Culinary science and hospitality research (한국조리학회지)

Culinary Society of Korean Academy (한국조리학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Consumer Eating out Purchases in Accordance with the Food Lifestyle - Focusing on the Moderating Effects of Consumer Culture -

식생활 라이프스타일에 따른 외식소비자의 구매의도에 관한 영향 연구 - 소비문화를 조절변수로 -

  • Yang, Dong-Hwi (Dept. of Food Service & Culinary Management, Kyonggi University)
  • 양동휘 (경기대학교 일반대학원 외식조리관리학과)
  • Received : 2016.04.19
  • Accepted : 2016.08.04
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research was conducted over four weeks from February 1, 2016 until Februay 29. Results were as follows. First, the effects of dietary lifestyle on the purchase intention of consumers was significant and postive, while food flavors (B=0.019 (p<.001)) and convenience (B=0.055 (p<.001)) had a significant and negative effect. To determine the coefficient to measure the adequacy of the model was explained 64.9% of variation in 0.649 premise, the model with F=187.244 (p<.001) to verify the significance level. Second, the moderating effects of consumer culture on the proposed realtionship was examined in 3 stages. The Stage 1 model found a significant effect (0.649, F=18.244 (p<0.01)). The Stage 2 model increased predictive power with the addition of "consumer culture" and was also significant(65.1% and F=142.119 (p<0.01)). The Stage 3 model increased the explanatory power due to the addition of 'lifestyle and found a significant moderating effect of 'Eating consumer culture' (65.9%, so for F=84.469 (p<0.01)).

