 2016.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate factors associated with increased difficulty in the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars and to improve identification of difficult cases. Materials and Methods: A total of 680 patients who required 762 surgical extractions of impacted lower third molars from 2009 to 2014 were enrolled in the study. Demographic factors, clinical factors, radiographic factors, surgical extraction difficulty, and presumed causes of difficulty were collected. Data were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 23. Results: Age, sex, depth of impaction, and blurred radiographic image influenced difficulty in surgical extraction. The position of the impacted tooth influenced surgical difficulty, especially when it was accompanied by other factors. Conclusion: It is challenging to design a reliable and practical instrument to predict difficulty in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. To identify very difficult cases, root investigation using computed tomography is advised when impacted tooth position suggests difficult extraction.

Keywords

References

  1. Hwang JK, Kim KW. Complications of impacted third molar extraction: retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;36:119-24. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2010.36.2.119
  2. Garcia AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS. Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;38:585-7. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.2000.0535
  3. Cortell-Ballester I, Almendros-Marques N, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Validation of a computer-assisted system on classifying lower third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e68-73.
  4. Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Mendez L, Gude-Sampedro F, Somoza-Martin JM, Gandara-Rey JM, Garcia-Garcia A. Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:23-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.12.004
  5. Bali A, Bali D, Sharma A, Verma G. Is Pederson index a true predictive difficulty index for impacted mandibular third molar surgery? A meta-analysis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2013;12:359-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-012-0435-x
  6. Akadiri OA, Fasola AO, Arotiba JT. Evaluation of Pederson index as an instrument for predicting difficulty of third molar surgical extraction. Niger Postgrad Med J 2009;16:105-8.
  7. Yuasa H, Kawai T, Sugiura M. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;40:26-31. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.2001.0684
  8. Obimakinde O, Okoje V, Ijarogbe OA, Obimakinde A. Role of patients' demographic characteristics and spatial orientation in predicting operative difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2013;3:81-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.109512
  9. Renton T, Smeeton N, McGurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery. Br Dent J 2001;190:607-10.
  10. Gbotolorun OM, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde AL. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1977-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.030
  11. Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:771-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.010
  12. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Estimating third molar extraction difficulty: a comparison of subjective and objective factors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:427-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.12.003
  13. Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE, Arotiba JT, Fasola AO. Relative impact of patient characteristics and radiographic variables on the difficulty of removing impacted mandibular third molars. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:51-8.
  14. Vanarsdall RL. Ectopically positioned and unerupted teeth. In: Fonseca RJ, ed. Oral and maxillofacial surgery volume 1. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000:289-90.
  15. Carvalho RW, do Egito Vasconcelos BC. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:2714-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.097
  16. Mahdey HM, Arora S, Wei M. Prevalence and difficulty index associated with the 3(rd) mandibular molar impaction among malaysian ethnicities: a clinico-radiographic study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ZC65-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12105
  17. Aznar-Arasa L, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Gay-Escoda C. Patient anxiety and surgical difficulty in impacted lower third molar extractions: a prospective cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:1131-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.04.005
  18. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1363-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.214
  19. Roy I, Baliga SD, Louis A, Rao S. Importance of clinical and radiological parameters in assessment of surgical difficulty in removal of impacted mandibular 3rd molars: a new index. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2015;14:745-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0731-8
  20. Juodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2013;4:e1.
  21. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Predicting third molar surgery operative time: a validated model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:5-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.08.004
  22. Suomalainen A, Venta I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:276-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.021

Cited by

  1. Bucco alveolar bone thickness of mandibular impacted third molars with different inclinations: a CBCT study vol.42, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02447-1
  2. To what extent are surgeons capable of establishing the difficulty degree of lower third molar surgery pre‐operatively? vol.14, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12533
  3. The Pattern of Mandibular Third Molar Impaction and Assessment of Surgery Difficulty: A Retrospective Study of Radiographs in East Baltic Population vol.18, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116016