Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Research on the Importance of Decision Making in Process of Promoting an Urban Regeneration Project -Focused on Cheong-ju City-

도시재생 사업추진과정에서의 의사결정기준 중요도 -청주시를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2016.07.15
  • Accepted : 2016.09.09
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Urban regeneration projects involve various stakeholders, which result in decision making processes that require long periods of time and cause many conflicts. This study aims to identify important factors in decision making for promoting an urban regeneration project. The analysis results utilizing AHP are as follows: Firstly, the analysis results identify the main considerations in the process of promoting urban regeneration projects as residents' opinion(0.393), involvement of local government(0.231), opinions of related experts(0.206) and master plan(0.169). Secondly, the key drivers of stakeholders' qualitative decision making were found to include sustainability(0.325), economic feasibility(0.277), ease of project implementation(0.232) and equity(0.166). Lastly, meaningful differences in the relative importance of key aspects of decision making were identified when respondents were grouped according to being aware or not aware of the urban regeneration project, as well as living on or living off the project site. The results of this study can be used to implement successful urban regeneration projects in the future.

도시재생사업 추진과정에는 다양한 주체들이 참여하게 된다. 이에 따라 사업추진을 위한 의사결정 과정이 장시간 소요되고 많은 갈등이 유발될 수 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 현재 추진 중이거나 추진 예정인 도시재생사업의 원활한 사업추진을 위한 중요 지표를 제시하고자 도시재생사업추진을 고려한 의사결정기준에 관한 중요도를 도출하였다. 본 연구에서는 도시재생사업이 추진 중인 지역의 추진주체들에 대한 설문조사 및 AHP 분석을 통하여 다음과 같은 분석결과를 도출하였다. 먼저 도시재생사업추진과정을 고려한 사업추진주체들의 의사결정기준 중요도를 분석한 결과 주민의견(0.393) > 지방자치단체 의지(0.231) > 전문가 의견(0.206) > 마스터플랜(0.169)의 순으로 중요도가 분석되었다. 다음으로 도시재생사업추진과정에서 사업참여자의 정성적 의사결정 기준에 관한 중요도를 분석한 결과 지속가능성(0.325) > 경제성(0.277) > 사업추진 용이성(0.232) > 형평성(0.166)의 순으로 중요도가 분석되었다. 끝으로 설문조사 과정에서 응답자를 도시재생사업 인지자와 미인지자 그룹, 도시재생사업지내 거주자와 사업지외 거주자 그룹으로 구분하여 보다 세부적인 분석을 실시한 결과, 일부 중요도 항목에서 의미 있는 차이점과 시사점이 도출되었다. 향후 본 연구의 성과가 도시재생사업의 성공적인 추진과 의미 있는 성과 도출을 위해 널리 활용되기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Urban Regeneration Information System, http://www.city.go.kr/
  2. LEE, Y. A., "Residents' Participation and Exclusion in Urban Regeneration Process : In the case of Samgakji, YoungJu City", Space and Socity, vol. 23, no. 4, 2013.
  3. KWON, J. J., J. H. JO, W. S. JEON and H. Y. HWANG, "Analysis on the Influences of the Governance Participants in the decision Making Process of Urban Regeneration Project of Jungang-dong, CheongJu-city", Journal of The Korean Urban Management Association, vol. 25, no. 2, 2012.
  4. SUNG, S. A., H. OH and H. Y. HWANG, "Anlysis of the Impact of Residents Participation Activities on Continued Motivation in an Urban Regeneration Project : Focused on Sajik-dong, Cheongju-si", Journal of The Korean Geographical Society, vol. 50, no. 4, 2015.
  5. JEONG, J. H., T. O. YOON, S. A. SUNG and H. Y. HWANG, "Analysis on the effect of urban-reneneration market revitalization programs : Focused on Joong-ang dong, Cheongju", The Geographical Journal of Korea, vol. 49, no. 1, 2015.
