Journal of Gastric Cancer

The Korean Gastric Cancer Association (대한위암학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean Gastric Cancer Association Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer in 2014

  • Received : 2016.08.01
  • Accepted : 2016.08.27
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA) has conducted nationwide surveys every 5 years, targeting patients who received surgical treatment for gastric cancer. We report the results of the 2014 nationwide survey and compare them to those of the 1995, 1999, 2004, and 2009 surveys. Materials and Methods: From March 2015 to January 2016, a standardized case report form was sent to every member of the KGCA via e-mail. The survey consisted of 29 questions, regarding patient demographics as well as tumor-, and surgery-related factors. The completed data forms were analyzed by the KGCA information committee. Results: Data on 15,613 patients were collected from 69 institutions. The mean age was $60.9{\pm}12.1$ years, and the proportion of patients more than 70 years of age increased from 9.1% in 1995 to 25.3% in 2014. Proximal cancer incidence steadily increased from 11.2% in 1995 to 16.0% in 2014. Early gastric cancer incidence consistently increased and accounted for 61.0% of all cases in 2014. The surgical approach was diversified in 2014, and 7,818 cases (50.1%) were treated with a minimally invasive approach. The most common anastomosis was Billroth I (50.2%) after distal gastrectomy, and the proportion of Roux-en-Y anastomoses performed increased to 8.6%. Conclusions: The results of this survey are expected to be important data for future studies and to be useful for generating a national cancer control program.

Keywords

References

  1. National Cancer Information Center [Internet]. Goyang: National Cancer Center; 2015 [cited 2016 May 31]. Available from: http://www.cancer.go.kr/mbs/cancer/jsp/album/gallery.jsp?boardType=02&boardId=31817&listType=02&boardSeq=15022674&mcategoryId=&id=cancer_050207000000&spage=1#.
  2. Oh CM, Won YJ, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Cho H, Lee JK, et al. Cancer Statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2013. Cancer Res Treat 2016;48:436-450. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.089
  3. Korea Gastric Cancer Association. Nationwide Gastric Cancer Report in Korea Korea Gastric Cancer Association. J Korean Gastric Cancer Assoc 2002;2:105-114. https://doi.org/10.5230/jkgca.2002.2.2.105
  4. The Information Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association. 2004 Nationwide Gastric Cancer Report in Korea. J Korean Gastric Cancer Assoc 2007;7:47-54. https://doi.org/10.5230/jkgca.2007.7.1.47
  5. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:101-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5
  6. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. Vol 3. 4th ed. Geneva: WHO, 2010.
  7. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. 7th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2010.
  8. Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer 2011;11:69-77. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69
  9. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, eds. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon: IARC Press, 2000:37-68.
  10. Min BH, Huh KC, Jung HK, Yoon YH, Choi KD, Song KH, et al. Prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease in Korea: a population-based study using the Rome III criteria. Dig Dis Sci 2014;59:2721-2729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3243-y
  11. Derakhshan MH, Malekzadeh R, Watabe H, Yazdanbod A, Fyfe V, Kazemi A, et al. Combination of gastric atrophy, reflux symptoms and histological subtype indicates two distinct aetiologies of gastric cardia cancer. Gut 2008;57:298-305. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.137364
  12. Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, Nyren O. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999;340:825-831. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199903183401101
  13. Wu AH, Tseng CC, Bernstein L. Hiatal hernia, reflux symptoms, body size, and risk of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2003;98:940-948. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11568
  14. Bertuccio P, Rosato V, Andreano A, Ferraroni M, Decarli A, Edefonti V, et al. Dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 2013;24:1450-1458. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt108
  15. Olefson S, Moss SF. Obesity and related risk factors in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer 2015;18:23-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0425-4
  16. Park JY, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Nam BH, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, et al. Assessment of laparoscopic stomach preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection versus standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer-A multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (SENORITA trial) protocol. BMC Cancer 2016;16:340. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2336-8
  17. Kim CH, Song KY, Park CH, Seo YJ, Park SM, Kim JJ. A comparison of outcomes of three reconstruction methods after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer 2015;15:46-52. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2015.15.1.46
  18. Park JY, Kim YJ. Uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy can be a favorable method in terms of gastritis, bile reflux, and gastric residue. J Gastric Cancer 2014;14:229-237. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2014.14.4.229
  19. Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Javed MA, Nunes QM, Huang W, Mai G, et al. Roux-en-Y versus Billroth I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:1124-1134. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i7.1124
  20. Tanaka K, Takiguchi S, Miyashiro I, Hirao M, Yamamoto K, Imamura H, et al. Impact of reconstruction method on visceral fat change after distal gastrectomy: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Billroth I reconstruction and rouxen-Y reconstruction. Surgery 2014;155:424-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.08.008
  21. Tanaka K, Miyashiro I, Yano M, Kishi K, Motoori M, Shingai T, et al. Visceral fat changes after distal gastrectomy according to type of reconstruction procedure for gastric cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2013;11:146. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-146
  22. Nakamura M, Nakamori M, Ojima T, Iwahashi M, Horiuchi T, Kobayashi Y, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing long-term quality of life for Billroth I versus Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2016;103:337-347. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10060

