Study on the Analysis of the Recognition and Improvements by Professors for the CAC(Computing Engineering Committee)

컴퓨터·정보(공)학 분야 공학교육인증제 운영성과에 대한 교수들의 인식 분석 및 개선방안 연구

  • Han, Ji Young (Innovation Center for Engineering Education, Daejin University) ;
  • Kang, So Yeon (Innovation Center for Engineering Education, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jeon, Ju Hyun (Innovation Center for Engineering Education, ChungAng University)
  • 한지영 (대진대학교 공학교육혁신센터) ;
  • 강소연 (연세대학교 공학교육혁신센터) ;
  • 전주현 (중앙대학교 공학교육혁신센터)
  • Received : 2016.08.12
  • Accepted : 2016.09.28
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

This study analyzed outcomes of CAC(Computing Accreditation Committee) program individually applied in the field of computing engineering since 2007, and draw improvements. Literature review through academic journals, survey research and the FGI(Focus Group Interview) were used to accomplish objectives of the study. In addition, the survey research and FGI were done for professors. For the survey research, nationally 20 out of 44 universities which operates the CAC program were investigated, and sample universities were considered by region. FGI was done to analyze the performance and problems of CAC in more detail for 6 experts. Results of the study were follows as; first, CAC program was activated through the Seoul Accord activation support business by government. Second, BSM(Basic Science and Math), engineering major and engineering design education have been strengthened compared with before and after of CAC introduction in the computing engineering field. Third, soft skills needed for students in the college of engineering have been organized in the professional general curriculum, and professors aware of improvement of ability of the students for the skills. The degree of satisfaction for the CAC program has been examined as normal level, but improvement of educational system and the overall quality enhancement of computing engineering education were affected by CAC program. Nonetheless of positive results of CAC program, incentive system for certification program graduates, the expansion of the autonomy of the department, reduction in the amount of self-evaluation report, and support of administrative human resources were suggested for taking root successfully of CAC program.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국공학교육인증원

References

  1. 김성조(2007). 컴퓨터.정보기술(CAC) 관련 분야 인증을 위한 다자간 국제협의체((가칭)서울 어코드) 추진 배경 및 현황. 공학교육. 14(3), 20-23.
  2. 김성조(2009). 한국공학교육인증원의 국제적 위상 II : 서울어 코드 설립과정 및 그 의의. 공학교육. 16(3), 38-45.
  3. 대진대학교(2012). 대진대학교 요람 2012. 대진대학교.
  4. 대진대학교(2014). 대진대학교 요람 2014. 대진대학교.
  5. 연세대학교(2002). 연세대학교 요람 2002. 연세대학교.
  6. 연세대학교(2015). 연세대학교 요람 2015. 연세대학교.
  7. 이강우 외(2014). 서울어코드활성화지원 백서.
  8. 중앙대학교(2007). 2006-2007 중앙대학교 요람. 중앙대학교.
  9. 중앙대학교(2011). 2010-2011 중앙대학교 요람. 중앙대학교.
  10. 중앙대학교(2014). 2013-2014 중앙대학교 요람. 중앙대학교
  11. 한국공학교육인증원(2015). 컴퓨터.정보(공)학교육인증기준 2015 (KCC2015). http://abeek.or.kr
  12. 한국공학교육인증원(2015). 컴퓨터.정보(공)학교육인증기준 2015 (KCC2015). 서울: 한국공학교육인증원.
  13. ABET Computing accreditation commission (2015). 2016-2017 Criteria for accrediting computing programs. MD: ABET engineering accreditation commission.
  14. 한국공학교육인증원 인증현황. http://www.abeek.or.kr/program/total accessed at 21, May, 2016.