본 연구는 2016년 2월 1일 4주간의 조사기간을 두어 실시하였고, 자료 수집은 수도권에 위치한 레스토랑 및 일반음식점 방문하는 고객을 대상으로 하였다. 결과를 보면 첫째, 식생활 라이프스타일이 외식소비자의 구매의도에 미치는 영향은 건강은 구매의도에 유의적인 영향력이 있었으나 미각과 편리는 구매의도에 유의적인 부(-)의 영향력이 있었다. 둘째, 식생활 라이프스타일에 따른 외식소비자가 소비문화의 조절효과는 1단계에서는 결정계수는 0.649, F=18.244(p<0.01)로 모형은 유의적으로 나왔다. 또한, 조절변수인 '소비문화'가 추가된 2단계 모형에서는 '소비문화'의 추가로 인한 설명력의 증가는 65.1%이고, 이에 대한 F=142.119(p<0.01)로 '소비문화' 추가는 유의적으로 나왔다. 조절효과를 검증하는 상호작용항이 추가로 들어간 3단계에서는 '식생활 라이프스타일*소비문화'의 추가적인 투입으로 인한 설명력의 증가는 65.9%이고, 이에 대한 F=84.469(p<0.01)로 조절효과는 유의적으로 나왔다. 식생활 라이프스타일과 소비문화의 개별적인 조절효과를 보면 건강지향성과 편리지향성은 유의적인 영향력이 있었으나, 미각 지향성은 유의적인 부(-)의 영향력이 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aaker Jennifer L (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research 24(3):347-356.
  2. Adler AA ed by Ansbacher HL (1969). The Science of Living, N.Y: Anchor Book Double day Co.
  3. Ambler T, Bhattacharya CB, Edel LJm, Keller KL (2002). Relating brandand customer perspectiveson marketing management. Journal of Service Research 5(1):13-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670502005001003
  4. Assael H (1984). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Behavior Orientation(2nd edition). Boston : Ket Publishing Company. 252-256.
  5. Cha SI (1992). Lifestyle study in the framework of a systematic analysis. Consumer Studies 3(1):46-63.
  6. Choi JY (2002). The Impact of Professional Sports Team Loyalty on Consumer Buying Behavior. Master's Thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  7. Jarvenpaa SL, Todd PA (1997). Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the world wide web. Journal of Electronic Commerce 1(2):59-88.
  8. Engel JE, Blackwell RD, Kollet DT (1986). Consumer Behavior, New York, N.Y.: CBS College Publishing.
  9. Engel JF, Blackwell RD (1982). Consumer Behavior. 4th ed, Illinois: The Dryden Press.
  10. Feldman SD, Thielbar GW (1975). LifeStyle: Diversityin American Society. Joural of Marketg July.
  11. Gillbert FW, Warren W E (1995). Psychographic constructs and demographic segments. Psychology and Marketing 12(3):223-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220120306
  12. Heo SK (2007). Purchasing Behavior for HMR Product by Life Style Patterns, Sejong University Graduate Thesis. Graduate Thesis, p.32.
  13. Jeon YM (2003). Lifestyle Catering Service Quality, Master's Thesis, Kyonggi University
  14. Jin YH (2007). The comparative study on consumer's purchase behaviors by sexuality. Korea Culinary Research 13(1):224-234.
  15. Kim DH (2016). A Study on the Effect of between the Coffee Shop Selection Attributes and Brand Reliability on the Customer's Purchasing Intention. Choongyang University.
  16. Kim HS, Jung JE (2001). A study on the eating out behavior of university students in Seoul. Korea Society of Food Culture 16(2):147-157.
  17. Kim YJ (2014) (The) Analysis of the Characteristics of the Consumer Culture of the Rich and the SeMantic Structure of the Characteristics : About the Super Rich Women Class with VIP Membership of Department Stores.
  18. Kim YY (2012). The Effect toward Consumption Values of Ethical Food Service Products on Attitude and Purchase Intention.
  19. Koh HS (2005). a study on the tour package choice behavior of korean outbound tourists by their life-style. Tourism Research 19(3): 101-116.
  20. Lee BS (2012). A Study on How the Well-bing Awareness of the Women in Busan, Ulsan, and Gyeongnam Areas according to their Lifestyles Affects Their Dining-out Behavioral Intention: With a Control Variable of Healthy Food Choice Attitude, Kyungsung University.
  21. Lee CW (1999). Purchase of Media Richness of Internet Shopping Site with Consumers and also Analyzes the Impact Site Satisfaction, Graduate Thesis, Hanyang University.
  22. Lee EH (2006). A Study on the Usage Patterns of the Coffee Shop Lifestyle focusing on the Starbucks. Master's Thesis, Sejong University.
  23. Lee SL (2006) Consumer's Consciousness of the LOHAS Consumption and the Consumption of the LOHAS Products.
  24. Lee SS (1999). According to the Actual Situation of the Elderly Living Lifestyle Research, Master's thesis Ewha Womans University.
  25. Lee SJ (2011). Social Responsibility (CSR) of the Company on the Road of Brand Image And Purchase: The Moderating Effect of Product Involvement Impact. Sungkyunkwan University Graduate Thesis, pp. 22-23.
  26. Lee SY (2012). Spatial Features of the Contemporary Consumption Trend in Blog Media Seoul University.
  27. Lee YJ, Lee SB (2008). The globalization strategy of the Korean national image, attitude, Korea, south Korea also impact on the availability Hotel Management Studies 17(3):117-135.
  28. Levy SJ (1963). Symbolism lifestyle, in Stephen A. Greyered, Toward Scientific Marketing, Chicago: AMA.
  29. McCraken (1988) Status rands: examining the effects of non-product-related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product and Brand Management 11(2):67-88, 1061-0421 SCOPUS. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420210423455
  30. Moore (1968). Economy and Society, N. Y : Bedwinster Press, Vol. 1.
  31. Nam SH (2005). Impact on the Silver Generation Lifestyle Consumption, Eating out. Graduate Thesis, Choongyang University.
  32. Oh YK (2008). Marketing Strategy of HMR Lifestyle through dietary analysis. Master's Thesis, Kyonggi University.
  33. Park HJ (1990). Empirical Study on the Model of the behavior of the Fish Bar for Predicting Consumer Preferences. Doctoral Thesis, Kyung Hee University.
  34. Park JH (2002). A Study on Brand Personality in Accordance with the Preferred Lifestyle, Thesis, Yonsei University.
  35. Park MH (1999). Relationship between Lifestyle and Life of Workers Athletic Participation, Doctoral Thesis, Korea University.
  36. Seung HS (2005) Bakery Products Usage Patterns of the Dietary Lifestyle. Doctoral Thesis, Ewha Women University.
  37. Slater, D (1997) Consumer Culture and Modernity. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
  38. Song IS (2002) Status and prospect of study on consumer culture. Journal of the Korea Home Economics Association 40(2):39-56.
  39. Taylor SA, Baker TL (1994). An assessment of the relationship between service quality and satisfaction in the formation of consumer's purchase intention. Journal of Retailing 2:163-178.
  40. Timtitanha (2016). Comparing the Cultural Comsumption between Korea and Vietnam. Dong-A university.
  41. Tumm (1988). Determinant behavior characteristics older consumer. Journal of Consumer Affairs 22(1):136-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1988.tb00217.x