Cited by

  1. Value and impact factors of multidetector computed tomography in diagnosis of preoperative lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer : A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis vol.96, pp.33, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000007769
  2. Current status and challenges in sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer vol.29, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.02.01
  3. Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy as a Surgical Treatment for Upper Third Early Gastric Cancer vol.70, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2017.70.3.134
  4. Actual 5-Year Nutritional Outcomes of Patients with Gastric Cancer vol.17, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e12
  5. Comparison of the Differences in Survival Rates between the 7th and 8th Editions of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: a Single-Institution Study of 5,507 Patients in Korea vol.17, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e23
  6. Complications and Survival Rate of Patients Over 80 Years Old Who Underwent Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer vol.20, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2017.20.4.150
  7. Risk Factors of Microscopic Invasion in Early Gastric Cancer vol.17, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e37
  8. Comprehensive Analysis of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Preoperative Prognostic Prediction Nomogram in Gastric Cancer vol.42, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4510-4
  9. Non-exposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection (NESS-EFTR) versus laparoscopic wedge resection: a randomized controlled trial in a porcine model vol.32, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5921-2
  10. Intracorporeal delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy in reduced-port robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes vol.32, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6244-7
  11. Right-Side Approach-Duet Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (R-Duet TLDG) Using a Three-Port to Treat Gastric Cancer vol.22, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3575-y
  12. Multimodal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program is the Optimal Perioperative Care in Patients Undergoing Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized vol.25, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6625-0
  13. Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Ischemic Stroke Incidence in Gastric Cancer Survivors: A Nationwide Study in Korea vol.25, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6635-y
  14. Updates on Cancer Epidemiology in Korea, 2018 vol.54, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2018.54.2.90
  15. Real‐time detection system for tumor localization during minimally invasive surgery for gastric and colon cancer removal: In vivo feasibility study in a swine model vol.117, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24922
  16. Is Lymph Node Size a Reliable Factor for Estimating Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer? vol.18, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e1
  17. Successful Robotic Gastrectomy Does Not Require Extensive Laparoscopic Experience vol.18, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e10
  18. Role of Laparoscopic Management for Postgastrectomy Complications vol.28, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0541
  19. T-shaped Modified Delta Anastomosis as a Simple Intracorporeal Gastroduodenostomy vol.21, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2018.21.2.57
  20. Incidence of gallstones after gastric resection for gastric cancer: a nationwide claims-based study vol.95, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2018.95.2.87
  21. Impact of Various Types of Comorbidities on the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Carcinoma vol.18, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e27
  22. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy as Treatment Options for Peritoneal Metastasis of Advanced Gastric Cancer vol.18, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e32
  23. Trends in Gastric Cancer Incidence According to the Clinicopathological Characteristics in Korea, 1999-2014 vol.50, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.464
  24. Role of preoperative endoscopic clipping in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer vol.97, pp.45, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000013165
  25. ASO Author Reflections: Multimodal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program in Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: What Have We Learned? vol.25, pp.suppl3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6848-0
  26. Effect of the Remnant Stomach Volume on the Nutritional and Body Composition in Stage 1 Gastric Cancer Patients vol.9, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.18858/smn.2018.9.2.41
  27. Function-Preserving Surgery in Gastric Cancer vol.21, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2018.21.4.141
  28. Actual compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer vol.96, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2019.96.4.185
  29. Treatment for gastric ‘indefinite for neoplasm/dysplasia’ lesions based on predictive factors vol.25, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i4.469
  30. Clinicopathological features and prognostic impact of splenic hilar lymph node metastasis in proximal gastric carcinoma vol.45, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.10.531
  31. Sentinel node navigation surgery using near-infrared indocyanine green fluorescence in early gastric cancer vol.33, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6401-z
  32. Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer : The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial vol.5, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727
  33. Additional gastrectomy in early-stage gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic resection: a meta-analysis vol.7, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goz007
  34. Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer vol.33, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6448-x
  35. Comparison of Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy by Location of Mini-Laparotomy Site vol.22, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2019.22.2.75
  36. Rapid Staining Using the Shorr Method for Intraoperative Peritoneal Washing Cytology in Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Pilot Study from a Single Institution vol.19, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e14
  37. Early Postoperative Oral Feeding After Total Gastrectomy in Gastric Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study Using Propensity Score Matching vol.43, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1438
  38. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early cancer involving the upper third: can we go higher? vol.22, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-00921-9
  39. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Prediction of Early Complications after Gastrectomy in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer: the Phase Angle Measured Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis vol.19, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e22