  6. LEE, W. K. and N. S. JI, "The Improvement Plan with Participation of Residents for Regeneration Project in Low-rise Residential Area", The Geographical Journal of Korea, vol. 49, no. 3, 2015.
  7. KIM, S. M. and J. S. HWANG, "Problems and Improvement of The Urban Regeneration and Assistance Act", Korean Law Association, vol. 60, 2015.
  8. KIM, H. C., "A Critical Review on the Conceptual Scope and Policy Institution Process in the Korean Context of Urban Regeneration", Journal of The Korean Urban management Association, vol. 26, no. 3, 2013.
  9. KIM, K, C. and G. Y. KIM, "A Study of Importance Analysis of Evaluation Factors in site Selection for the Urban Regeneration Scheme", Journal of The Korea Real Estate Society, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 5-21, 2015.
  10. BAE, W. K., "Housing Improvement and Citizen participation for the Recovery of Urban Community", Architectural Institute of Korea, vol. 46, No 11, 2002.
  11. LEE, Y. A., "The Urban Regeneration and Citizen Participation", The Korean Geographical Society, 2012.
  12. JUNG, S. G., K. J. MOON and K. J. YOO, "A Survey Study on Resident Participation in the Development of Urban Regeneration Project : Concentrated on the Sanbok-doro Renaissance Urban Regeneration Area in Busan", Journal of The Society of Architectural Institute Union, vol. 17, no. 5, 2015.
  13. SONG, D. K., "Participatory Planning for Urban Regeneration", Architectural Institute of Korea, vol. 52, no. 7, 2008.
  14. YOUN, H. K., "A Study or Various Method of Citizen Participation for Urban", Architectural Institute of Korea, vol. 55, no. 10, 2011.
  15. Cho, P. K., "A Study on the Improvement of Resident Participation for the effective promotion of the Urban Improvement project : Cases of the Gyeonggi Urban Regeneration Citizen Academy", Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, vol. 22, no. 4, 2010.
  16. KIM, M. S. and W. H. Lee, "A Study on the Creative City Construction Methodology of Citizen Participation for Old Downtown", Architectural Institute of Korea, vol. 33, no. 2, 2013.
  17. OH, H. E., "Community Based Revitalization Plan of Old Down Town Area with Residents' Participation : Focusing on Jemulpo Station Northern Area in Incheon City", Journal of The Korea Planning Association, vol. 50, no. 6, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2015.10.50.6.53
  18. Lee, H. J., H. S. CHOI and Y. K. OH, "Studies on the Communication Model for Sustainable Community Development", Lingua Humanitatis, vol. 15, no. 2, 2013.
  19. CHOI, N. R., K. M. HAN, J. I. BEAK and Y. U. BAN, "A Process Analyzing of the Community Participation for Involvement of Pedestrian Environment in Downtown, Cheong-ju City", Korea Environmental Policy and Administration Society, 2011.
  20. HONG, Y. and S. H. LEE, "The Improvement Strategies of Resident Participation through Hong Kong's Urban Regeneration Projects", Journal of The Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, vol. 28, no. 8, 2012.
  21. PARK, J. W. and T. S. SONG, "Conflict Mitigation Measures in Urban Regeneration Projects", Korea Policy Research, vol. 13, no. 3, 2013.
  22. KANG, H. K., J. H. YU, C. D. KIM and B. S. SON, "Key Management Factors Considering Characteristic of Urban Regeneration Project", Journal of The Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, vol. 25, no. 7, 2009.
  23. KIM, K. Y., Y. KIM, J. W. SHIN and H. S. KIM, "Importance Analysis of Efficient Urban Regeneration Projects on AHP : Focused on Changwon(Masan) City"
  24. CHO, J. K., C. T. HYUN, Y. S. YOON, Y. S. KIM and Y. W. CHA, "Risk Factor Classification and Weight Estimation for Urban Regeneration Project", Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 13, no. 4, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6106/kjcem.2012.13.4.089