DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Previous Gastrectomy on the Performance of Postoperative Colonoscopy

  • Kim, Sunghwan (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Jeongmin (Department of Internal Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae Han (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kong, Seong-Ho (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Suh, Yun-Suhk (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Im, Jong Pil (Department of Internal Medicine, Liver Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Hyuk-Joon (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sang Gyun (Department of Internal Medicine, Liver Research Institute) ;
  • Jeong, Seung-Yong (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Joo Sung (Department of Internal Medicine, Liver Research Institute) ;
  • Yang, Han-Kwang (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.07.27
  • Accepted : 2016.09.04
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a prior gastrectomy on the difficulty of subsequent colonoscopy, and to identify the surgical factors related to difficult colonoscopies. Materials and Methods: Patients with a prior gastrectomy who had undergone a colonoscopy between 2011 and 2014 (n=482) were matched (1:6) to patients with no history of gastrectomy (n=2,892). Cecal insertion time, intubation failure, and bowel clearance score were compared between the gastrectomy and control groups, as was a newly generated comprehensive parameter for a difficult/incomplete colonoscopy (cecal intubation failure, cecal insertion time >12.9 minutes, or very poor bowel preparation scale). Surgical factors including surgical approach, extent of gastrectomy, extent of lymph node dissection, and reconstruction type, were analyzed to identify risk factors for colonoscopy performance. Results: A history of gastrectomy was associated with prolonged cecal insertion time ($8.7{\pm}6.4$ vs. $9.7{\pm}6.5$ minutes; P=0.002), an increased intubation failure rate (0.1% vs. 1.9%; P<0.001), and a poor bowel preparation rate (24.7 vs. 29.0; P=0.047). Age and total gastrectomy (vs. partial gastrectomy) were found to be independent risk factors for increased insertion time, which slowly increased throughout the postoperative duration (0.35 min/yr). Total gastrectomy was the only independent risk factor for the comprehensive parameter of difficult/incomplete colonoscopy. Conclusions: History of gastrectomy is related to difficult/incomplete colonoscopy performance, especially in cases of total gastrectomy. In any case, it may be that a pre-operative colonoscopy is desirable in selected patients scheduled for gastrectomy; however, it should be performed by an expert endoscopist each time.

Keywords

References

  1. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2016 [cited 2016 Mar 22]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx.
  2. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Cho H, Lee DH, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2012. Cancer Res Treat 2015;47:127-141. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.060
  3. Cancer Statistics in Japan '14 [Internet]. Kashiwa: Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research (FPCR); 2016 [cited 2016 Mar 20]. Available from: http://ganjoho.jp/data/reg_stat/statistics/brochure/2014/cancer_statistics_2014_app_E.pdf.
  4. Kim JW, Jang JY, Chang YW, Kim YH. Clinical features of second primary cancers arising in early gastric cancer patients after endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:8358-8365. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i27.8358
  5. Ikeda Y, Saku M, Kawanaka H, Nonaka M, Yoshida K. Features of second primary cancer in patients with gastric cancer. Oncology 2003;65:113-117. https://doi.org/10.1159/000072335
  6. Eom BW, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, Cho JJ, Kim WH, Yang HK, et al. Synchronous and metachronous cancers in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2008;98:106-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21027
  7. Yoo HM, Gweon TG, Seo HS, Shim JH, Oh SI, Choi MG, et al. Role of preoperative colonoscopy in patients with gastric cancer: a case control study of the prevalence of coexisting colorectal neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1614-1622. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2737-0
  8. Lee SK, Kim TI, Shin SJ, Kim BC, Kim WH. Impact of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery on colonoscopy outcomes. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:711-716. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-200609000-00010
  9. Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2297-2303. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.032
  10. Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH, Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Johnston TK. Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:307-314. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2002.121883
  11. Rathgaber SW, Wick TM. Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:556-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.014
  12. Elphick DA, Donnelly MT, Smith KS, Riley SA. Factors associated with abdominal discomfort during colonoscopy: a prospective analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;21:1076-1082. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e32832357b3
  13. Park DI, Kim HJ, Park JH, Cho YK, Sohn CI, Jeon WK, et al. Factors affecting abdominal pain during colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;19:695-699. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.meg.0000219097.32811.24
  14. Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M, Sakumoto K. Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1295-1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0940-1
  15. Kim WH, Cho YJ, Park JY, Min PK, Kang JK, Park IS. Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:600-605. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2000.109802
  16. Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W, Gottfried E, Ingber S, Bernstein G, et al. Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:558-562. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2001.118950
  17. Saunders BP, Fukumoto M, Halligan S, Jobling C, Moussa ME, Bartram CI, et al. Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women? Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:124-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(06)80113-6
  18. Kim HS, Kim BS, Lee IS, Lee S, Yook JH, Kim BS. Laparoscopic gastrectomy in patients with previous gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a report of 17 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014;24:177-182. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828f6bfb
  19. Park HJ, Hong JH, Kim HS, Kim BR, Park SY, Jo KW, et al. Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees. BMC Med Educ 2013;13:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-5
  20. Garrett KA, Church J. History of hysterectomy: a significant problem for colonoscopists that is not present in patients who have had sigmoid colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53:1055-1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d569cc
  21. Korman LY, Overholt BF, Box T, Winker CK. Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:554-557. https://doi.org/10.1067/S0016-5107(03)01890-X
  22. Lee BI, Hong SP, Kim SE, Kim SH, Kim HS, Hong SN, et al. Korean guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection. Clin Endosc 2012;45:25-43. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.25