  40. Increased Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture in Postgastrectomy Gastric Cancer Survivors Compared With Matched Controls: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea vol.114, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000436
  41. Predicting lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients: development and validation of a model vol.15, pp.31, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2019-0377
  42. A multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) comparing the quality of life between laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric vol.19, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5396-8
  43. The optimal extent of lymph node dissection in gastroesophageal junctional cancer: retrospective case control study vol.19, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5922-8
  44. Risk of Dementia in Gastric Cancer Survivors Who Underwent Gastrectomy: A Nationwide Study in Korea vol.26, pp.13, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07913-8
  45. Short-term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS vol.270, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003217
  46. Surgical Outcomes and Follow-Up Results of 100 Cases of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Using the Overlap Method with Stapled Closure vol.22, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2019.22.4.150
  47. Feasibility of No Prophylactic Antibiotics Use in Patients Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: a Propensity Score-Matched Case-Control Study vol.19, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e41
  48. Abundance of CD163-Positive Tumor-Associated Macrophages in the Early Gastric Cancer Predicts the Recurrence after Curative Resection vol.38, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1159/000506122
  49. Endoscopic Treatment of a Twisted Small Bowel Obstruction after Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Tract Reconstruction vol.75, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2020.75.5.296
  50. Advantages of Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy over Total Gastrectomy in the Quality of Life of Long-Term Gastric Cancer Survivors vol.20, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e17
  51. Operative safety of curative gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer - 1:2 propensity score matching analysis: A retrospective single-center study (cohort stu vol.80, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.041
  52. Utilizing Cultural and Ethnic Variables in Screening Models to Identify Individuals at High Risk for Gastric Cancer: A Pilot Study vol.13, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-19-0490
  53. Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair and Roux-en-Y Conversion for Refractory Duodenogastroesophageal Reflux after Billroth I Distal Gastrectomy vol.20, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e23
  54. Prognostic Factors in Stage IB Gastric Cancer after Surgical Resection vol.20, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e30
  55. The Different Clinicopathological Features of Remnant Gastric Cancer Depending on Initial Disease of Partial Gastrectomy vol.12, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102847
  56. Changing trends of clinicopathologic features and survival duration after surgery for gastric cancer in Northeast China vol.12, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1119
  57. A comparison between pylorus-preserving and distal gastrectomy in surgical safety and functional benefit with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.18, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01910-y
  58. Clinical Outcome of Novel Reconstruction of Double Shouldering Technique after Proximal Gastrectomy vol.23, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2020.23.4.191
  59. Clinical Significance of CLDN18.2 Expression in Metastatic Diffuse-Type Gastric Cancer vol.20, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e33
  60. Endoscopic Resection of Undifferentiated-type Early Gastric Cancer vol.20, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e37
  61. Long-term Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer : A Propensity Score-weighted Analysis of 2084 Consecutive Patients vol.274, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003845
  62. Early Clinical Outcomes of the Morbidly Obese Patients Who Underwent Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy by Gastric Cancer Surgeons: the Analysis of Fifty Consecutive Cases vol.10, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2021.10.2.66
  63. The role of laparoscopic management in perforated gastric cancer vol.101, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2021.101.3.151
  64. Are the elderly patient's changes in the health-related quality of life one year after gastrectomy for stomach cancer different from those in young patients? vol.100, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2021.100.1.8
  65. Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis Among Adults With Gastric Adenocarcinoma Managed With Total Gastrectomy vol.4, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35810
  66. Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Gastric Cancer to Identify Those Suitable for Middle Segmental Gastrectomy vol.4, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1840
  67. Is it Beneficial to Utilize an Articulating Instrument in Single-Port Laparoscopic Gastrectomy? vol.21, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e2
  68. Intraoperative Tumor Localization of Early Gastric Cancers vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e4
  69. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes of Reduced Three-Port Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early-Stage Gastric Carcinoma: a Retrospective Large-Scale Multi-Institutional Study vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e8
  70. A comparative study of the short-term operative outcome between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomoses during laparoscopic total gastrectomy vol.35, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07539-y
  71. Sema3C promotes hepatic metastasis and predicts poor prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma vol.49, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211009802
  72. Current indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer vol.13, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v13.i6.560
  73. Transpyloric optic navigation of tumor using a laparoscope during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.24, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2021.24.2.76
  74. A blood-based transcriptomic signature for noninvasive diagnosis of gastric cancer vol.125, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01461-3
  75. Preferences of first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients for gastric cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment vol.21, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08677-9
  76. Postoperative morbidity and quality of life between totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy: a propensity-score matched analysis vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08744-1
  77. Functional benefits of the double flap technique after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01390-1